Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of authority and social influence on eyewitness suggestibility and person recognition

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of an authority figure on eyewitness identification. Participants watched a staged crime and then were administered a photo lineup by either an authority (policeman) or non-authority figure (civilian). Participants in the authority condition were more likely to choose a lineup member than those in the non-authority condition. There was no effect of authority, however, on the accuracy of the identification decisions. The lack of a deleterious effect suggests that the presence of a police officer during identification procedures does not create an unduly suggestive situation or have undesirable effects on eyewitness identification decisions. Although witnesses' choosing behaviors did not increase the rate of identification errors, the effect of the administrator's authority on choosing was reduced when unbiased instructions (vs. biased instructions) were presented to the witnesses. Thus, support was found for the use of neutral instructions during eyewitness identification procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bickman, L. (1974). The social power of a uniform.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigham, J. C., Van Verst, M., & Bothwell, R. K. (1986) Accuracy of children's eyewitness identifications in a field setting.Basic and Applied Social Psychology 7, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B.J. (1988). The effects of apparel on compliance: A field experiment with a fernale authority figure.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14, 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. (1986). Power, powerlessness and empowerment.Religious-Education, 81, 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B. L., & Penrod, S. D. (1995).Mistaken Identifications: The Eyewitness, Psychology and the Law. New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1990). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables.Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luus, C. A., & Wells, G. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects.Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malpass, R. S., & Devine, P. G. (1984). Research on suggestion in lineups and photospreads. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds),Eyewitness Testimony (pp. 64–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1964). Some conditions of obedience and disobedience to authority.Human Relations, 18, 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, C. K., & Sigelman, L. (1976). Authority and conformity: Violation of a traffic regulation.The Journal of Social Psychology, 100, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuille, J. C., & Wells, G. (1991). Concerns about the application of research findings: The issue of ecological validity. In J. L. Doris (Ed.),The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 118–128). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Devenport, J.L., Fisher, R.P. The effect of authority and social influence on eyewitness suggestibility and person recognition. JPCP 11, 35–40 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803685

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803685

Keywords

Navigation