Summary
In recent years attempts have been made to supplement traditional breeding for the production of salt-tolerant plants with variability existing in cell culture. The potential causes suggested as an explanation for the limited success of the in vitro approach include: a) lack, or loss during selection, of regeneration capability; b) the development of epigenetically adapted cells; c) lack of correlation between the mechanisms of tolerance operating in cultured cells and mechanisms that operate in cells in the intact plant; and d) multigenicity of salt tolerance. The recent successful production of healthy, fertile, and genetically stable salt-tolerant regenerants from cells obtained from highly morphogenic explants which are selected early in culture (using one-step or short-term strategies) for salt tolerance, together with the demonstration that salt-sensitive plants can become tolerant by mutations in one or few genes, suggest that some of the potential limitations can be overcome and that some of them may not exist at all.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abel, G. H. Inheritance of the capacity for chloride inclusion and exclusion by soybean. Crop. Sci. 9:697–698; 1969.
Alldridge, N. A. Anomalous vessel elements in wilty dwarf tomato. Bot. Gaz. 125:138–142; 1964.
Amzallag, G. N.; Lerner, H. R.; Poljakoff-Mayber, A. Induction of increased salt tolerance inSorghum bicolor by NaCl pretreatment. J. Exp. Bot. 71:29–34; 1990.
Ball, S. G. Molecular basis of somaclonal variation. In: Bajaj, Y. P. S., ed. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 11. Somaclonal variation in crop improvements. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990: 134–152.
Blum, A. Plant breeding for stress environments. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1988.
Bressan, R. A.; Singh, N. K.; Handa, A. K., et al. Stable and unstable tolerance to NaCl in cultured tobacco cells. In: Freeling, M., ed. Plant genetics: proceedings of the third annual ARCO plant cell research institute—UCLA symposium on plant biology. New York: A. R. Liss; 1985;755–769.
Chandler, S. F.; Thorpe, T. A. Variation from plant tissue cultures: biotechnological application to improving salinity tolerance. Biotechnol. Adv. 4:117–135; 1986.
Chandler, S. F.; Vasil, I. K. Selection and characterization of NaCl tolerant cells from embryogenic cultures ofPennisetam purpureum Schum. (Napir grass). Plant Sci. Lett. 37:157–164; 1984.
Cheeseman, J. M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. 87:547–550; 1988.
Collin, H. A.; Dix, P. J. Culture systems and selection procedures. In: Dix, P. J., ed. Plant cell line selection procedures and applications. New York: VCH Weinheim; 1990:3–18.
Cushman, J. C.; DeRocher, E. J.; Bohnert, H. J. Gene expression during adaptation to salt stress. In: Katterman, F. R., ed. Environmental injury to plants. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990: 173–203.
Dix, P. J. The role of mutant cell lines in studies on environmental stress tolerance: an assessment. Plant J. 3:309–313; 1993.
Dracup, M. Increasing salt tolerance of plants through cell culture requires greater understanding of tolerance mechanisms. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18:1–15; 1991.
Epstein, E.; Rains, D. W. Advances in salt tolerance. Plant Soil 99:17–29; 1987.
Flowers, T. J.; Lachno, D. R.; Flowers, S. A., et al. Some effects of sodium chloride on cells of rice culturedin vitro. Plant Sci. Lett. 39:205–211; 1985.
Forster, B. P. Genetic engineering for stress tolerance in theTriticeae. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 99B:89–106; 1992.
Forster, B. P.; Phillips, M. S.; Miller, T. E., et al. Chromosome location of genes controlling tolerance to salt (NaCl) and vigour inHordeum vulgare andH. chilense. Heredity 65:99–107; 1990.
Forster, B. P.; Pakniyat, H.; Macaulay, W., et al. Variation in the leaf sodium content of theHordeum vulgare (barley) cultivar Maythorpe and its derived mutant cv. Golden Promise. Heredity 73:249–253; 1994.
Freytag, A. M.; Wrather, J. A.; Erichsen, A. W. Salt tolerance sugarbeet progeny from tissue cultures challenged with multiple salts. Plant Cell Rep. 8:647–650; 1990.
Futuyma, D. J. Evolutionary biology, 2nd ed. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers; 1986.
Galiba, G.; Simon-Sarkadi, L.; Kocsy, G., et al. Possible chromosomal location of genes determining the osmoregulation of wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 85:415–418; 1992.
Gulati, A.; Jaiwal, P. K. Selection and characterization of mannitol-tolerant callus lines ofVigna radiata (L.) Wilczak. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 34:35–41; 1993.
Hagemann, M.; Zuther, E. Selection and characterization of mutants ofCyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 unable to tolerate high salt concentrations. Arch. Microbiol. 158:429–434; 1992.
Hasegawa, P. M.; Binzel, M. L.; Reuveni, M., et al. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of ion accumulations and compartmentations contributing to salt adaptation of plant cells. In: Bennett, A. B.; O'Neill, S. D., eds. Horticultural biotechnology. New York: Wiley-Liss; 1990:295–304.
