Abstract
One of the primary facets of the sociology of law is concerned with the relationships between formal rules and regulations having the force of governmental social control and the values, norms and practices of those who enforce them (or not). This “law in action” perspective enables research to test out the differential impact on legal decisions of both formal and informal aspects of social control (Hawkins, 1992). One of the limitations of recent work on domestic violence is that it focuses too narrowly on one or two negative sanctions, e.g., arrest or restraining orders, to the exclusion of the other options and the mix of formal and informal decisions in the criminal justice system as a whole (Reiss, 1974). This research attempts through a close analysis of the workings of the Quincy, Massachusetts criminal justice system in response to domestic violence, to identify the consequences, unanticipated and anticipated, of decisions made in several domains (public, police, prosecutors, and courts) of the criminal justice system. This study uses in-depth interviews with batterers, victims and criminal justice agency and related personnel as well as agency policies, training materials and records to examine possible unintended consequences of aggressive intervention in cases of domestic violence. This study will explore the impact of the Quincy Domestic Violence Program, considered to be a national model, on the lives of victims and offenders who are treated by the court. We have selected the District Court at Quincy, Massachusetts as our research site. It has a well deserved national reputation treating abusers systematically from the initial intake by arresting officers through close supervision in probation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bachman, R. and Coker, A.L. (1995). Police involvement in domestic violence: The interactive effects of victim injury, offenders's history of violence, and race.Violence and Victims 10(2): 91106.
Bayley, D.H. (1986). The tactical choices of police patrol officers.Journal of Criminal Justice, 14, 329–348.
Berk, S.F., Campbell, A., Klap, R. & Western, B. (1992). Beyesian analysis of the Colorado Springs spouse assault experiment.Criminal Law and Criminology, 83, 170–200.
Bowman, C. (1992). The arrest experiments: A feminist critique.Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(1), 201–208.
Buzawa, E. (1979). Legislative responses to the problem of domestic violence in Michigan. Wayne LawReview 25 (3), 859–881.
Buzawa, E. (1988).Explaining variations in police response to domestic violence: A case study in Detroit and New England. In G. Hotaling, D. Finkelhor, J. Kirkpatrick & M. A. Straus (Eds.),Coping with family violence: Research and policy perspectives (pp. 169–182). Newbury Park, Ca. Sage Publications.
Buzawa, E. & Buzawa, C. (1990).Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Buzawa, E. & Buzawa, C. (1996).Domestic Violence: The Criminal Justice Response. 2nd Edition. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Buzawa, E. & Austin, T. (1993). Determining police response to domestic violence victims.American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 610–623.
Crowell, N.A. & Burgess, A.W. (Eds.)Understanding Violence Against Women. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Dunford, F.W., Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. (1989).The Omaha domestic violence police experiment: Final report to the National Institute of Justice and the City of Omaha. Boulder, Co.: Institute of Behavioral Science.
Dutton, D.G. (1986). Wife assaulters' explanations for assault: The neutralization of self punishment.Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(4), 381–390.
Elliott, D.S. (1989).Criminal justice procedures in family violence crimes. In L. Ohlin & M. Tonry (Eds.),Crime and justice: A review of research (pp. 427–480). London: University of Chicago Press.
Fireston, D. (1995, April 5). Giuliani and Council Class on Dormestic Violence Effort. NYT, p. 83.
Ford, D. (1983). Wife battery and criminal justice: A study of victim decision-making.Family Relations, 32, 463–475.
Hart, B. (1992).State codes on domestic violence: Analysis, commentary and recommendations. Reno, NV: National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges.
Hart, B. (1995, March 31). Coordinated community approaches to domestic violence. Paper presented at the Strategic Planning Workshop on Violence Against Women, National Institute of Justice, Washington, DC Reading, Pa.:” Battered Women's Justice Project, Pennsylvania Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
Hirschel, J.D., Hutchison, I.W., Dean, C.W., Kelley, J.J., & Pesackis, C.E. (1991).Charlotte spouse assault replication project: Final report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Langan, P. & Innes, C. (1986).Preventing domestic violence against women. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Langley, R. & Levy, R. (1977).Wife beating: The silent crisis. New York: Dutton.
Lanza-Kaduce, L., Greenleaf, R. & Donahue, M. (1995). Trickle up report writing: The impact of a pro-arrest policy for domestic disturbances.Justice Quarterly, (12)3, 525–542.
Loving, N. (1980)Responding to spouse abuse and wife beating: A guide for police. Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.
Manning, P. (1988).Symbolic interaction: Signifying calls and police response. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.
Mastrofski, S. (1995, March). Comments made in a Workshop on Community Policing at the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences meeting.
Pate, A. & Hamilton, E. (1992). Formal and informal deterrents to domestic violence: The Dade County Spouse Assault Experiment.American Sociological Review, 57, 691–697.
Pierce, G., Spaar, S. & Briggs, G. (1988, November).Character of calls for police work. NIJ Report. Washington, DC: Department of Justice.
Sanders, D. (1988). Personal violence and public order: The prosecution of ‘domestic’ violence in England and Wales.International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 16, 359–382.
Sheptycki, J.W.E. (1993).Innovations in policing domestic violence. Newcastle upon Tyne: Athanaeum.
Sherman, L. (1992). The influence of criminology on criminal law: Evaluating for misdemeanor domestic violence.Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 85(1), 901–945.
Stanko, E.A. (1989).Missing the mark? Police battering. In J. Hanmer, J. Radford, & B. Stanko (Eds.),Women, policing and male violence (pp. 46–49). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Straus, M.A. & Gelles, R.G. (1990).How violent are American families? Estimates from the National Family Violence Resurvey and other studies. M.A. Straus and R.J. Gelles (Eds.).Physical Violence in American Families: Risk Factors and Adaptations to Violence in 8, 145 Families (pp. 49–73). New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.
Urban Institute (1996, March 29).The VAWA Act of 1994: Evaluation of the STOP Block Grants to combat violence against women. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
Victim Services Agency (1988).The law enforcement response to family violence: A state by state guide to family violence legislation. New York Victim Services Agency.
Zorza, J. (1994). Must we stop arresting batterers? Analysis and policy implications of new police domestic violence studies.New England Law Review, 28, 929–990.
Zorza, J. & Woods, L. (1994).Analysis and policy implications of the new police domestic violence studies. New York: National Center on Women and Family Law.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buzawa, E., Hotaling, G. & Klein, A. What happens when a reform works? The need to study unanticipated consequences of mandatory processing of domestic violence. J Police Crim Psych 13, 43–54 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806712
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806712