Abstract
In recent years, scholars have attempted to understand the role of information in policymaking by developing several models of information utilization and have tested them empirically, at both national and state levels. This paper has called into question past studies as they relate to describing and explaining use of information. This paper tests an integrated model of information utilization that contains four sets of primary variables: decision makers’ environments (i.e., nature of policy issues), organization, individual characteristics, and characteristics of information. Based on the conceptual framework, a path model is built and tested against data about knowledge utilization and policy change in two areas of mental health policy (i.e., service and financing). The findings of the study have demonstrated that decision makers’ behavior does not conform to the assumptions put forward by either the organizational interest (e.g., information source or content of information) or the communications perspective (e.g., decision makers’ attitudes toward social science research). Instead, we have shown that information utilization is affected directly and indirectly by a variety of factors and their linkage, and not dominated by one set of factors that is defined by a singe perspective. The most important paths in the model are those between factors associated with information (e.g., the amount of information received or information source) and the use of information. Interestingly, these factors also play the role of major intervening mechanisms for linking other factors to decision makers’ use of information. More importantly, the general pattern of the findings indicates that policy areas make a difference in the process of information utilization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allison, G.T. (1972).Essence of decision. Boston: John Wiley & Sons.
Asher, H.B. (1983).Causal modeling. Beverley Hills: SAGE.
Bardach, E. (1984). The dissemination of social science research.Knowledge, 6:125–45.
Biernacki, P. and D. Waldorf (1981). Snowballing method.Sociological Methods and Research, 10:141–63.
Bollen, K.A., (1989).Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bourgeois L.J. III, (1980). Strategy and environment.Academy of Management, 5:25–39.
Bozeman, B. and S. Bretschneider (1986). Public management information system: Theory and practice.Public Administration Review, (special issue):475–87.
Brewer, G.D. (1973).Politicians, bureaucrats, and the consultants. New York: Basic Books.
Calvert, Randall L. (1985). The value of biased information: A rational choice model of political advice.Journal of Politics, 47:530–55.
Caplan, N. (1979). The two communities theory and knowledge utilization.American Behavioral Scientist, 22:459–70.
Chelimsky, E. (1987). The politics of program evaluation.Society, 25:24–32.
Ciarlo, James, Ed. (1980).Utilizing evaluation. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Cleary, Paul D. and R. Angel (1984). The analysis of relationships involving dichotomous variables.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 25:334–48.
Comfort, Louise K. (1992). A dynamic model of organizational learning and action. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, (September 3–6).
Corwin, R.G. and K.S. Louis (1982). Organizational barriers to the utilization of research.Administrative Science Quarterly, 27:623–40.
Davis, J.A., (1985).The logic of causal order. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Demartini, J. and L. Whitbeck (1987). Sources of knowledge for practice.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23:219–31.
Denhardt, R. (1993).Theories of public organization. New York:Wadsworth.
Dunn, W.N. (1980). The two communities metaphor and models of knowledge use.Knowledge, 1:515–37.
Feldman, Martha S. and J.G. March (1981). Decision in organizations and theories of choice. In A. Van de Ven and W.J. Joyce (Eds.),Prescripts on organizational design and performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Fredrickson, J. (1984). The comprehensiveness of strategic decision processes.Academy of Maanagement Journal, 27:445–66.
Halperin, M. (1974). Shaping the flow of information. In F. Rourke (Ed.),Bureaucratic power in national politics. Boston: Little, Brown.
Henry, N. (1995).Public administration and public affairs (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Huberman, M. (1987). Steps toward an integrated model of research utilization.Knowledge, 8:586–611.
Huberman, M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situational analysis of routine knowledge use in schools.Knowledge, 4:478–510.
Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under uncertainty.Econometirics, 47:150–70.
King, G. (1991). Truth is stranger than prediction, more questionable than causal inference.American Journal of Political Science, 35:1124–135.
Kirkpatrick, S.A. et al. (1976). The process of political decisionmaking in groups: Search behavior and choice shifts.American Behavioral Scientist, 20:680–700.
Knott, Jack and A. Wildavsky (1981). If dissemination is the solution, what is the problem? In R.F. Rich (Ed.),The knowledge cycle. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Larsen, J.K. (1981). Knowledge utilization: Current issues. In R. Rich (Ed.),The knowledge cycle. Beverley Hills: SAGE.
