Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the 2004 hurricanes on the fish assemblages in two proximate southwest Florida estuaries: Change in the context of interannual variability

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We examined interannual differences in fish assemblage structure in Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor, Florida, from 1996 to 2005 to reveal the extent of hurricane-induced changes in relation to multiannual variability for five different assemblages in each estuary: small-bodied fishes (<generally 80-mm standard length) along river shorelines, in river channels, along bay shorelines, and on the bay shelf (<1.5-m water depth); and large-bodied fishes (>generally 100-mm standard length) along bay shorelines. Fish assemblages tended to differ, between estuaries, as did interannual variability in assemblage structure. In the lower portions of tributary rivers to Tampa Bay, the small-bodied shoreline fish assemblage during August 2004 to July 2005, i.e., during and after the multiple hurricanes, was different from assemblages of August to July in previous years. This may have been a result of physical displacement of fish or suboptimal salinities caused by increased freshwater inflow. The small-bodied shoreline fish assemblage in Charlotte Harbor also differed between prehurricane and hurricane periods, possibly because damage to vegetated shorelines affected fish survival through a decrease in feeding and refuge habitats. In the remaining habitats, fish assemblage structure from August 2004 to July 2005 were within the range of variability exhibited over the 9-yr study period. There were several unusual fish assemblages that appeared to be attributable to drought conditions (1996, 1999–2000), suggesting that other major environmental perturbations may be as important as hurricanes in influencing assemblage structure. We conclude that although the 2004 hurricane season affected some of the fish assemblages of Tampa Bay and charlotte Harbor, these assemblages generally appeared quite resilient to natural environmental perturbations from a decadal perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adams, A. J.. 2001. Effects of a hurricane on two assemblages of coral reef fishes: Multiple-year analysis reverses a false ‘snapshot’ interpretationBulletin of Marine Science 69:341–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, A. J. andJ. P. Ebersole. 2004. Resistance of coral reef fishes in back reef and lagoon habitats to a hurricane.Bulletin of Marine Science 75:101–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, C., S. Jacob, andS. Smith. 2002. What Happened After the Net Ban? Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray, J. R. andJ. T. Curtis. 1957. An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin.Ecological Monographs 27: 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. E., K. R. Clarke, andR. M. Warwick. 2002. Serial patterns of biodiversity change in corals across shallow reef flats in Ko Phuket, Thailand, due to the effects of local (sedimentation) and regional (climatic) perturbations.Marine Biology 141:21–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkholder, J., D. Eggleston, H. Glasgow, C. Brownie, R. Reed, G. Janowitz, M. Posey, G. Melia, C. Kinder, R. Corbett, D. Toms, T. Alphin, N. Deamer, andJ. Springer. 2004. Comparative impacts of two major hurricance seasons on the Neuse River and western Pamlico Sound ecosystems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 101:9291–9296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R.. 1993. Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure.Australian Journal of Ecology 18:117–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K. R. andR. M. Warwick. 2001. Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, 2nd edition. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. andF. Dewally. 1995. The structure and components of European estuarine fish assemblages.Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology 29:397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. A. D. andK. T. Frank. 2002. Changes in finfish community structure associated with an offshore fishery closed area on the Scotian Shelf.Marine Ecology Progress Series 240:249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, M. S., E. B. Peebles, andR. T. Montgomery. 2002. A percent-of-flow approach for managing reduction of freshwater inflows from unimpounded rivers to southwest Florida estuaries.Estuaries 25:1318–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galperin, B., A. F. Blumberg, andR. H. Weisberg. 1991. A time-dependent three-dimensional model of circulation in Tampa Bay, p. 77–97.In S. F. Treat and P. A. Clark (eds.), Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium. Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Tampa, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, A. M., J. P. Vieira, andK. O. Winemiller. 2001. Dynamics of the shallow-water fish assemblage of the Patos Lagoon estuary (Brazil) during cold and warm ENSO episodes.Journal of Fish Biology 59:1218–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genner, M. J., D. W. Sims, V. J. Wearmouth, E. J. Southall, A. J. Southward, P. A. Henderson, andS. J. Hawkins. 2004. Regional climatic warming drives long-term community changes of British marine fish.