Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A phylogeny inferred from large ribosomal subunit (26S) rDNA sequences suggests that Cuscuta is a derived member of Convolvulaceae

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cuscuta is a parasitic angiosperm that has been considered alternatively either as a genus within Convolvulaceae or as a monogeneric family in its own right. Although typically placed in the Solanales,Cuscuta has also been positioned within the Polemoniales. Extreme reduction of morphological and anatomical characters, as well as chloroplast genome reductions and rearrangements, has made the phylogenetic placement ofCuscuta uncertain. Analysis of 26S rDNA sequences suggests thatCuscuta is a derived member of Convolvulaceae. Molecular results are discussed in relation to the morphological and anatomical characters of autotrophic members of Convolvulaceae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Britton N. L. &H. C. Brown. 1913. An illustrated flora of the northern United States and Canada, and the British possessions. Ed. 2. Scribner, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bömmer, D., G. Haberhausen &K. Zetsche. 1993. A large deletion in the plastid DNA of the holoparasitic flowering plantCuscuta reflexa concerning two ribosomal proteins, (rpl2, rpl23), one transfer RNA (trnI) and an ORF 2280 homologue. Curr. Genet. 24: 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Choisy, J. D.. 1841. De Convolvulaceis Dissertatio, etc. Mém. Soc. Phys. et d’Hist. Nat. Genève 9: 261–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colewell, A. E. L.. 1994. Genome evolution in a nonphotosynthetic plant. Ph.D. dissertation. Washington University, St. Louis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A.. 1968., The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Ed. 2. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullings, K. W. &T. D. Bruns. 1992. Phylogenetic origin of the Monotropoideae inferred from partial 28S ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Canad. J. Bot. 70: 1703–1708.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, A. M. T.. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, G. D.. 1989. The last Dahlgrenogram. System of classification of the dicotyledons. Pages 249–260.In: K. Tan, editor. The Davis and Hedge Festschrift. University Press. Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • dePamphilis, C. W.. 1995. Genes and genomes. Pages 177–205.In: M. C. Press & J. D. Graves, editors. Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Moulins, C. 1853. Etudes organiques sur les Cuscutes. Compt-Rend. de la XIX session (Toulouse) du Congrès Scientifique de France 2: 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, J. D. &G. B. Lawes. 1974. Plastid ultrastructure in some parasitic and semi-parasitic plants. Cytobiologie 9: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie, S. R. &J. D. Palmer. 1992. Restriction site mapping of the chloroplast inverted repeat: a molecular phylogeny of the Asteridae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. J. &J. L. Doyle. 1987. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem. Bull. 19: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelmann, G.. 1887. The botanical works of the late George Engelmann. Wilson, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27: 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freyer, R., K. Neckerman, R. M. Maier &H. Kössel. 1995. Structural and functional analysis of plastid genomes from parasitic plants: loss of an intron within the genusCuscuta. Curr. Genet. 27: 580–586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, A. 1908. New manual of botany. Ed. 7. American Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberhausen, G. K. Valentin &K. Zetsche. 1992. Organization and sequence of photosynthetic genes from the plastid genome of the holoparasitic flowering plantCuscuta reflexa Molec. Gen. Genet. 232: 154–161.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • — &K. Zetsche. 1994. Functional loss of allndh genes in an otherwise relatively unaltered plastid genome of the holoparasitic flowering plantCuscuta reflexa. Pl. Molec. Biol. 24: 217–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbett, D. S. &R. Vilgalys. 1993. Phylogenetic relationships ofLentinus (Basidiomycotina) inferred from molecular and morphological characters. Syst. Bot. 18: 409–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J. D., 1885. The flora of British India. L. Reeve. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1959. The families of flowering plants. Vol. I. Dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johri, M. &B. Tiagi. 1952. Floral morphology and seed formation inCuscuta reflexa Roxb. Phytomorphology 2: 162–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, T. M. Kiss &F. Solmosy. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of a 25S rRNA gene from tomato. Nucl. Acids Res. 17: 796.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuijt, J.. 1969. The biology of parasitic flowering plants. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzoff, R. K. J. A. Sweere, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis &E. A. Zimmer. 1998. The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants. Molec. Biol. Evol. 15: 251–263.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. H. M.. 1951. Taxonomy of vascular plants. Maemillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado, M. A. &K. Zetsche. 1990. A structural, functional and molecular analysis of plastids of the holoparasitesCuscuta reflexa andCuscuta europea. Planta 181: 91–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, W. P. &D. R. Maddison. 1992. Mac-Clade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Version 3.0. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, C. R. &L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of the Dicotyledons. Vol. II. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, H. J. K. M. Scott, R. G. Olmstead, T., Szaro, R. K. Jansen &J. D. Palmer. 1993. Interfamilial relationships of the Asteraceae: insights fromrbcL sequence variation. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 742–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molau, U.. 1995. Reproductive ecology and biology. Pages. 141–176.In: M. C. Press & J. D. Graves, editors. Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, K. B. &F. A. Faloona. 1987. Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via polymerase chain reaction. Meth. Enzymol. 155: 335–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nickrent, D. L. &C. R. Franchina. 1990. Phylogenetic relationships of the Santalales and relatives. J. Molec. Evol. 31: 294–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. High rates of nucleotide substitution in nuclear small-subunit (18S) rDNA from holoparasitic flowering plants. J. Molec. Evol. 39: 62–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996 Molecular studies of parasitic plants using ribosomal RNA. Pages 28–52.In: M. T. Moreno et al. editors. Advances in plant research, Junta de Andalucia. Dirección General de Investigación Agraria, Cordoba, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,A. E. Colwell, A. D. Wolfe, N. D. Young, K. E. Steiner &C. dePamphilis. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic and evolutionary studies of parasitic plants. Pages 211–241.In: P. Soltis, D. Soltis & J. Doyle, editors. Molecular systematics of plants. Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmstead, R. G., R. K. Jansen, H. J. Michaels, S. R. Downie &J. D. Palmer. 1990. Chloroplast DNA and phylogenetic studies in the Asteridae. Pages 119–134.In: S. Kawano, editor. Biological approaches and evolutionary trends in plants. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,B. Bremmer, K. M. Scott &J. D. Palmer. 1992a. A parsimony analysis of the Asteridae sensu lato based onrbcL sequences. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 700–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,H. J. Michaels, K. M. Scott &J. D. Palmer. 1992b. Monophyly of the Asteridae and identification of their major lineages inferred from DNA sequences ofrbcL. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Amador, M. C., L. Arreola, J. Márquez-Guzmán &A. García-Argáez. 1996. Taxonomic markers of the family Convolvulaceae in four species ofCuscuta. Int. J. Exp. Bot. 58: 115–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, A. 1897. Convolvulaceae. Pages 1–40.In: A. Engler & K. Prantl, editors Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, IV, Teil 3. Abt. A. W. Engelmann.

