Skip to main content
Log in

Status of toxoplasma antibodies in recurrent fetal loss in U.A.E. women

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective analysis to determine the status of toxoplasma (IgG & IgM) antibodies in UAE women with recurrent fetal loss was done using immunofluorescence assay. Two thousand three hundred and fourty three patients with one or more fetal loss were studied over a period of five years.

In patients with fetal loss, the range of toxoplasma IgG seropositivity varied from 24.2–30.6%. There were 3 patients with IgM positive. Only in a single patient one of her two abortions could be attributed to acute toxoplasmosis.

Habitual fetal loss cannot be attributed to chronic toxoplasmosis. Also, 67.2% of the women of child bearing age group in U.A.E were found to be seronegative, highlighting the need for routine antenatal screening to detect primary acute toxoplasmosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WHO publication. Report. of the WHO consultation on Public Health Aspects of Toxoplasmosis.WHO/CDS/VPH. 1988; 74: 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Galvan Remirez M de la L, Soto Mancilla JL, Velasco Castrejon O, Perez Medina, RRev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1995; 29 (4): 333–337.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sahwi SY, Zaki MS, Haiba NY, Elsaid OK, Anwar MY, AbdRabbo SA.J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 21 (2): 145–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Garin JP, Ambroise Thomas P, Cornet A, Kien Troung Thai, Despeignes,J Rev Instpasteur Lyon 1967–1968; 1: 179–205.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stray-Pederson B. Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy.Bailliere’s Clinical Obs and Gynaecol 1993, 7: 107–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee RV. Parasites and pregnancy: the problems of malaria and toxoplasmosis.Clin Periatol 1988 15 : 351–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Daffos F, Forestier F, Capella-Pavlovsky Met al. Prenatatl management of 746 p/egnancies at risk for congenital toxoplasmosisN Engl J Med 1988; 318: 271–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Desmonts G, Daffos, F, Forestier F, Capella Pavloysky M, Thuliez P, Chartier M. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital Toxoplasmosis.Lancet 1985; 1: 500–504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mitchell CD, Erlich SE, Mastrucci MTet al. Congenital toxoplasmosis occurring in infants perinatally infected with human immunodeficiency virus 2.Pediatr Infect Dis J ;1990; 9: 512–518.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bessieres MH, Roques C and Seuela JP. Suggestion of a protocol to pervent congenital Toxoplasrnosis in tropical area.Bulletin de la Socite de Pathologie exitique et des ses Filiales. 1985; 78: 815–820.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lappalainen M, Koskel P, Hedman Ket al. Incidence of pfimary toxplasma infection during pregnancy in Southern Finland.Scand J infeist Dis. 1992; 24: 97–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alfors K Borjeson M. Huldt Get al. Incidence of Toxoplasmosis in pregnant women in the city of Malmo, Sweden,Scand J of Infect Dis. 1989; 21: 313–321.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Carter AO and Frank JW. Congenital Toxoplasmosis: epidemiological features and control.Canadian Med Assoc J 1986; 135: 618–623.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guerina NG, Ho-Wen Hsu, Meissner HCet al. Neonatal serologic screening and early treatment for congenitalToxoplasma gondii infection.N Eng J Med 1994; 330: 1858–1863.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall SM. Congenitar ToxopiasmosisBr Med J 1992; 305: 291–297.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, N. Status of toxoplasma antibodies in recurrent fetal loss in U.A.E. women. Indian J Pediatr 65, 891–897 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02831357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02831357

Key words

Navigation