Skip to main content
Log in

The scolicidal effects of honey

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Echinococcosis is a zoonosis that is caused by adult or larval tapeworms belonging to the genusEchinococcus. Until now, no studies have sought to determine the scolicidal effects of honey. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to explore the scolicidal effects of honey in different concentrations for various exposure times. Tubes that contained at least 500 protoscolices were supplemented with 1 %, 5%, 10%, 25%, and 50% concentrations of honey. Tubes were maintained at room temperature for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 min. At the end of the incubation times, the viability of protoscolices was assessed through a trypan blue exclusion test. The effective dose of honey was applied intraperitoneally to determine whether it caused an anaphylactic reaction or hyperglycemia. Honey concentrations of 10% or greater killed all protoscolices. The scolicidal effects of honey began at the end of the third minute. Honey did not cause adverse effects when applied intraperitoneally. In this study, an investigation of the scolicidal effects of honey showed that it is highly effective at a 10% concentration. On the basis of in vivo study results, the investigators concluded that honey is a potent scolicidal agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McManus PD, Zhang W, Li J, Bartey PB. Echinococcosis.Lancet. 2003; 362: 1295–1304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwartz SI. Liver. In: Schwartz SI, ed.Principles of Surgery. 7th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1999: 1395–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kayaalp C. Hydatid disease of the liver [Editorial].J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005; 20: 331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Akhan O, Ozmen MN. Percutaneous treatment of liver hydatid cysts.Eur J Radiol. 1999; 32: 76–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orsolic N, Basic I. Antimetastatic effect of honey.Mellifera. 2004; 4: 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zaghlhoul AA, El-Shattawy HH, Kassem AA, Ibrahim EA, Reddy IK, Khan MA. Honey, a prospective antibiotic: extraction, formulation and stability.Pharmazie. 2001; 56: 643–647.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lusby PE, Coombes A, Wilkinson JM. Honey: a potent agent for wound healing?J Wound Care. 2002; 29: 295–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Efem SEE, Udoh KT, Iwara CI. The antimicrobial spectrum of honey: its clinical significance.Infection. 1992; 20: 227–229.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper RA, Halas E, Molan PC. The efficacy of honey in inhibiting stains ofPseudomonas aeruginosa from infected burns.J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002; 23: 366–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Osato M, Reddy SG, Graham DY. Osmotic effect of honey on growth and viability ofHelicobacter pylori.Dig Dis Sci. 1999; 44: 462–464.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Molan PC. The antibacterial activity of honey.Bee World. 1992; 73: 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aljadi AM, Yusoff KM. Isolation and identification of phenolic acids in Malaysian honey with antibacterial properties.Turk J Med Sci. 2003; 33: 229–236.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sayek I, Tirnaksiz MB, Dogan R. Cyst hydatid disease: current trends in diagnosis and management.Surg Today. 2004; 34: 987–996.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smego RA, Sebanego P. Treatment options for hepatic cyst echinococcosis.Int J Infect Dis. 2005; 9: 69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kayaalp C, Balkan M, Aydin C, et al. Hypertonic saline in hydatid disease.World J Surg. 2001; 25: 975–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buttenschoen K, Carli Buttenschoen D. Echinococcus granulosus infection: the challenge of surgical treatment.Arch Surg. 2003; 388: 218–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Altindis M, Arikan Y, Cetinkaya Z, et al. Octenidine hydrochloride in hydatid disease.J Invest Surg. 2004; 17: 41–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Landa Garcia JI, Alonso E, Gonzalez-Uriarte J, Rodriguez Romano D. Evaluation of scolicidal agents in an experimental hydatid disease model.Eur Surg Res. 1997; 29: 202–208.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Biriukov IV, Streliaeva AV, Sadykov VM, Tursunov BS, Rasulov SM, Kovalenko FP. Treatment of hydatid cysts’ residual cavities (experimental and clinical study).Khirurgiia. 2000; 5: 27–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aysan E, Ayar E, Aren A, Cifter C. The role of intra-peritoneal honey administration in preventing post-operative peritoneal adhesions.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct Biol. 2002; 104: 152–155.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kilicoglu, B., Kismet, K., Koru, O. et al. The scolicidal effects of honey. Adv Therapy 23, 1077–1083 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850228

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850228

Keywords

Navigation