Skip to main content
Log in

Study of molecular motions in liquids by electron spin-lattice relaxation measurements, I: Semiquinone ions in hydrogen bonding solvents

  • Solids
  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electron spin-lattice relaxation times (T 1) of a variety of semiquinone ions in hydrogen bonding solvents have been measured by the pulsed saturation recovery technique as a function of temperature (T) and viscosity (η) of the solvent. Also linewidths (ΔH) have been measured in suitable cases in such solvents at low radical concentrations (∼10−4 M). It is observed that (i) the temperature and viscosity dependence ofT 1 can be fitted to an equation of the form 1/T 1=A(T/η)+Bexp(-ΔE/RT) whereA andB are constants and ΔE is an activation energy of the order of 1 kcal mole−1 for these systems; (ii)T 1 is essentially independent of the radical concentration within the range 10−3 to 5×10−2 M; (iii) the concentration independent part of the linewidth (ΔH) increases linearly with (η/T) at sufficiently low temperatures, and (iv) the (η/T) dependent part ofT 1 is sensitive to the size of the semiquinone as well as that of the solvent molecule, whereas the linewidth which is proportional to (η/T) at high viscosity, low temperature region is not sensitive to the size of the semiquinone and that of the solvent. Based on these observations, it is postulated that in hydrogen bonding solvents, three types of motion contribute significantly to electron spin relaxation:

  1. (a)

    A restricted small step diffusional motion, not involving large changes in the orientation of the molecule, leading to the dominant viscosity dependent contributions toT 1 and ΔH, due to spin rotation interaction;

  2. (b)

    a large amplitude reorientation of the semiquinone, coupled to translational diffusion, resulting in viscosity dependent contributions toT 1 and ΔH, throughg-modulation;

  3. (c)

    a hindred rotation of the semiquinone within the solvent cage, contributing toT 1 due to spin rotation interaction.

The fact thatT 1 is not sensitive to the concentration of the radicals, is ascribed to the formation of the solvent cage that prevents the close approach of radicals, thereby rendering radical-radical interactions to be weak mechanisms for relaxation, even at relatively high radical concentrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloembergen N, Purcell E M and Pound R V 1948Phys. Rev. 73 679

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Brown R J C, Gutowsky H S and Shimomura K 1963J. Chem. Phys. 38 76

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrasekhar S 1946Rev. Mod. Phys. 15 1

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Connor H 1972 Ph.D. Thesis (Cornell University), p. 63

  • Debye P 1945Polar molecules (New York: Dover) p. 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman M P, Kooser R G, Das M R and Freed J H 1969J. Chem. Phys. 51 2690

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Eyring H and Ree T 1958 “Relaxation Theory of Transport Phenomena” ch. 3, vol. 2,Rheology ed Frederick R Eirich (New York; Academic Press) p. 83

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel J 1946Kinetic theory of Liquids (New York: Dover) p. 202

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gierer A and Wirtz K 1953Z. Naturforsch. 8 a 532

    Google Scholar 

  • Handbook of chemistry and physics 1971 –72 52nd edition ed Robert C Weast (Ohio: Chemical Rubber Publishing Co.) p. F-37

  • Huang R and Kivelson D 1972Pure Appl. Chem. 32 207

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard P S 1958Phys. Rev. 109 1153; 1963Phys. Rev. 131 1155

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov E N 1963Zh. Eskp. Teor. Fiz. 45 1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Khakhar M P, Prabhananda B S and Das M R 1966J. Chem. Phys. 45 2327

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivelson D 1960J. Chem. Phys. 33 1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamoorthy M V and Venkataraman B 1967Indian J. Pure Appl. Phys. 5 325

    Google Scholar 

  • Leniart D S 1971 Ph.D. Thesis (Cornell University) p. 50

  • Lingam K V, Nair P G and Venkataraman B 1972Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 76 207

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell H M 1956J. Chem. Phys. 25 709

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg G 1967Mol. Phys. 12 69

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly D E and Schacher G E 1963J. Chem. Phys. 39 1768 (Also see: O’Reilly D E 1968J. Chem. Phys. 49 5416; O’Reilly D E and Peterson E M 1971J. Chem. Phys. 55 2155; O’Reilly D E 1972J. Chem. Phys. 57 885)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Rengan S K, Khakhar M P, Prabhananda B S and Venkataraman B 1972a Pure Appl. Chem. 32 287; 1972b Proc. Nucl. Phys. Solid StatePhys. Symp. Bombay14 C 231

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs J W H and Fraenkel G K 1960J. Chem. Phys. 34 756

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Stephen M J and Fraenkel G K 1960J. Chem. Phys. 32 1435

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Spernol A and Wirtz K 1953Z. Naturfosch. 8 a 522

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland G B B M 1905Phil. Mag. 9 781

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans J 1959The Physico-chemical constants of binary systems in concentrated solutions Vol.2 (New York: Interscience Publishers Inc.), p. 1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataraman B 1956 Ph.D. Thesis (Columbia University) p. 9

  • Zandstra P J 1964J. Chem. Phys. 41 3655

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rengan, S.K., Khakhar, M.P., Prabhananda, B.S. et al. Study of molecular motions in liquids by electron spin-lattice relaxation measurements, I: Semiquinone ions in hydrogen bonding solvents. Pramana - J. Phys 3, 95–121 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02847118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02847118

Keywords

Navigation