Skip to main content
Log in

Personality differences between women police recruits, their male counterparts, and the general female population

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presently police manager and their recruiting staff are using an increasing number of screening tools including psychological testing during the hiring processes. Prior research suggests that gender is often ignored in the review of testing results. This could lead to problems in the interpretation of results. This research investigates the existence, if any, in the pre-socialization personality differences between male and female police recruits as well as between female police recruits and the general population of females. Subjects (N=104) were from a multi-agency training facility in a southern state. Subjects completed the MMPI-2 at the beginning of their police academy training to control for any socialization effects the training may have. The diagnostic clinical scales, the content scales, and the gender scales of the MMPI-2 were subjected to independent discriminant function analyses to determine if differences between male and female recruits exist. Scale 5 (Mf), GM, and GF were analyzed via t-tests to determine if differences between the female recruits and women in the normative sample exist. All discriminant functions were significant at the .05 level. Scales that differentiated male and female recruits were: Ma (Scale 9), ASP, FRS, BIZ, Mf (Scale, 5), and GF. Female recruits differed from the female normative sample on only GF (recruits were lower). It is suggested that future research focus on the predictive power of the content scales for continuation in the police field. It is also suggested that future research investigate the flexibility of the gender constructs throughout the policing career.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Austin, J.T. (1994). “Test review: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI-2)”Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling Development, 27, 179–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., & Shelley, J.K. (1992). The new lone ranger: Policewomen on patrol.American Journal of Police, 12(2), 47–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D.J. (1982) Policewomen: Myths, and reality.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 10 (1), 112–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B.L. & Budnick, K.J. (1986) Defeminization of women in law enforcement: A new twist on the traditional police personality.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 14(4), 314–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J.N., & Graham J.R. (1994) The MMPI-2: A new standard for personality assessment and research in counseling settings.Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 27, 131–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, B.N., & Raza, S.M. (1987). Personality Characteristics of Police Applicants.: Comparisons Across Subgroups and with Other Populations.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 15, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, W.O., Prien E.P., & Bernard, J.L. (1990). Psychological screening of law enforcement officers: A case for job relatedness.Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 176–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, S.R., & McKinley, J.C. (Ed.) (1989).MMPI-2 Manual for Administration and Scoring. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • House, C.H. (1993). The changing role of women in law enforcement.The Police Chief, 60(10), 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuell, L.L., Retzlaff, P., & Sheehan, E. (1993). Policewomen personality.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 8(1), 149–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S.E., & Junik, N.C. (1996).Doing Justice, Doing Gender: Women in Law and Criminal Justice Occupations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C.D., & Dahlstrom W.G. (1992) The derivation of, Gender-Role Scales GM and GF for the MMPI-2 and their relationship to scale 5 (Mf).Journal of Personality Assessment, 59(3), 486–499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, D.M. (1993). From policewoman to police officen: An unfinished revolution.Police Studies, 16(3), 90–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (1989).Using Multivariate Statistics (2nd ed.). New York. HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talley, J.E., & Hinz, L.D. (1990).Performance Prediction of Public Safety and Law Enforcement Personnel: A study in Race and Gender Differences and MMPI Subscales. Charles C. Thomas: Springfield, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, C.A. (1989). Psychology tests, suits, and minority applicants.Police Journal, 62, 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Author Notes: Send all enquires to Larry A. Gould, Ph.D., Dept. of Criminal Justice, Northern Arizona Univerity, Box 15005, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5005.

1. A special thank you is given to Northern Arizona University for providing the funding of the parent project from which this research was accomplished. I also wish to extend my gratitude to those whose time and effort went into the collection and computer entry of the data—Dr. Larry Gould and Rachel Rowland. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Clay Moore for the statistical “chats”.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gould, L.A., Volbrecht, M. Personality differences between women police recruits, their male counterparts, and the general female population. J Police Crim Psych 14, 1–18 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813858

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813858

Keywords

Navigation