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 271:655–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. G., L. H. Bullock, andF. H. Berry. 1978. Hypothermal mortality in marine fishes of south-central Florida, January, 1977.Northeast Gulf Science 2:77–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, S. B., C. W. Landsea, A. M. Mestas-Nunez, andW. M. Gray. 2001. The recent increase in Atlantic hurricance activity: Causes and implications.Science 293:474–479.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, S. M. andK. W. Able. 2003. Seasonal changes of the pelagic fish assemblage in a temperate estuary.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 56:15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idelberger, C. F. andM. F. D. Greenwood. 2005. Seasonal variation in fish assemblages within the estuarine portions of the Myakka and Peace Rivers, southwest Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 23:224–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliff, J. W., L. Dipinto, andM. Miller. 2001. Groundings and spills: Andressing anthropogenic insults through natural resource damage assessment and restoration.Proceedings of the Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute 52:622–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, R. Q., J. P. Chen, C. Y. Lin, andK. T. Shao. 2001. Long-term monitoring of the coral reef fish communities around a nuclear power plant.Aquatic Ecology 35:233–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J. B. andP. J. Rousseeuw. 1990. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W. J.. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco Estuary.Estuaries 25:1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, R. T. andD. H. Secor. 2005. Connectivity in estuarine white perch populations of Chesapeake Bay: Evidence from historical fisheries data.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 64:108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupschus, S. andD. Tremain. 2001. Associations between fish assemblages and environmental factors in nearshore habitats of a subtropical estuary.Journal of Fish Biology 58:1383–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. R. andE. D. Estevez. 1988. The Ecology of Tampa Bay, Florida: An Estuarine Profile. U.S. Fish Wildlife Service Biological Report 85(7.18) U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maes, J., M. Stevens, andF. Ollevier 2005. The composition and community structure of the ichthyofauna of the upper Scheldt estuary: Synthesis of a 10-year data collection (1991–2001).Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21:86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. A. andC. A. Corbett. 2006. How hurricane attributes determine the extent of environmental Effects: Multiple hurricanes and different coastal systems.Estuaries and Coasts 29:1046–1061.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, F. J., N. R. Loneragan, G. A. Skilleter, andS. R. Phinn. 2005. An evaluation of the evidence for linkages between mangroves and fisheries: A synthesis of the literature and identification of research directions.Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review 43:485–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, J., I. Codling, P. Drake, M. Elliott, L. Pihl, andJ. Rebelo. 2002. Environmental quality of estuaries, p. 322–409.In M. Elliott and K. L. Hemingway (eds.), Fishes in Estuaries. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Massachusetts.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matheson, Jr.,R. E., R. H. McMichael Jr.,D. L. Leffler, andT. C. MacDonald. 2005. Populations of juvenile and small-adult fishes in Tampa Bay: A decadal perspective, p. 3–18.In S. F. Treat (ed.), Proceedings, Tampa Bay Area Scientific Information Symposium, BASIS 4: 27–30. Tampa Bay Estuary Program, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, B. F. andR. L. Miller. 1994. Cause of light attenuation in Tampa Bay and Charlotte Harbor, southwestern Florida.Water Resources Bulletin 30:43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, B. F., R. L. Miller, andY. E. Stoker. 1996. Physical, Chemical, and Biological Characteristics of the Charlotte Harbor Basin and Estuarine System in Southwestern Florida-A Summary of the 1982–89 U.S. Geological Survey Charlotte Harbor Assessment and Other Studies. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2486. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaco, M. E., T. A. Lowery, andR. L. Emmett. 1992. Assemblages of U.S. West coast estuaries based on the distribution of fishes.Journal of Biogeography 19:251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. S., E. J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Pérez, L. T. Findley, C. R. Gilbert, R. N. Lea, andJ. D. Williams. 2004. Common and Scientific Names of Fishes From the United States, Canada, and Mexico, 6th edition. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paerl, H. W., J. D. Bales, L. W. Nusley, C. P. Buzzelli, L. B. Crowder, L. A. Eby, J. M. Fear, M. Go, G. L. Peierls, T. L. Richardson, andJ. S. Ramus. 2001. Ecosystem impacts of three sequential hurricanes (Dennis, Floyd, and Irene) on the United States' largest lagoonal estuary, Pamlico Sound, NC.