Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interviewing survivors of rape

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abarbanel, G., &Richman, G. (1989). “The rape victim.” In H.J. Parad & L.G. Parad (Eds.)Crisis intervention: Theory, techniques, and research. California: Family Service America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abarbanel, G., & Adams, A. (1980). “Rape: The myths, the laws and the facts.”Journal of Emergency Care, 2(1).

  • Abarbanel, G., Adams, A., Orrante, L., Rumelt, E., &West, L. (1982).Taking action. What to do if you are raped. California: Rape Treatment Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.L., & Geiselman, R.E. (in press). “Eyewitness testimony of mentally retarded: Effects of the cognitive interview.”Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, in press.

  • Burgess, A.W., &Holmstrom, L.L. (1979)Rape: Crisis and recovery. Maryland: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dywan, J., &Bowers, K.S. (1983). “The use of hypnosis to enhance recall.”Science, 222, 184–185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., &Amador M. (1987). “Field test of the cognitive interview: Enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime”Journal of Applied Psychology 74, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Mackinnon, D.P., &Holland, H.L. (1985). “Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.”Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., &Padilla, J. (1988). “Cognitive interviewing with child witnesses.”Journal of Police Science and Administration 16, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geislman, R.E., Saywitz, K.J., &Bornstein, G.K. (1990).Cognitive questioning techniques for child victims and witnesses of crime. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girelli, S.A., Resick, P.A., Marhoefer-Dvorak, S., &Hutter, C.K. (1986). “Subjective distress and violence during rape: Their effects on long-term fear.”Victims and Violence, 1, 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrington, L.H. (1985). “Victims of crime: Their plight, our response.”American Psychologist, 40, 99–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, E.F. (1979).Eyewitness testimony. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCahill, T.W., Meyer, L.C., &Fischman, A.M. (1979).The aftermath of rape. Massachusetts: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rand Corporation. (1975, October).The criminal investigation process (Vol. 1–3). Rand Corporation Technical Report R-1776-DOJ, Santa Monica, CA.

  • Reiser, M., &Nielsen, M. (1980). “Investigative hypnosis A developing specialty.”American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 23, 75–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, G.S., &Simmons, W.L. (1983). “Use of hypnosis to enhance eyewitness accuracy: Does it work?”Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 70–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Los Angeles

    Mara G. Latts & R. Edward Geiselman

Authors
  1. Mara G. Latts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Edward Geiselman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latts, M.G., Geiselman, R.E. Interviewing survivors of rape. JPCP 7, 8–17 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806601

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02806601

Keywords

Search

Navigation