Skip to main content
Log in

Linking arson incidents on the basis of crime scene behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigated the possibility of statistically linking arson cases based on consistency of behaviors from one crime scente to another. Serial and spree arson cases were studied to differentiate underlying themes and to link cases committed by the same offender. The material consisted of 248 arson cases which formed 42 series of arsons. A content analysis using 45 dichotomous variables was carried out and principal compnents (PCA) analysis was performed to identify underlying themes. Summary scores reflecting the themes were calculated. Linking effectiveness was tested with a discriminant analysis using the summary scores. The PCA analysis was successful and underlying themes which were in accordance with previous studies could be identified. Six factors were retained, in the PCA. The linking of the arson cases was possible to a satisfactory level: 33% of the cases could be correctly linked and for over 50% of the cases, the series they actually belonged to was among the ten series identified as most probable on the basis of the linking analysis. From a practical point of view, the results could be used as a basis for developing support systems for police investigations of arson.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alison, L., Bennell, C., Mokros, A., & Ormeord, D. (2002). The Personality Paradox in Offender Profiling, a theoretical review of the processes involved in deriving background characteristics from crime scene actions.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 8, 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennell, C. & Canter, D. V. (2002). Linking commercial burglary by modus operandi; tests using regression and ROC analysis.Science and Justice, 42, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, P. F., & Hays, B. J. (1992). The Kappa statistics for establishing interrater reliability in the secondary analysis of qualitative clinical data.Research in Nursing and Health 15, 153–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. (1995). Psychology of offender profiling. In R. Bull and D. Carson (eds.)Handbook of psychology in legal contexts. Chichtester England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. & Fritzon, K. (1998) Differentiating arsonists: A model of fire setting actions and characteristics.Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. & Gregory, A. (1994). Identifying the residential location of rapists.Journal of the Forensic Science Society, 34, 169–175.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. & Heritage, R. (1990). A multivariate model of sexual offence behavior: Developments in offender profiling' I.The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry 1, 185–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. & Larkin, P. (1993). The Environmental range of serial rapists.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13, 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comish, D. B. & Clarke, R. V. G. (eds) (1986).The reasoning criminal: Rational, choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. E., Burgess, A. W., Burgess, A. G., & Ressler, R. K. (1992).Crime classification manual New York, NY, US: Lexington Book Macmillan, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1989). Self-reported and official offending from adolescence to adulthood. In M. W. Klein (ed.)Cross-national research in self-reported crime and delinquency (pp 399–423). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzon, K. (2001) An examination of the relationship between distance travelled and motivational aspects of arson.Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzon, K., Canter, D. & Wilton, Z. (2001) The application of an action systems model to destructive behaviour: The examples of Arson and Terrorism.Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 657–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harnan, H. H. (1976).Modern factor analysis. Chicago, Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R. (1969).Content analysis for the social sciences: and humanities. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häkkänen H., Puolakka, P., & Santtila P. (in press). Crime scene actions and offender characteristics in arson.

  • Home Office (1999) Safer Communities: Towards effective arson control. The Report of the Arson Scoping Study.

  • Jackson, H.F. (1994). Assessment of Firesetters. In M. McMurran and J. Hodge (eds.)Assessment of criminal behaviours of clients in secure settings, pp. 94–126. Jessica Kingsley: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, H.F., Glass, C. & Hope, S. (1987), A functional analysis of recidivistic arson.British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 175–185.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorf, K. (1980).Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacCulloch, M.J., Snowden, P.R., Wood P.J.W. & Mills, H. E. (1983) Sadistic fantasy, sadistie behaviour and offending.Britisch Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 20–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D.C. (1980). Is Personality Consistent? In A.I. Rabin, J. Arnoff, A.M. Barclay and R.A. Zucker (Eds.)Further explorations in personality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. and Fritzon, K. Functional consistency across two behavioural modalities: Firesetting and self harm in female, special hospital patients Submitted toCriminal Behaviour and Mental Health.

  • Pervin, L.A. (1989).Personality Theory and research. J. Wiley & Sons.

  • Pulkkinen, L. (1983). The search for alternatives to aggression. In A.P. Goldstein and M.H. Segal, (eds)Aggression in Global perspectives (pp. 104–144). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santtila, P., Häkkänen, H. & Fritzon, K. (2003). Inferring the characteristics of an arsonist from crime scene behaviour: a case study in offender profiling.International Journal of Police Science and Management, 5(1) 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapp, A.D., Huff, T. G., Gary G. P., Icove, D.J. & Horbert, P. (1994). A report of essential findings from a study of serial arsonists. Quantico, Virginia. National Centre for the Analysis of Violent Crime, FBI Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shye, S. (1985). Nonmetric multivariate models for behavioral, action, systems. In D. Canter (Ed.)Facet, theory Approaches to social research pp 97–148). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shye, S., Elizur, D., & Hoffman, M. (1994).Introduction to facet theory: Content design and intrensite data analysis in behavioural research. London, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001).Using multivariate statistics. New York: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pekka Santtila.

Additional information

This research was financially supported by the Finnish Ministry of Interior and by Grant 54456 from the Academy of Finland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Santtila, P., Fritzon, K. & Tamelander, A.L. Linking arson incidents on the basis of crime scene behavior. J Police Crim Psych 19, 1–16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02802570

Keywords

Navigation