Hickok, L. G.; Vogelien, D. L.; Varne, T. R. Selection of a mutation conferring high NaCl tolerance to gametophytes of Ceratopteris. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81:293–300; 1991.
Hoffmann, A. A.; Parsons, P. A. Evolutionary genetics and environmental stress. Oxford, England: Oxford Science Publications; 1991.
Hurkman, W. J. Effect of salt stress on plant gene expression: a review. Plant Soil 46:145–151; 1992.
Ibrahim, K. M.; Collins, J. C.; Collin, H. A. Characterization of progeny ofColeus blumei following anin vitro selection for salt tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 28:139–145; 1992.
Jia, Z. P.; McCullough, N.; Martel, R., et al. Gene amplification at a locus encoding a putative Na+/H+ antiporter confers sodium and lithium tolerance in fission yeast. EMBO J. 11:1631–1640; 1992.
Jain, R. K.; Jain, S.; Nainawatee, H. S., et al. Salt-tolerance inBrassica juncea L. I.In vitro selection, agronomic evaluation and genetic stability. Euphytica 48:141–152; 1990.
Kirti, P. B.; Hadi, S.; Kumar, P. A., et al. Production of sodium-chloride-tolerantBrassica juncea plants byin vitro selection at the somatic embryo level. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:233–237; 1991.
Koornneef, M.; Jorna, M. L.; Brinkhorst-van der Swan, D. L. C., et al. The isolation of abscisic acid (ABA) deficient mutants by selection of induced revertants in non-germinating gibberelin sensitive lines ofArabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heyah. Theor. Appl. Genet. 61: 385–393; 1982.
Kueh, J. S. H.; Bright, S. W. J. Biochemical and genetical analyses of three proline-accumulating barley mutants. Plant Sci. Lett. 27: 233–241; 1982.
Langridge, J. An osmotic mutant ofArabidopsis thaliana. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 11:457–470; 1958.
Lebrun, L.; Rajasekaran, K.; Mullins, M. G. Selectionin vitro for NaCl-tolerance inVitis rupestris Scheele. Ann. Bot. 56:733–739; 1985.
Lehle, F. R.; Kahn, R. A.Arabidopsis mutant with enhanced NaCl tolerance. In: Schweizer, D.; Peuker, K.; Loidl, J., eds. Fourth Intern. Conf.Arabidopsis Research, Inst. Cytology and Genetics, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1990. [Published by the meeting organizers.]
Lu, D. B.; Scars, R. G.; Paulsen, G. M. Increasing stress resistance byin vitro selection for abscisic acid insensitivity in wheat. Crop. Sci. 29:939–943; 1989.
Macnair, M. R.; Cumbs, Q. J.; Meharg, A. A. The genetics of arsenate tolerance in Yorkshire fog,Holcus lanatus L. Heredity 69:325–335; 1992.
Mahon, J. D. Limitations to the use of physiological variability in plant breeding. Can. J. Plant Sci. 63:11–21; 1983.
McCue, K. F.; Hanson, A. D. Drought and salt tolerance: towards understanding and application. Trends Biotech. 8:358–362; 1990.
McHugen, A.; Swartz, M. A tissue culture derived salt-tolerant line of flax (Linum usitatissimum). J. Plant Physiol. 117:109–117; 1984.
McNeilly, T. Selection and breeding for salinity tolerance in cross species. A case for optimism? Acta Oecol. 11:595–610; 1990.
Meredith, C. P. Selecting better crops from cultured cells. In: Gustafson, J. P., ed. Gene manipulation in plant improvement. 16th Stadler Genetics Symposium. New York: Plenum Press; 1984:503–528.
Morgan, J. M. A gene controlling differences in osmoregulation in wheat. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18:249–257; 1991.
Nabors, M. W. Increasing salt and drought tolerance of crop plants. In: Randall, D. D.; Blevins, D. B.; Larson, R. L., et al. eds. Current topics in plant biochemistry and physiology, vol. 2. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri; 1983:167–186.
Nabors, M. W. Environmental stress resistance. In: Dix, P. J., ed. Plant cell line selection procedures and applications. New York: VCH Weinheim; 1990:167–186.
Noble, C. L.; Rogers, M. E. Arguments for the use of physiological criteria for improving the salt tolerance in crops. Plant Soil 146:99–107; 1992.
Norlyn, J. D.; Epstein, E. Variability in salt tolerance of four Triticale lines at germination and emergence. Crop. Sci. 24:1090–1092; 1984.
O'Connor, B. J.; Robertson, A. J.; Gusta, L. V. Differential stress tolerance and cross adaptation in a somaclonal variant of flax. J. Plant Physiol. 139:32–36; 1991.
Oertli, J. J. Extracellular salt accumulation, a possible mechanism of salt injury in plants. Agrochemica 12:461–469; 1968.
Parry, A. D.; Blonstein, A. D.; Babiano, M. J., et al. Abscisic-acid metabolism in a wilty mutant ofNicotiana plumbaginifolia. Planta 183:237–243; 1991.
