Abstract
Over the past century, the distribution and abundance ofPhragmites australis (common reed) has dramatically increased in both freshwater and brackish wetlands throughout North America. It has been hypothesized that the increased competitive ability ofPhragmites could be the result of an introduction of a more aggressive genotype. Sequence data from 2 noncoding regions of the chloroplast genome show that, historically, 11 native haplotypes were found across North America and population-structuring distinguishing samples from the Atlantic Coast, Midwest, West, and Gulf Coast regions of the continent was evident. Today a single genetically-distinct haplotype dominates the Atlantic Coast and is also found across the continent in lower frequencies; this type is common in Europe and Asia and has most likely been introduced to North America. Comparisons of modern populations with historic samples show that along the Atlantic Coast, this cosmopolitan type has replaced native haplotypes and it is invading new sites throughout the rest of the country. In the Midwest and West, native populations are still common but introduced populations are found along roadsides throughout the area. Gulf Coast populations are dominated by another population type that is genetically distinct from all other North American population types.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Bertness, M. D., P. J. Ewanchuk, andB. R. Silliman. 2002. Anthropogenic modification of New England salt marsh landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 99: 1395–1398.
Castelloe, J., andA. R. Templeton. 1994. Root probabilities for intraspecific gene trees under neutral coalescent theory.Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 3:102–113.
Chambers, R. M., L. A. Meyerson, andK. Saltonstall. 1999. Expansion ofPhragmites australis into tidal wetlands of North America.Aquatic Botany 64:261–273.
Clement, M., D. Posada, andK. A. Crandall. 2000. TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies.Molecular Ecology 9:1657–1660.
Clevering, O. A., andJ. Lissner. 1999. Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics ofPhragmites australis.Aquatic Botany 64:185–208.
Djebrouni, M.. 1992. Variabilité morphologique, caryologique et enzymatique chez quelques populations dePhragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica 27: 49–59.
Doyle, J. J., andE. E. Dickson. 1987. Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis.Taxon 36:715–722.
Dumolin-Lapeque, S., B. Demesure, S. Fineschi, V. L. Corre, andR. J. Petit. 1997. Phylogeographic structure of white oaks throughout the European continent.Genetics 146:1475–1487.
Fournier, W., D. P. Hauber, andD. A. White. 1995. Evidence of infrequent sexual propagation ofPhragmites australis throughout the Mississippi River delta.American Journal of Botany 82:71.
Goman, M., andL. Wells. 2000. Trends in river flow affecting the northeastern reach of the San Francisco Bay estuary over the past 7,000 years.Quaternary Research 54:206–217.
Hamilton, M. B. 1999. Four primer pairs for the amplification of chloroplast intergenic regions with intraspecific variation.Molecular Ecology 8:513–525.
Hansen, R. M. 1978. Shasta ground sloth food habits, Rampart Cave, Arizona.Paleobiology 4:302–319.
Hauber, D. P., D. A. White, S. P. Powers, andF. R. De-Francesch. 1991. Isozyme variation and correspondence with unusual infrared reflectance patterns inPhragmites australis (Poaceae).Plant Systematics and Evolution 178:1–8.
Keller, B. E. M. 2000. Genetic variation among and within populations ofPhragmites australis in the Charles River watershed.Aquatic Botany 66:195–208.
Koppitz, H. 1999. Analysis of genetic diversity among selected populations ofPhragmites australis worldwide.Aquatic Botany 64:209–221.
Koppitz, H., H. Kuehl, K. Hesse, andJ. G. Kohl. 1997. Some aspects of the importance of genetic diversity inPhragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel for the development of reed stands.Botanica Acta 110:217–223.
Lynch, E. A., andK. Saltonstall. 2002. Paleoecological and genetic analyses provide evidence for recent expansion of nativePhragmites australis populations in a Lake Superior wetland.Wetlands, 22:637–646.
Marks, M., B. Lapin, andJ. Randall 1994.Phragmites australis (P. communis): Threats, management, and monitoring.Natural Areas Journal 14:285–294.
McCauley, D. E. 1995. The use of chloroplast DNA polymorphism in studies of gene flow in plants.Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10:198–202.
Meyerson, L. A., K. Saltonstall, L. M. Windham, E. Kiviat, andS. Findlay. 2000. A comparison ofPhragmites australis in freshwater and brackish marsh environments in North America.Wetlands Ecology and Management 8:89–103.
Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Columbia University Press, New York.
Niering, W. A., R. S. Warren, andC. G. Weymouth. 1977. Our dynamic tidal marshes: Vegetation changes as revealed by peat analysis.Connecticut Arboretum Bulletin 12:22.
Ohsako, T., andO. Ohnishi. 2000. Intra- and interspecific phylogeny of wildFagopyrum (Polygonaceae) species based on nucleotide sequences of noncoding regions in chloroplast DNA.American Journal of Botany 87:573–582.
Orson, R. 1999. A paleoecological assessment ofPhragmites australis in New England tidal marshes: Changes in plant community structure during the last millennium.Biological Invasions 1:149–158.
Pellegrin, D., andD. P. Hauber. 1999. Isozyme variation among populations of the clonal species,Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel.Aquatic Botany 63:241–259.
Powell, W., M. Morgante, C. Andre, J. W. McNicol, G. C. Machray, J. J. Doyle, S. V. Tingey, andJ. A. Rafalski. 1995. Hypervariable microsatellites provide a general source of polymorphic DNA markers for the chloroplast genome.Current Biology 5:1023–1029.
Raymond, M., andF. Rousset. 1995. An exact test for population differentiation.Evolution 49:1280–1283.
Roman, C. T., W. A. Niering, andR. S. Warren. 1984. Salt marsh vegetation changes in response to tidal restrictions.Environmental Management 8:141–150.
Saltonstall, K. 2001. A set of primers for amplification of noncoding regions of chloroplast DNA in the grasses.Molecular Ecology Notes 1:76–78.
Saltonstall, K. 2002. Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed,Phragmites australis, into North America.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U.S.A. 99:2445–2449.
Schneider, S., D. Roessli, andL. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin version 2.000: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Soltis, D. E., M. A. Gitzendanner, D. D. Strenge, andP. S. Soltis. 1997. Chloroplast DNA intraspecific phylogeography of plants from the Pacific Northwest of North America.Plant Systematics and Evolution 206:353–373.
Stalter, R. 1975.Phragmites communis in South Carolina.Rhodora 77:159.
Taberlet, P., L. Gielly, G. Pautou, andJ. Bouvet. 1991. Universal primers for amplification of three non-coding regions of chloroplast DNA.Plant Molecular Biology 17:1105–1109.
Templeton, A. R., K. A. Crandall, andC. F. Sing. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonucleases mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation.Genetics 132:619–633.
Zeidler, A., S. Schneider, C. Jung, A. E. Melchinger, andP. Dittrich. 1994. The use of DNA fingerprinting in ecological studies ofPhragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steudel.Botanica Acta 107:237–242.
Sources of Unpublished Materials
Eggers, S. Personal Communication. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 190 5th Street East, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101-1638.
Hauber, D. Personal Communication. Department of Biological Sciences, Box 27, Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. Invaders Database System. http://invader.dbs.umt.edu/scripts/esrimap.dll?name =Noxious_map&Plant_Name=Phragmites+australis&submitl =Submit&Choice=1&CMD=Map.
Yuma Park Service Ranger. Personal Communication. Yuma Crossing National Heritage Area, 180 West First Street, Yuma, Arizon 85364.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saltonstall, K. Genetic variation among North American populations ofPhragmites australis: Implications for management. Estuaries 26, 444–451 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823721
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823721