Skip to main content
Log in

Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes caused byPseudomonas solanacearum

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Microbial antagonism was investigated as a possible method for control of bacterial wilt of potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.), caused byPseudomonas solanacearum. Seed potato tubers were treated with a selected antagonistic bacterial isolate and coated with CaCO3. An amendment was also prepared, containing the same bacterial isolate. The bacterium used as a biological control and designated as isolate BC8 caused strong inhibition ofP solanacearum in both “in vitro” assays and growth cabinet conditions. In order to test the antagonistic capacity of isolate BC8 under field conditions, a completely randomized design was established in a soil naturally infested withP. solanacearum that included 12 treatments repeated 10 times, each one with 5 replications. The field experiment was planted on November 26, 1986 and the rate of wilt symptoms for each treatment was recorded periodically. Three tubers from each plant in each treatment were assayed for either presence ofP. solanacearum or the antagonistic isolate BC8. Treatments that included isolate BC8 gave the lowest amount of wilted plants and fewest tubers latently infected as well. Using this system, about 80% of the tubers assayed from plants growing in the naturally infested soil were colonized by the antagonistic isolate BC8 and free ofP. solanacearum. It was established that the pathogen was still present in the soil after 2 years of non-potato cropping and that latent infections play an important role in the dispersal ofP. solanacearum. The system of delivering bacteria in an amendment, as used in this work, proved to be much more efficient in the biological control ofP. solanacearum than just coating the seed potato tubers with the antagonistic isolate BC8.

Compendio

Antagonismo microbiano fue investigado como posible método para controlar la marchitez bacteriana en papas (Solanum tuberosum L.), causada porPseudomonas solanacearum. Tubérculos semillas de papas fueron tratados con una cepa antagonista bacteriana seleccionada y cubiertos con CaCO3. También se preparó una enmienda la cual incluía la misma cepa. La bacteria utilizada como control biológico y designada como cepa BC8 indujo una fuerte inhibición deP. solanacearum tanto en ensayos “in vitro” como en pruebas en cámaras climáticas. Para comprobar la capacidad antagonista de la cepa BC8, se estableció un ensayo de campo completamente al azar el cual incluyó 12 tratamientos con 10 repeticiones y cada uno con 5 replicaciones. El ensayo se sembró el 26 de Noviembre de 1986 y periódicamente se tomaron notas sobre el desarrollo de marchitez en cada tratamiento. Tres tubérculos por planta en cada tratamiento fueron analizados tanto para presencia deP. solanacearum como cepa BC8. Los tratamientos que incluyeron la cepa BC8 demostraron la menor incidencia de marchitez y la menor cantidad de infecciones latentes en tubérculos. Utilizando este sitema alrededor del 80% de los tubérculos analizados a partir de plantas en el suelo infestado en forma natural, estaban colonizadas con la cepa BC8 y libres deP. solanacearum. Se estableció que el patógeno estaba aun presente en el suelo despues de 2 años de ausencia de siembra de papa y que las infecciones latentes juegan un rol importante en la diseminación deP. solanacearum. El sitema de esparcir bacterias en una enmienda tal como se uso en este trabajo, fue mucho mas eficiente para controlar biológicamente aP. solanacearum que simplemente peletizar los tubérculos con la cepa antagonista BC8.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Acuña, R. 1985. Caracterizacion de la sintomatologia ocasionada por la marchitez bacteriana en cultivos de la papa en el pais. Resumenes XXXVI Congreso Anual, Sociedad Agronomica de Chile, Noviembre 1985, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broadbent, P., K.F. Baker and Y. Waterworth. 1971. Bacteria and actinomycetes antagonistic to fungal root pathogens in Australian soils. Aust J Biol Sci24: 925–944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Buddenhagen, I.W. 1965. The relation of plant pathogenic bacteria to the soil.In: Ecology of soil borne plant pathogens (K.F. Baker and W.C. Snyder, Eds.). Univ California Press, Berkeley. pp. 269–284.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Buddenhagen, I. and A. Kelman. 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused byPseudomonas solanacearum. Ann Rev Phytopathol 2: 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bustamante, P. 1986. Estudio del efecto inhibitoro dePseudomonas solanacearum. E.F. Smith. Seminario de Investigacion. Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chao, W.L., E.B. Nelson, G.E. Harman and H.C. Hoch. 1986. Colonization of the rhizosphere by biological control agents applied to seeds. Phytopathology 76: 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ciampi, L., P. Bustamante and M. Polette. 1987. Isolation of soil bacteria with inhibitory activity toPseudomonas solanacearum. In: Plant Pathogenic Bacteria (E.L. Civerolo, A. Collmer, R.E. Davis and A.G. Gillaspie, Eds.). Martinus Nihhoff Pub., The Netherlands. pp. 733–739.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ciampi, L., y R. Silva. 1985. Prospeccion dePseudomonas solanacearum en plantas y tuberculos de papa en la Xa. Region (Chile). Agro Sur 13: 91–98.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ciampi, L. 1984. Bacterial wilt of potato in Chile. Plant Disease 58: 22–23.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciampi, L., L. Sequeira and E. French. 1980. Latent infection of potato tubers byPseudomonas solanacearum. Am Potato J 57: 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ciampi, L. 1979. Distribution ofPseudomonas solanacearum in infected potato plants and the establishment of latent infections. University of Wisconsin, Department of Plant Pathology. 121 pp. (PhD Thesis).

