Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of the integrated package of nutrition and health services

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preschool children in 0–36 months of age are nutritionally the most vulnerable group. Nutrition and health services delivery through an ICDS programme aims at ameliorating the problems of malnutrition and infection. The extent of utilization of nutrition and health services in relation to nutritional status can provide valuable information on operational efficacy of the programme. In the present study, 610 preschool children (0–36 months) under an urban ICDS block were placed in three categories of service utilization viz. full, partial and none. The impact of the extent of service utilisation on nutritional status and morbidity was assessed over a one year period. The findings showed that complete utilization of all services resulted in significant improvement in nutritional status as assessed through anthropometric indices viz. height/age, weight/age and weight/height as percent NCHS median standard. Data on morbidity in children showed that the number of episodes and the duration of illness(es) were significantly lower when the services were utilized fully than when utilized partially or not utilized at all. Thus major efforts should go into the convergence of services and full utilization by the community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Administrative Committee on Co-ordination subcommittee on Nutrition Malnutrition and infection: A Review. WHO, Geneva 1989.

  2. Bhaskaran P. The vicious cycle of malnutrition infection with effect of growth retardation in early life on immunocompetence in later life.Indian J Med Res 1980; 72: 519–529.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tandon BN, Ramchandran K, Bhatnagar S. Integrated Child Development Services in India: Objectives, organisation and baseline survey of the project evaluation.Indian J Med Res 1981; 73: 374–378.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reddy V. Malnutrition and immune response.Indian Nutr Diets 1990; 16: 165–168.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chandra RK. Interactions of nutrition, infection and immune response.Acta Pediatr Scand 1979; 68: 137–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gopaldas T. USAID Assisted ICDS impact evaluation project in Panchmahals (Gujarat) and Chandrapur (Maharashtra) Final Report. Dept. of Foods and Nutrition, Faculty of Home Science, M.S. University of Baroda, Baroda, 1991: 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  7. National Institute of Public Co-operation and Child Development. National Evaluation of Integrated Child Development Services. NIPCCD, New Delhi, 1992: 62–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saiyed, F., Seshadri, S. Impact of the integrated package of nutrition and health services. Indian J Pediatr 67, 322–328 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820677

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02820677

Key words

Navigation