Postlethwait, S. N.; Nelson, O. E. A chemically wilted mutant of maize. Am. J. Bot. 44:628–633; 1957.
Quarrie, S. A. Droopy: a wilty mutant of potato deficient in abscisic acid. Plant Cell Environ. 5:23–26; 1982.
Rains, D. W.; Croughan, S. S.; Croughan, T. P. Isolation and characterization of mutant cell lines and plants: salt tolerance. In: Vasil, I. K., ed. Cell culture and somatic cell genetics of plants, vol. 3. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1986:537–547.
Rathinasabapathi, B.; Gage, D. A.; Mackill, D. J., et al. Cultivated and wild species do not accumulate glycinebitaine due to defficiencies in two biosynthetic steps. Crop. Sci. 33:534–538; 1993.
Saleki, R.; Young, P. G.; Lefebvre, D. D. Mutants ofArabidopsis thaliana capable of germination under saline conditions. Plant Physiol. 101:839–845; 1993.
Saranga, Y.; Cahaner, A.; Zamir, D., et al. Breeding tomatoes for salt tolerance: inheritance of salt tolerance and related traits in interspecific population. Theor Appl. Genet. 84:390–396; 1992.
Scandalios, I. G., ed. Genomic responses to environmental stress: advances in genetics, vol. 28. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1990.
Shannon, M. C. Principles and strategies in breeding for high salt tolerance. Plant Soil 89:227–241; 1985.
Spiker, S. Plant chromatin structure. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36:235–253; 1985.
Sumaryati, S.; Negrutin, I.; Jacobs, M. Characterization and regeneration of salt- and water-stress mutants from protoplast culture ofNicotiana plumbaginifolia (Viviani). Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:613–619; 1992.
Sutka, J.; Snape, J. W. Location of a gene for frost resistance on chromosome 5A of wheat. Euphytica 42:41–44; 1989.
Sykes, S. R. The inheritance of salt exclusion in woody perennial fruit species. Plant Soil 146:123–129; 1992.
Taeb, M.; Koebner, R. M. D.; Forster, B. P., et al. Association between genes controlling flowering time and shoot sodium accumulation in theTriticeae. Plant Soil 146:117–121; 1992.
Tal, M. Physiological genetics of salt resistance in higher plants: studies on the level of the whole plant and isolated organs, tissues and cells. In: Staples, R. C.; Toenniessen, G. H., eds. Salinity tolerance on plants. Strategies for crop improvement. New York: Wiley & Sons; 1984:301–320.
Tal, M. Genetics of salt tolerance in higher plants: theoretical and practical considerations. Plant Soil 89:199–226; 1985.
Tal, M. Somaclonal variation for salt resistance. In: Bajaj, Y. P. S., ed. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 11. Somaclonal variation in crop improvement. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990: 236–257.
Tal, M.In vitro methodology for increasing salt tolerance in crop plants. Acta Hortic. 336:69–79; 1993.
Tal, M.; Benzioni, A. Ion imbalance inCapsicum annuum, Scabrous diminutive, a wilty mutant of pepper. I. Sodium fluxes. J. Exp. Bot. 28:1337–2341; 1977.
Tal, M.; Nevo, Y. Abnormal stomatal behavior and root resistance, and hormonal imbalance in three wilty mutants of tomato. Biochem. Genet. 8:291–300; 1973.
Tal, M.; Witztum, A.; Shifriess, C. Abnormal stomatal behavior and leaf anatomy inCapsicum annuum, scabrous diminutive, a wilty mutant of pepper. Ann. Bot. 38:983–988; 1974.
Tal, M.; Eshel, A.; Witztum, A. Abnormal stomatal behaviour and ion imbalance inCapsicum scabrous diminutive. J. Exp. Bot. 27:953–960; 1976.
Tarczynski, M. C.; Jensen, R. G.; Bohnert, H. J. Stress protection of transgenic tobacco by production of the osmolyte, mannitol. Science 259:508–510; 1993.
Vajrabhaya, M.; Thanapaisai, T.; Vajrabhaya, T. Development of salt tolerant lines of KDML and LPT rice cultivars through tissue culture. Plant Cell Rep. 8:411–414; 1989.
Walker-Simmons, M.; Kudrna, D. A.; Warner, R. L. Reduced accumulation of ABA during water stress in a molybdenum cofactor mutant of barley. Plant Physiol. 90:728–733; 1989.
Wang, T. L.; Donkin, M. E.; Martin, E. S. The physiology of a wilty pea: abscisic acid production under water stress. J. Exp. Bot 35:1222–1232; 1984.
Winicov, I. Characterization of salt tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) plants regenerated from salt tolerant cell lines. Plant Cell Rep. 10:561–564; 1991.
Winicov, I. Gene expression in relation to salt tolerance. In: Basra, A. S., ed. Stress-induced gene expression in plants. Harwood: Academic Publishers; 1993:61–85.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tal, M. In vitro selection for salt tolerance in crop plants: Theoretical and practical considerations. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.–Plant 30, 175–180 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823028
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823028