  12. Fernandez, C. 1984. Determinacion de la marchitez bacteriana de la papa causada porPseudomonas solanacearum en papa. E.F. Smith. Agriculatura Tecnica (Chile). 44: 173–174.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geels, F.P. and B. Shippers. 1983. Selection of antagonistic fluorescentPseudomonas spp. and their root colonization and persistence following treatment of seed potatoes. Phytopathol Z 108: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Granada, G.A. and L. Sequeira. 1983. A new selective medium forPseudomonas solanacearum. Plant Disease 67: 1084–1088.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Granada, G. and L. Sequeira. 1981. Survival ofPseudomonas solanacearum in the soil, rhizosphere and plants roots. Phytopathology 71: 877.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ho, W.C., L.L. Chern and W.H. Xo. 1981. Some inhibiotory characteristics of soils suppressive toPseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 71: 1138.

    Google Scholar 

  17. International Potato Center. 1984. Potatoes for the developing world. Lima, Peru. 150 pp.

  18. Jackson, M.T. and L.C. Gonzalez. 1981. Persistence ofPseudomonas solanacearum (Race 1) in a naturally infested soil in Costa Rica. Phytopathology 71: 690–693.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kempe, J. and L. Sequeira. 1983. Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes: attempts to induce resistance by treating the tubers with bacteria. Plant Disease 67: 499–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leong, J. 1985. Siderophores: their biochemistry and possible role in the biocontrol of plant pathogens. Ann Rev Phytopathol 24: 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lynch, J.M. andM.H. Ebben. 1986. The use of microorganisms to control plant disease. J App Bacteriol (Symposium Supplement) II5S-126S.

  22. Nesmith, W.C. and S.F. Jenkings, Jr. 1985. Influence of antagonistics and controlled matric potential on the survival ofPseudomonas solanacearum in four North Carolina soils. Phytopathology 75: 1182–1187.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nesmith, W.C. and S.F. Jenkings, Jr. 1983. Survival ofPseudomonas solanacearum in selected North Carolina soils. Phytopathology 73: 1300–1304.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nesmith, W.C. and S.F. Jenkings, Jr. 1979. A selective medium for the isolation and quantification ofPseudomonas solanacearum from soil. Phytopathology 69: 182–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rovira, A.D. and D.C. Sands. 1971. Fluorescent pseudomonads, a residual component in the soil microflora. J Appl Bacteriol 34: 253–259.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaad, N.W. 1980. Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. Am Phytopathol. So. St. Paul, Minnesota. 72 pp.

  27. Xu, G.W. and D.C. Gross. 1986. Selection of fluorescent pseudomonads antagonistic toErwinia carotovora and suppressive to potato seed piece decay. Phytopathology 76: 414–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joint Research Project between the Universidad Austral de Chile (Valdivia) and the Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (La Platina, Santiago). Funds for this study were provided by a Grant from the Asociacion Nacional de Productores de Semillas (ANPROS-Santiago).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ciampi-Panno, L., Fernandez, C., Bustamante, P. et al. Biological control of bacterial wilt of potatoes caused byPseudomonas solanacearum . American Potato Journal 66, 315–332 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854019

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02854019

Additional Key Words

Navigation