Accuracy of expiratory carbon dioxide measurements using the coaxial and circle breathing circuits in small subjects

Abstract

Mass spcctrometry is widely used to measure the end-tidal concentrations of inhalation anesthetics and other gases during surgery in order to estimate their arterial concentrations. When certain breathing circuits are used in newborns, however, fresh gas or ambient air may contaminate the expired sample, introducing a systematic error in the measurement of any end-tidal gas concentration. We estimated this error in newborn piglets using carbon dioxide as an indicator substance of expired gas. The capnograms and the difference between arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO₂) and peakexpired carbon dioxide tension (PeCO₂) were compared when either a coaxial (Bain) or circle breathing circuit was used. Gas was sampled from the proximal airway and distal trachea. No combination of circuit and sampling site produced a flat alveolar phase until the circle circuit was modified with diversion valves to reduce gas mixing. The mean PaCO₂-PeCO₂ gradients using the coaxial/proximal sampling, coaxial/distal sampling, and modified circle/proximal sampling circuits were 12.4, 9.2, and 8.8 mm Hg, respectively. The mean PeCO₂ in each of these combinations was significantly different from the corresponding mean PaCO₂ (p<0.05). Using the modified circle circuit with distal sampling, mean PeCO₂ was not significantly different from mean PaCO₂: the mean PaCO₂-PcCO₂ gradient was 2.2 ± 0.2 mm Hg (SEM), range, 0 to 6 mm Hg, with 95% confidence limits ⩽ 8 mm Hg. When a coaxial breathing circuit is used in small subjects, PaCO₂ may be significantly underestimated regardless of sampling site, although the circle breathing circuit with distal tracheal sampling yields accurate results.