  • Pfeiffer, M. 1846. Recherches sur les Cuscutacées. Ann. Sci. Nat. Ser. 3, 5: 83–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Press, M. C., J. D. Graves &G. R. Stewart. 1990. Physiology of the interaction of angiosperm parasites and their higher plant hosts. Pl. Cell Environm. 13: 91–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1995. Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendle, A. B.. 1959. The classification of flowering plants. University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiki, R. K., D. H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S. J. Scharf, R. Huiguchi, G. T. Horn, K. B. Mullis &H. A. Erlich. 1988. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239: 487–491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. J.. 1989. Confidence limits on phylogenies. Cladistics 5: 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy, D. G. 1970. Measurements by DNA hybridization in vitro of the genetic basis of parasitic reduction. Evolution 24: 207–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &A. J. MacInnis. 1970. Measurements by DNA renaturation of the genetic basic of parasitic reduction. Evolution 24: 796–806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, J. K. 1913. Flora of the southeastern United States. Ed. 2. Published by the author. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. F. 1934. A taxonomic and morphological study of the genusCuscuta, dodders, in North Carolina. J Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 50: 283–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soltis, D. F., P. S. Soltis, D. L. Nickrent, L. A. Johnson, W. J. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, J. A. Sweere, R. K. Kuzoff, K. A. Kron, M. W. Chase, S. M. Swenson, E. A. Zimmer, S. Chaw, L. J. Gillespie, W. J. Kress &K. J. Sytsma. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny interred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Ann Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, G. R. &M. C. Press. 1990. The physiology and biochemistry of parasitic angiosperms. Annual Rev. Pl Physiol. Molec. Biol. 41: 127–151.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiura, M., Y. Iida, K. Oono &F. Takaiwa. 1985. The complete nucleotide sequence of rice 25S rRNA gene. Gene 37: 255–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford, D. L.. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &D. P. Beagle. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony. Version 3.1.1. Illinois Natural History Survey. Champaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. L.. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 46: 225–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1993. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F. 1983 Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nordic. J. Bot. 3: 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oostroom, S. J., (assisted by R. D. Hoogland). 1953. Convolvulaceae. Flora Males. Ser. 1, 4: 388–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, L. & M. J. Dallwitz. 1992. The families of flowering plants: descriptions, illustrations, identification and information retrieval. URL: (http:// www.keil.ukans.edu/delta>.

  • Wettstein, R. 1935. Handbuch der systematischen Botanik. Franz Deuticke, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuncker, T. G.. 1921. Revision of the North American species ofCuscuta. Univ. Illinois Biol. Monogr. 6: 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1932 The genusCuscuta. Mem. Torrey Bot. Club 18: 113–331.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Environmental Science, McNeese State University, 70609, Lake Charles, LA, U.S.A.

    Ray Neyland

Authors
  1. Ray Neyland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neyland, R. A phylogeny inferred from large ribosomal subunit (26S) rDNA sequences suggests that Cuscuta is a derived member of Convolvulaceae. Brittonia 53, 108–115 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02805402

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02805402

Key words

Search

Navigation