Skip to main content
Log in

Recall of constituent elements from multiple episodes of an event using the cognitive interview

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aschermann, E., Mantwill, M., &Kohnken, G. (1991). “An independent replication of the effectiveness of the cognitive interview.”Applied Cognitive Psychology,5, 489495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G.H. (1967). “A multicomponent theory of the memory trace.” In K. W. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 299–325). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G.H., Gilligan, S.C., &Monteiro, K.P. (1984). “Selectivity of learning caused by affective states.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,110, 451–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M.J. (1981). “The mental retracing of prior activities: Evidence for reminiscence in ordered” (Doctoral Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1981).Dissertation Abstracts International,42, 2108B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firstenberg, I. (1983). “The role of retrieval variability in the interrogation of human memory.” (Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Los Angeles, 1983).Dissertation Abstracts International,44, 1623B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.P. &Geiselman, R.E. (1992).Memory enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield Illinois: Charles Thomas Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.P., Geiselman, R.E., Raymond, D.S., Jurkevich, L.M., &Warhaftig, M.L. (1987). “Enhancing enhanced eyewitness memory: Refining the cognitive interview.”Journal of Police Science and Administration,15, 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flexser, A., &Tulving, E. (1978). “Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.”Psychological Review,85, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., &Callot, R. (1989). “Reverse versus forward recall of script-based texts.”Applied Cognitive Psychology,3, 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., Firstenberg, I., Hutton, L.A., Sullivan, S., Avetissian, I., &Prosk, A. (1984). “Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview.”Journal of Police Science and Administration,12, 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., andHolland, H.L. (1985). “Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis.”Journal of Applied Psychology,70, 401–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., Fisher, R.P., MacKinnon, D.P., &Holland, H.L. (1986). “Enhancement of eyewitness memory with the cognitive interview.”American Journal of Psychology,99, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiselman, R.E., &Padilla, J. (1988). “Interviewing child witnesses with the cognitive interview.”Journal of Police Science and Administration,16, 236–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R. (1991). “A field and experimental evaluation of three methods of interviewing witnesses/victims of crime.” Master's Thesis, Polytechnic of East London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R. &Clifford, B. (1992). “Making the most of witnesses.”Policing,8, 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, L.L. (1983). “Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,22, 485–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehnken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A., & Bull, R. (1992, September). “A meta-analysis on the effects of the cognitive interview.”Third European Conference on Law and Psychology. Oxford, England.

  • Kohnken, G., Thuerer, C., & Zoberbier, D. (1992). “The cognitive interview: Are the interviewers' memories enhanced, too?” University of Kiel, Manuscript under review.

  • Malpass, R.S. &Devine, P.G. (1981). “Guided memory in eyewitness identification.”Journal of Applied Psychology,66, 343–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A. &Bull, R. (1991). “The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation and practical implications.”Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology,1, 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A., Cronin, O., Eaves, R., & Bull, R. (1992). “The cognitive interview and child witnesses.” InChildren, evidence, and procedure, British Psychological Society Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology Occasional Paper No. 19.

  • Saywitz, K.J., Geiselman, R.E., &Bernstein, G.K. (1992). “Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance.”Journal of Applied Psychology,77, 744–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1983). “Hypnotic memory enhancement of witnesses: Does it work?”Psychological Bulletin,94, 384–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (1979). “Remembering in and out of context.”Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Learning and Memory,5, 460–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving, E. (1974). “Cue-dependent forgetting.”American Scientist,62, 74–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, B.J. (1969). “Attributes of memory.”Psychological Review,76, 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westcott, H.L. (1992). “Cognitive interview: Useful tool for social workers?”British Journal of Social Work,22, 519533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitten, W., &Leonard, J. (1981). “Directed search through autobiographical memory.”Memory and Cognition,9, 566–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, D. (1970). “Encoding categories of words: An empirical approach to meaning.”Psychological Review,77, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geiselman, R.E., Taras, L., Schaap, R. et al. Recall of constituent elements from multiple episodes of an event using the cognitive interview. JPCP 10, 1–7 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02803662

Keywords

Navigation