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98:5655–5660.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paperno, R., K. J. Mille, andE. Kadidon. 2001. Patterns in species composition of fish and selected invertebrate assemblages in estuarine subregions near Ponce de Leon Inlet, Florida.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 52:117–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, I. C., P. N. Claridge, andR. M. Warwick. 1986. Consistency of seasonal changes in an estuarine fish assemblage.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 32:217–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poulakis, G. R., D. A. Blewett, andM. E. Mitchell. 2003. The Effects of Season and Proximity to Fringing Mangroves on Seagrass-Associated Fish Communities in Charlotte Harbor, Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 21:171–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulakis, G. R., R. E. Matheson Jr.M. E. Mitchell, D. A. Blewett, andC. F. Idelberger. 2004. Fishes of the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 22:117–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozas, L. P. andD. J. Reed. 1994. Comparing nekton assemblages of subtidal habitats in pipeline canals traversing brackish and saline marshes in coastal Louisiana.Wetlands 14:262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydene, D. A. andR. E. Matheson Jr.. 2003. Dinurnal fish density in relation to seagrass and drift algae cover in Tampa Bay, Florida.Gulf of Mexico Science 21:35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallenger, A. H., H. F. Stockdon, L. Fauver, M. Hansen, D. Thompson, C. W. Wright, andJ. Lillycrop. 2006. Hurricanes 2004: An overview of their characteristics and coastal change.Estuaries and Coasts 29:880–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharf, F. S.. 2000. Patterns in abundance, growth, and mortality of juvenile red drum across estuaries on the Texas coast with implications for recruitment and stock enhancement.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:1207–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N., E. K. Lipp, J. B. Rose, andM. E. Luther. 2001. ENSO influences on seasonal rainfall and river discharge in Florida.Journal of Climate 14:615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N., M. E. Luther, andR. Johns. 2004. Climate variability and estuarine water resources: A case study from Tampa Bay, Florida.Coastal Management 32:101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, P. S.. 1998. Circulation in the Charlotte Harbor Estuarine System, p. 91–110,In S. F. Treat (ed.), Proceedings of the Charlotte Harbor Public Conference and Technical Symposium. South Florida Water Management District and Charlotte Harbor National Estuary Program, West Palm Beach and North Fort Myers, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerfield, P. J., K. R. Clarke, andF. Olsgard. 2002. A comparison of the power of categorical and correlational tests applied to community ecology data from gradient studies.Journal of Animal Ecology 71:581–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, V. G., andK. D. Woodburn. 1960. An Ecological Study of the Fishes of the Tampa Bay Area. Florida State Board of Conservation Marine Laboratory Professional Papers Series. Florida State Board of Conservation Marine Laboratory, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. W., D. A. Blewett, andJ. P. Casey. 2006. Short-term effects of a low dissolved oxygen event on estuarine fish assemblages following the passage of Hurricane Charley.Estuaries and Coasts 29:997–1003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoner, A. W.. 1983. Distribution of fishes in sea grass meadows: Role of macrophyte biomass and species composition.Fishery Bulletin 81:837–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabb, D. C. andA. C. Jones. 1962. Effect of Hurricane Donna on the aquatic fauna of north Florida Bay,Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 91:375–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsou, T. S. andR. E. Matheson Jr.. 2002. Seasonal changes in the nekton community of the Suwannec River estuary and the potential impacts of freshwater withdrawal.Estuaries 25:1372–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, D. A., M. A. Champ, D. A. Flemer, andA. J. Mearns. 1987. Long-term biological data sets: Their role in research, monitoring, and management of estuarine and coastal marine systems.Estuaries 10:181–193.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Source of Unpublished Materials

  • McMichael, R. H. unpublished data. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, 100 8th Avenue SE, St. Petersburg, Florida 33701.

  • Tomasko, D. A., personal communication, PBS & J. 5300 West Cypress Street, Suite 300 Tampa, Florida 33607.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marin F. D. Greenwood.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenwood, M.F.D., Stevens, P.W. & Matheson, R.E. Effects of the 2004 hurricanes on the fish assemblages in two proximate southwest Florida estuaries: Change in the context of interannual variability. Estuaries and Coasts: J ERF 29, 985–996 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02798660

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02798660

Keywords

Navigation