Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Note-taking: A significant and integral part of learning environments

  • Article
  • Published:
ECTJ Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although note-taking is an important representation of the knowledge transition that takes place in formal learning environments, surprisingly, it has largely been ignored by the educational community as a phenomenon of study. This article makes a case for note-taking as an entity for study in the domain of educational technology. Research done to date is reviewed, and possible research questions are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S. & Shennum, W. A. Memory for a lecture: Effect of notes, lecture rate, and informational density.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975,67(3), 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, W. A. The relationship between student note-taking during an instructional television lesson and student learning (Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, 1976).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976,37, 5540A. (University Microfilms No. 77-5766)

    Google Scholar 

  • Annis, L. & Davis, J. K. The effect of encoding and an external memory device on note-taking.Journal of Experimental Education, 1975,44(2), 44–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, P. & Carlton, B. J. The value of note-taking during film learning.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1953,23, 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. The effects of test-like events and note-taking on learning from lecture instruction (Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 1969).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1969,29, 3864A. (University Microfilms No. 69-08152)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C.Aptitude treatment interactions in two studies of learning from lecture instruction. Berkeley, Calif.: Far West Lab for Educational Research and Development, 1971. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 046 249)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bizinkaukas, P. A. An evaluation of the effectiveness of tape recorder note-taking versus rereading as a study technique (Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1970).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1970,31, 05A. (University Microfilms No. 70-22496)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S.Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S. M. The efficacy of instruction in notetaking.Journal of Educational Psycholgy, 1935,26(3), 188–194. (a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey, S. M. Making notes from lectures and readings.Journal of Educational Research, 1935,29(3), 204–209. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. C.A qualitative study of the results of note-taking in college classes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago, 1924.

  • Crawford, C. C. The correlation between college lecture notes and quiz papers.Journal of Educational Research, 1925,12(4), 283–291. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, C. C. Some experimental studies on the results of college note-taking.Journal of Educational Research, 1925,12(5), 379–386. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. K. Task analysis: Some process and content concerns.AV Communication Review, 1973,21(1), 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiVesta, F. J. & Dick, W. The test-retest reliability of children’s ratings on the semantic differential.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1966,26(2), 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiVesta, F. J. & Gray, G. S. Listening and note-taking.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63(1), 8–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiVesta, F. J. & Gray, G. S. Listening and note-taking: II. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations of thematic continuity, note-taking, and length of listening-review intervals.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,64(3), 278–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, J. L. A study of the effectiveness of a guided note-taking and study skills system upon the level of academic success among entering University of Idaho freshmen (Doctoral dissertation, University of Idaho, 1976).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1976,37, 1305A. (University Microfilms No. 76-21, 235)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, S. & Rohde, K. Notetaking during and after the lecture.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1959,50(6), 301–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. & Harris, M. B. Effect of note-taking and review on recall.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973,65(3), 321–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. & Harris, M. B. Effect of note-taking preference and types of notes taken on memory.Psychological Reports, 1974,35(1), 384–386. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. L. & Harris, M. B. Note-taking and recall.Journal of Educational Research, 1974,67(7), 291–292. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganske, L. A naturalistic investigation of note-taking behaviors as indices of cognitive and affective knowledge (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1977).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1978,38, 6477A. (University Microfilms No. 78-05597)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. Mathetics: The technology of education.The Journal of Mathetics, 1962,2(1), 7–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E. B. Certain aspects of lecture, reading, and guided reading.School and Society, 1934,39(1011), 619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J.Strategies for programmed instruction: An educational technology. London: Butterworths, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. & Marshall, S. On notes and note-taking.Universities Quarterly, 1974,28(2), 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A. Note-taking strategy review and long-term retention of verbal information.Journal of Educational Research, 1970,63(6), 285. (a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A. Using student’ notes to examine the role of the individual learner in acquiring meaningful subject matter.Journal of Educational Research, 1970,64(2), 61–63. (b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, M. J. A. The utility of taking notes as an aid to learning.Educational Research, 1974,16(3), 222–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R.The nature of psychological inquiry. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F. N.Foundations of behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavin, M. H. The relative effectiveness of three types of notes used as adjunct study activities to group audiovisual instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, 1971).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1971,32, 5040A. (University Microfilms No. 72-08278)

    Google Scholar 

  • Laycock, S. R. & Russell, D. H. An analysis of thirty-eight how to study manuals.School Review, 1941,49(5), 370–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacManaway, L. A. Using lecture scripts.Universities Quarterly, 1968,22(3), 317–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClendon, P. I. An experimental study of the relationship between the note-taking practises and listening comprehension of college freshmen during expository lectures.Speech Monograph, 1958,25(3), 222–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Northcraft, G. B. & Jernstedt, G. C. Comparison of four teaching methodologies for large lecture classes.Psychological Reports, 1975,36(2), 599–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. A., Jr. Acquisition and utility of three note-taking procedures (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1968).Dissertation Abstracts International, 1968,30, 219A. (University Microfilms No. 69-08640)

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. A. Comparison of four note-taking procedures.Journal of Reading, 1971,14(4), 235–240, 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. A. & McNinch, G. Source of gains in listening skills: Experimental or pre-test experience?Journal of Communication, 1972,22(3), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, D. L. Effects of note-taking and rate of presentation on short-term objective test performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63(3), 276–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.The study of man. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.Personal knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G.The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson University Library, 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, C. B. & DiVesta, F. G. Effects of passage organization and note-taking on the selection of clustering strategies and on recall of textual materials.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972,63(3), 244–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.Contingencies of reinforcement, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P. E. An experiment on the value of film and filmstrip in instruction of adults.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1946,16, 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walberg, H. J. Models for optimizing and individualizing school learning.Interchange, 1971,2(3), 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Lethbridge, T1K 3M4, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada

    Ludwig Ganske (Associate Professor of Educational Media)

Authors
  1. Ludwig Ganske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ganske, L. Note-taking: A significant and integral part of learning environments. ECTJ 29, 155–175 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766518

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766518

Keywords

Search

Navigation