Skip to main content
Log in

The generalized continuum hypothesis revisited

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We can reformulate the generalized continuum problem as: for regular κ<λ we have λ to the power κ is λ, We argue that the reasonable reformulation of the generalized continuum hypothesis, considering the known independence results, is “for most pairs κ<λ of regular cardinals, λ to the revised power of κ is equal to λ”. What is the revised power? λ to the revised power of κ is the minimal cardinality of a family of subsets of λ each of cardinality κ such that any other subset of λ of cardinality κ is included in the union of strictly less than κ members of the family. We still have to say what “for most” means. The interpretation we choose is: for every λ, for every large enoughK < ℶ w . Under this reinterpretation, we prove the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • [AAC90] D. L. Alben, G. L. Alexanderson and C. Reid (eds.),More Mathematical People, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1990.

  • [Br] F. E. Browder (ed.),Mathematical developments arising from Hilbert’s Problems, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics28 (1974), 421.

  • [FW] M. Foreman and H. Woodin,The generalized continuum hypothesis can fail everywhere, Annals of Mathematics133 (1991), 1–36.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [GiSh 344] M. Gitik and S. Shelah,On certain, destructibility of strong cardinals and a question of Hajnal, Archive for Mathematical Logic28 (1989), 35–42.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Gre] J. Gregory,Higher Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis, Journal of Symbolic Logic41 (1976), 663–671.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [HJSh 249] A. Hajnal, I. Juhász, and S. ShelahSplitting strongly almost disjoint families, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society295 (1986), 369–387.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [HLSh 162] B. Hart, C. Laflamme, and S. Shelah,Models with second order properties, V: A General principle, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic64 (1993), 169–194.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [LaPiRo] M. C. Laskowski, A. Pillay, and P. Rothmaler,Tiny models of categorical theories, Archive for Mathematical Logic31 (1992), 385–396.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh:E12] S. Shelah,Analytical Guide and Corrections to [Sh:g],

  • [Sh 575] S. Shelah,Cellularity of free products of Boolean algebras (or topologies), Fundamenta Mathematica, to appear.

  • [Sh 668] S. Shelah,On Arhangelskii’s Problem, e-preprint.

  • [Sh 666] S. Shelah,On what I do not understand (and have something to say) I, Fundamenta Mathematica, to appear.

  • [Sh 513] S. Shelah,PCF and infinite free subsets, Archive for Mathematical Logic, to appear.

  • [Sh 589] S. Shelah,PCF theory: applications, Journal of Symbolic Logic, to appear.

  • [Sh 108] S. Shelah,On successors of singular cardinals, inLogic Colloquium ’78 (Mons, 1978), Vol. 97 ofStudies in Logic Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam-New York, 1979, pp. 357–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 82] S. Shelah,Models with second order properties. III. Omitting types for L(Q), Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung21 (1981), 1–11.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 351] S. Shelah,Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic31 (1991), 25–53.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 400a] S. Shelah,Cardinal arithmetic for skeptics, American Mathematical Society. Bulletin. New Series26 (1992), 197–210.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 420] S. Shelah,Advances in cardinal arithmetic, inFinite and Infinite Combinatorics in Sets and Logic (N.W. Sauer et al., eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 355–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 410] S. Shelah,More on cardinal arithmetic, Archive for Mathematical Logic32 (1993), 399–428.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh:g] S. Shelah,Cardinal Arithmetic, Vol. 29 ofOxford Logic Guides, Oxford University Press, 1994.

  • [Sh 454a] S. Shelah,Cardinalities of topologies with small base, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic68 (1994), 95–113.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • [Sh 430] S. Shelah,Further cardinal arithmetic, Israel Journal of Mathematics95 (1996), 61–114.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saharon Shelah.

Additional information

Partially supported by the Israeli Basic Research Fund and the BSF. The author wishes to thank Alice Leonhardt for the beautiful typing. Publication No. 460

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shelah, S. The generalized continuum hypothesis revisited. Isr. J. Math. 116, 285–321 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773223

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02773223

Keywords

Navigation