Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: Are American, British, and Canadian workers all that different?

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examine demand for union membership amongst young and adult workers in Britain, Canada, and the United States. Using a model of representation advanced by Farber (1983, 2001) and Riddell (1993), we find that a majority of the union density differential between young and adult workers in all three countries is due to supply-side constraints rather than a lower desire for unionization by the young. This finding lends credence to two conjectures: first, tastes for collective representation do not differ substantially among workers (either by nationality or by age) and second, union representation can be fruitfully modeled as an experience-good. The experience-good properties of union membership explain the persistence of union density differentials (in this case between youth and adults) in the face of equal levels of desired representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Booth, Alison. “The Free Rider Problem and a Social Custom Model of Trade Union Membership.”Quarterly Journal of Economics 100 (February 1985). 253–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, Kate. “The Role of Union Strategies in NLRB Certification Elections.”Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50 (January 1997): 195–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, William and Richard Freeman. “Liking the Workplace You Have: The Incumbency Effect in Preferences Towards Unions.” Working Paper No. 1115, Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics, 2001.

  • Farber, Henry. “The Determination of the Union Status of Workers.”Econometrica 51 (1983): 1417–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. “Notes on the Economics of Labor Unions.” Working Paper No. 452, Industrial Relations Section, Princeton University, 2001.

  • — and Alan Krueger. “Union Membership in the United States: The Decline Continues.” In Bruce Kaufman and Morris Kleiner, eds.Employee Representation: Alternatives and Future Directions. Madison, Wisc: IRRA, 1993, pp. 70–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Rafael and Morley Gunderson. “The Experience-Good Model of Union Membership.” In Phanindra V. Wunnava, ed.The Changing Role of Unions. New York: M.E. Sharpe 2004, pp. 92–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, Rafael, Morley Gunderson, and Noah Meltz. “Comparing Youth and Adult Desire for Unionization in Canada.”British Journal of Industrial Relations 40 (September 2002): 521–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greer, David.Industrial Organization and Public Policy, 3rd ed. London: MacMillan, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotier, Philip.Marketing Management/ International Edition. London: Prentice Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin and Noah Meltz. “Canadian and American Attitudes Toward Work and Institutions.”Perspectives on Work 1 (No. 3, 1997): 14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. “Consumer Behavior, Retailer Power and Market Performance in Consumer Goods Industries.”Review of Economics and Statistics 56 (Novermber 1974): 419–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, W. Craig. “Unionization in Canada and the United States: A Tale of Two Countries.” In David Card and Richard Freeman, eds.Small Differences That Matter: Labor Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: 1993, pp. 109–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George and Gary Becker. “De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum.”American Economic Review 67 (March 1997): 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Policy Studies Institute, NW1 3SR, London, UK

    Alex Bryson

  2. London School of Economics, WC2A 2AE, London, UK

    Rafael Gomez

  3. University of Toronto, M5S 2E8, ONT, Canada

    Morley Gunderson & Noah Meltz

Authors
  1. Alex Bryson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rafael Gomez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Morley Gunderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noah Meltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper appeared as Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) discussion paper dp515, January 2002. This paper was produced under the “Future of Trade Unions in Modern Britain” program supported by the Leverhulme Trust and with the financial help of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) of Canada. We thank Jo Blanden, Andy Charlwood, David Metcalf, and Steve Machin for comments on an earlier draft. We dedicate this paper to our mentor and friend, the late Noah Meltz, who passed away as this paper was being written.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bryson, A., Gomez, R., Gunderson, M. et al. Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: Are American, British, and Canadian workers all that different?. J Labor Res 26, 155–167 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812227

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02812227

Keywords

Search

Navigation