Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of present SST gravity field models

  • Published:
Geo-spatial Information Science

Abstract

Taking the main land of Europe as the region to be studied, the potential of the new satellite gravity technique: satellite-to-satellite tracking (SST) and improving the accuracy of regional gravity field model with the SST models are investigated. The drawbacks of these models are discussed. With GPM98C as the reference, the gravity anomaly residuals of several other models, the latest SST global gravity field models (EIGEN series and GGM series), were computed and compared. The results of the comparison show that in the selected region, some systematic errors with periodical properties exist in the EIGEN and GGM's S series models in the high degree and order. Some information that was not shown in the classic gravity models is detected in the low and middle degree and order of EIGEN and GGM's S series models. At last, the effective maximum degrees and orders of SST models are suggested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tapley B, Ries, S, Bettadpur D, et al. (2005) GGM02: an improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE[J].Journal of Geodesy, 79(8):467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reigber C, Schmidt R, Flechtner F, et al. (2005) An Earth gravity field model complete to degree and order 150 from GRACE: EIGEN-GRACE025 [J].Journal of Geodynamics, 39(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemoine F G, Kenyon S C, Factor J K, et al. (1998) The development of the Joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96[R]. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wenzel G (1998) Ultra high degree geopotential models GPM98A, B and C to degree 1 800[C]. Joint Meeting of the International Gravity Commission and International Geoid Commission, Trieste

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40574005, No. 40304001; No. 40374006; No. 40234039).

About this article

Cite this article

Jia, L., Chuang, S., Xiancai, Z. et al. Comparison of present SST gravity field models. Geo-spat. Inf. Sci. 9, 175–179 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02826763

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02826763

Key Words

CLC Number

Navigation