Skip to main content
Log in

Softgels: Consumer perceptions and market impact relative to other oral dosage forms

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Softgels, which contain a liquid formulation of a drug, often provide clinical benefit over other solid oral dosage forms and may represent an attractive alternative to them. A consumer preference survey of softgels versus other solid forms investigated four areas: (1) identification of various dosage forms; (2) perception of therapeutic benefit (easiest to swallow, faster-acting, work longer); (3) impact of individual product characteristics on overall product selection; and (4) market impact in terms of premiums consumers would pay on the basis of dosage form. The 300 survey participants strongly preferred clear softgels over other dosage forms in virtually every area. Softgels were perceived as easy to swallow and fast-acting, with a duration of action second only to that of a two-piece capsule. Overall preference was driven by ease of swallowing, and softgels were rated first by the majority of respondents. Consumers would be interested in various products if these were available as softgels rather than in their current oral dosage forms and may be willing to pay a premium for softgel products. This survey confirms consumer preferences for particular dosage forms and for softgels over other solid forms. Pharmaceutical scientists and marketers should consider softgels as alternative dosage forms when developing new compounds or considering life-cycle management of existing products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Patel AG, Gura R, Kurian T, et al. A comparison of the hypnotic effects of temazepam capsules and temazepam elixir.Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991;6:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitsuyasu RT, Skolnik PR, Cohen SR, et al. Activity of the soft gelatin formulation of saquinavir in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naïve patients.AIDS. 1998;12:F103-F109.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Erb R, Stoltman W. Evaluation of two nitroglycerin dosage forms: a metered spray and a soft gelatin capsule.J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1983;11:611–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Astorri E, Bianchi G, La Canna G, et al. Bioavailability and related heart function index of digoxin capsules and tables in cardiac patients.J Pharm Sci. 1979;68:104–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bateman NE, Uccellini DA. Effect of formulation on the bioavailability of retinol, D-alpha-tocopherol and riboflavine.J Pharm Pharmacol. 1984;36:41–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saano V, Paronen P, Peura P, Vidgren M. Relative pharmacokinetics of three oral 400 mg ibuprofen dosage forms in healthy volunteers,Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol. 1991;29:381–385.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SS, Lee SH, Lee YJ, et al. Accelerated oral absorption of gliclazide in human subjects from a soft gelatin capsule containing a PEG 400 suspension of gliclazide.J Controlled Release. 1998:51:195–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jones, W.J., Francis, J.J. Softgels: Consumer perceptions and market impact relative to other oral dosage forms. Adv Therapy 17, 213–221 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853160

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02853160

Keywords

Navigation