Levigton, C. and E.F.X. Hughes (1981). Research on the utilization of evaluation.Evaluation Review, 5:525–48.
Luskin, Robert C. (1991). Abuses non tolit usum: Standardized coefficients, correlation, and R2s.American Journal of Political Science, 35:1032–1046.
MacRae, D. and J.A. Wilde (1979).Policy analysis for public decisions. North Situate: Duxbury Press.
Majone, G. (1989).Evidence, arguments, and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mandell, M.B., and V.L. Sauter (1984). Approaches to the study of information utilization in public agencies.Knowledge, 6:145–64.
March, James G., and H.A. Simon (1958).Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Mealia, L., and D. Lee (1979). An alternative to macro-micro contingency theory.Academy of Management Review, 4:333–45.
Meltsner, A. (1976).Policy analysis in the bureaucracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mintzberg, H. (1979).The structuring of organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Nachmias, C., and C. Ridgeway (1986). Attitude measure in evaluation research.Policy Studies Review, 5:756–68.
Nachmias, D. (1980). The Role of evaluation in public policy.Policy Studies Journal 8:1163–1169.
Nelson, C.E. et al. (1987). The utilization of social science information by policy makers.American Behavioral Scientist, 30:569–77.
Oh, C.H. (1992). Rationality, organizational interest, and information searching in bureaucracies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Society for Public Administration, Chicago, IL (April 13–15).
Patton, M.Q. (1978).Utilization-focused evaluation. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Peterson, Steven A. (1985). Neurophysiology, cognition, and political thinking.Political Psychology, 6:150–70.
Pierce, J.C. et al. (1987). Environmental policy elites’ trust of information sources.American Behavioral Scientist, 30:250–70.
Pollard, W. E. (1987). Decision making and the use of evaluation research.American Behavioral Scientist, 30:661–76.
Quadrel, M., and R. Rich (1989). Information selection in the House of Representatives.Knowledge, 11:123–54.
Rich, R.F. (1979). The pursuit of knowledge.Knowledge, 1:6–30.
Rich, R.F. (1991). Knowledge creation, dissemination, and utilization.Knowledge, 12:319–37.
Rich, R.F., and C.H. Oh (1993). The utilization of policy research. In S. Nagel (Ed.),Encyclopedia of policy studies (2nd ed). New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Rogers, E.M. (1990). Promoting deliberation. Paper presented at the conference on Understanding and Improving Public Decisionmaking, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, (April 19–20).
Rossi, P. and H.E. Freeman (1984).Evaluation. Newbury Park: SAGE.
Schneider, Anne L. (1986). The evaluation of a policy orientation for evaluation research.Public Administration Review (July/August):356–63.
Shrivastava, P. (1985). Knowledge systems for strategic decisionmaking.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 2:95–107.
Simon, Herbert A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science.American Political Science Review, 79:293–304.
Stolzenberg, Ross M. (1980). The measurement and decomposition of causal effects in nonlinear and nonadditive models. In K.F. Schussler (Ed.),Sociological methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decision.Journal of Business, 84:251–78
Van de Vall, Mark and C. Bolas (1981). Internal vs. external social policy research.Knowledge, 2:461–81.
Van Lohuizen, C.W. (1986). Knowledge management and policymaking.Knowledge, 8:12–38.
Webber, D. (1987). Legislators’ use of policy information.American Behavioral Scientist, 30:612–31.
Weick, Karl E. (1977). Enactment processes in organizations. In B.M. Staw and G.R. Salancik (Eds.),New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago: St. Clair Press, Chapter 8.
Weiss, C.E. (1981). The use of social science research. In H. Stein (Ed.),Organizations and the human services. Philadelphia: The Temple University Press.
Weiss, C. and M. Bucuvalas (1980).Social science research and decision making. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Winship, C. and R.D. Mare (1983). Structural equations and path analysis for discrete data.American Journal of Sociology, 89:94–110.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, C.H., Rich, R.F. Explaining use of information in public policymaking. Knowledge and Policy 9, 3–35 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832231
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02832231