Skip to main content
Log in

Parameters for specific detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus in potato stems and tubers by multiplexed PCR-ELISA

  • Published:
American Journal of Potato Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A multiplex PCR-ELISA protocol for detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus (Cms) was developed that is based on primers for amplification of three single-copy, unique DNA sequences, Cms50, Cms72, and Cms85. The three sequences were simultaneously amplified from the genomes of all 42 strains of Cms that were tested including variant mucoid forms, but not from strains representing five related subspecies, andRathayibacter rathayi andRhodococcus faciens. The lowest limit of detection by gel electrophoresis was estimated to be approximately 300 CFU per mL when cells were spiked into potato core fluid, but sensitivity increases approximately 10-fold using PCR-ELISA. Inclusion of a sea anemone DNA fragment engineered so it could be amplified from the Cms72 primer set provided the simultaneous signal that the system functioned properly when any sample was free of the pathogen. The addition of hydrolyzed casein to the reaction mix was demonstrated to markedly reduce or eliminate inhibition of PCR by plant cell components or contaminants. Multiplex PCR-ELISA detection of Cms was determined to be verifiable for analysis of both stems and tubers based on the amplification of multiple sites in its genome, it provides absolute specificity, and it was more sensitive than detection based on gel electrophoresis of PCR products and serological approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Ausubel FM, R Brent, RE Kingston, DD Moore, JG Seidman, JA Smith, and K Struhl (eds). 1992. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Wiley-Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer D, and NC Gudmestad. 1993. Serological detection of nonmucoid strains ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus in potato. Phytopathology 83:157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer D, E Mitzel, J Pasche, and NC Gudmestad. 2001. PCR detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus-infected tuber samples in a plate capture assay. Am J Potato Res 78:269–277.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoni G, and D Mills 1987. A simple method to monitor growth of bacterial populations in leaf tissue. Phytopathology 77:832–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borovkov AY, and MI Rivkin. 1997. XcmI-containing vector for direct cloning of PCR products. BioTechniques 22:812–814.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley CF, and SH De Boer. 1982. Non-pathogenic bacteria associated with potato stems cross-react withCorynebacterium sepedonicum antisera in immunofluorescence. Am Potato J 60:661–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH, and RJ Copeman. 1980. Bacterial ring rot testing with the indirect fluorescent antibody staining procedure. Am Potato J 57:457465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH, LJ Ward, X Li, and S Chittaranjan. 1995. Attenuation of PCR inhibition in the presence of plant compounds by addition of BLOTTO. Nucleic Acid Res 23:2567–2568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH, and A Wieczorek. 1984. Production of monoclonal antibodies toCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Phytopathology 74:1431–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer SH, A Wieczorek, and A Kummer. 1988. An ELISA test for bacterial ring rot of potato with a new monoclonal antibody. Plant Disease 72:874–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinesen IG, and SH De Boer 1995. Extraction ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus from composite samples of potato tubers. Am Potato J 72:133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firrao G, and R Locci. 1994. Identification ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.spedonicus using the polymerase chain reaction. Can J Microbiol 40:148–151.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, and SH De Boer. 1995. Selection of polymerase chain reaction primers from an RNA intergenic spacer region of specific detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus. Phytopathology 85:837–842.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, and BW Russell. 1997. A PCR ELISA-based detection method using three unique DNA fragments specific forClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus Am Potato J 74:449. (abst.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, BW Russell, and JW Hanus. 1997. Specific detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus by amplification of three unique DNA sequences isolated by subtraction hybridization. Phytopathology 87:853–861.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rademaker JLW, and JD Janse 1994. Detection and identification ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus andClavibacter michiganensis subsp.michiganensis by nonradioactive hybridization, polymerase chain reaction, and restriction enzyme analysis. Can J Microbiol 40:1007–1018.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sambrook J, EF Fritsch, and T Maniatis. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad NW, Y Berthier-Schaad, A Sechler, and D Knorr. 1999. Detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus in potato tubers by BIO-PCR and an automated real-time fluorescence detection system. Plant Disease 83:1095–1100.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaad NW, SS Cheong, S Tamaki, E Hatziloukas, and NJ Panopoulos. 1995. A combined biological amplification (BIO-PCR) technique to detectPseudomonas syringae pv.phaseolicola in bean seed extracts. Pytopathology 85:243–248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider J, J Zhao, and CS Orser. 1993. Detection ofClavibacter michganensis subsp.sepedonicus by DNA amplification. FEMS Microbiol Lett 109:207–212.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slack SA, A Kelman, and JB Perry. 1979. Comparison of three serodiagnostic assays for detection ofCorynebacterium sepedonicum. Phytopathology 69:186–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza-Dias JAC, P Russo, JA Berti, L Miller, and SA Slack. 1999. Simplified extraction method for ELISA and PCR detection of potato leafroll luteovirus primary infection in dormant potato tubers. Am J Potato Res. 76:209–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver AK. 1967. Synthetic and complex media for the rapid detection of fluorescence of phytopathogenicPseudomonads: Effect of the carbon source. Appl Microbiol 15:1523–1524.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weller SA, JG Elphinstone, NC Smith, N Boonham, and DE Stead. 2000. Detection ofRalstonia solanacearum strains with a quantitative, multiple, real-time, fluorogenic PCR (TaqMan) assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:2853–2858.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dallice Mills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, D., Russell, B.W. Parameters for specific detection ofClavibacter michiganensis subsp.sepedonicus in potato stems and tubers by multiplexed PCR-ELISA. Am. J. Pot Res 80, 223–233 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855358

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855358

Additional Key Words

Navigation