Skip to main content
Log in

A probabilistic model for joint-movements in jointed concrete pavement

  • Higway Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstracts

Joint movement can be considered to be the result of horizontal movements of adjacent slabs to a joint. Slab movements are caused by the change of slab temperature and moisture level, and are resisted by subbase friction. The AASHTO model assumes that slab length equal to joint spacing. However this assumption is valid only if there are no penetrated transverse cracks between joints, and mechanistic discontinuity at every joint is satisfied. The occurrence of joint freezing and transverse cracking causes the variation of integrated slab length (ISL) in a given pavement section. And the variation of ISL may cause the variation of the magnitude of joint movement. But these have not yet been considered in the estimation of joint opening. In this study, a model (Lee-Stoffels model) is proposed to predict the probability of the magnitude of joint opening. In the Lee Stoffels model, joint freezing and transverse cracking is considered as factors to induce the variation of joint movement in a given pavement. The probability of a pair of ISLs adjacent to a joint is estimated based on the probabilities and distribution characteristics of joint freezing and transverse cracks for a given pavement section. The magnitude of joint opening is calculated by using a mechanistic model (SSM Program) for the given pair of ISLs (distances from a joint to adjacent mechanistic discontinuity). The Lee-Stoffels model is validated based on the comparison between predicted and measured joint openings in sixteen the Long Term Performance Pavement Seasonal Monitoring Program (LTPP SMP) pavement sections. The Lee-Stoffels model has advantages over the AASHTO model, since it is capable of estimating the magnitude of joint opening along with its probability. The reasonably largest joint opening (joint opening at the 90th to 95th percentile) estimated from Lee-Stoffels model may be used as a better criterion for joint seal design maintenance than the estimation of joint opening based on the AASHTO model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (1986). “AASHTO guide for design of pavement structures 1986.”

  • Bodocsi A., Minkarah, I., and Rajagopal S.A. (1993). “Analysis of horizontal movements of joint and cracks in portland cement concrete pavements,” Transportation Research Record 1392, Transportation Research Board, pp. 43–52.

  • Foster S. (1998). “HIPERPAV: A User-Freindly Tool to Help US Build IT Right” Public Roads May/June.

  • Hoerner, T.E., Tarr, S.M., Darter, M.I., and Okamoto, P.A. (1999). “Guide to developing performance-related specifications for PCC pavements, Volume III,” FHWA-RD-98-171, Federal Highway Administration, Feb.

  • Lee, S.W. (2000).Horizontal joint movements in rigid pavements, Ph.D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University.

  • Lee, S.W. (2001). “Behavior of concerete slab under frictional drag”,KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 5 No. 2.

  • Lee, S.W. and Stoffels, S.M. (2001). “Analysis of in-situ joint movement in rigid pavement,” Transportation Research Record, No. 1778.

  • McGhee K.H. (1995). NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 211, “Design, construction, and maintenance of PCC pavement joints,” Transportation Research Board.

  • Minkarah, I., Cook, J.P., McDonough, J.F., and Jaghoory, S. (1982). “Effect of different variables on horizontal movement on concrete pavement,” ACI SP-70, pp. 784–806.

  • Morian, D.A. and Stoffels S.M. (1999). “Evaluation of rigid pavement joint seal movement,”Transportation Research Board 78 th Annual Meeting, Washington D.C.

  • Ray K.G. (1986). “Pavement joint sealing where are we and how did we get here?”Second World Congress on Joints and Bearings, Volume 1, American Concrete Institute.

  • Shober, S.F. (1986). “Portland cement concrete pavement performance as influenced by sealed and unsealed contraction joints”, Transportation Search Record 1083, Transportation Research Board.

  • Yu, H.T., Smith, K.D., Darter, M.I., Jiang, J., and Khazanovich, L. (1998). “Performance of concrete pavements, Volume III improving concrete pavement performance,” FHWA-RD-95-111, Federal Highway Administration, Jun.

  • Wilde, W.J., Rasmussen, R.O., Zollinger, D.G. (1998). “Application of fracture mechanics to early-age crack control of thick portland cement concrete pavements.”Proceedings of the 25 th Air transportation Conference, ASCE, pp. 388–402, June, Austin, Texas.

  • Yu, H.T., Smith, K.D., Darter, M.I., Jiang, J., and Khazanovich, L. (1998). “Performance of concrete pavements, Volume III improving concrete pavement performance,” FHWA-RD-95-111, Federal Highway Administration, Jun.

  • Zollinger, D.G., Tang, T. and Xin, D. (1994). “Sawcut depth considerations for jointed concrete pavement based on fracture mechanics analysis,” Transportation Research Record No. 1449, Transportation Research Board, pp. 91–100.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The manuscript for this paper was submitted for review on September 26, 2002.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, SW. A probabilistic model for joint-movements in jointed concrete pavement. KSCE J Civ Eng 7, 141–146 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02841972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02841972

Keywords

Navigation