Skip to main content
Log in

Locus of control and affectivity by gender and occupational status: A 14 nation study

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the extent to which reported gender differences in values are attributable to differences in national culture and organizational seniority. Locus of control and affectivity scores were obtained from 4599 managers and employees in business organizations located in 14 countries. Across nations, men and those in senior positions were more internal and less affective. Gender effects were additional to those attributable to status. Respondents in nations scoring higher on an index of modernity were found to be less internal. A pan-cultural factor analysis of locus of control items yielded four subscales. Men and those in senior positions scored higher on Socio-Political Control and Effort, but no differences were found on the Luck and Active Friendship subscales. The results are contrasted with those obtained from single-nation samples using student subjects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamson, D., Schluderman, S., & Schluderman, E. (1973). Replications of dimensions of locus of control.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41, 320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Y. P., & Kumari, M. (1975). A study of locus of control of boys and girls of various levels of socioeconomic status.Kurukshetra University Research Journal (Arts and Humanities), 9, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakan, D. (1966).The duality of human existence. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Tal, D., & Bar-Zohar, Y. (1977). The relationship between perception of locus of control and achievement.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2, 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Best, D. L., Williams, J. E., & Briggs, S. R. (1980). A further analysis of the affective meanings associated with male and female sex-trait stereotypes.Sex Roles, 6, 735–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, R., & Husain, M. G. (1985). Openness-closeness of environmental entity, sex and age: Determinants of locus of control.Psychologia, 28, 166–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H. (1988). Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 1009–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. H., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology.Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 205–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R., Lonner, W., & Thorndike, R. M. (1973).Cross-cultural research methods. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. & 49 co-authors (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cha, J. H. (1994). Aspects of individualism and collectivism in Korea. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.),Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. L., & Cole, S. (1977). Counternormative behavior and locus of control.Journal of Social Psychology, 101, 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H. M., Burger, J. M., & Good, T. L. (1981). Gender differences in the academic locus of control beliefs of young children.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 562–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, L. R. (1961). The pattern variables: Some empirical operations.American Sociological Review, 26, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brabander, B., & Boone, C. (1990). Sex differences in perceived locus of control.Journal of Social Psychology, 130, 271–272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, W. J., & Baldwin, C. (1985). Shifts and stability in locus of control during the 1970’s: Divergence of the sexes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1048–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyal, J. A. (1984). Cross-cultural research with the locus of control construct. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.),Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 3): Extensions and limitations._New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H. (1987).Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (1981). Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies.Psychological Bulletin, 90, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 283–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1986). Gender and aggressive behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature.Psychological Bulletin, 100, 309–330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1991). Explaining sex differences in social behavior: A meta-analytic perspective.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist Book of Vital World Statistics: A Complete Guide to the World in Figures. (1990). London: Hutchinson.

  • Escovar, L. A. (1981). Dimensionality of the I-E scale: A cross-cultural comparison.International Journal of Group Tensions, 11, 17–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T. (1967). Some personality correlates of external locus of control.Australian Journal of Psychology, 19, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982).In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”. The big-five factor structure.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, A. B. (1980).The adjective checklist manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984).Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Halberstadt, A. G. (1986). Smiling and gazing. In J. S. Hyde & M. C. Linn (Eds.),The psychology of gender: Advances through meta-analysis. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980).Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P. (1989). Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.),Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorm, A. F. (1987). Sex differences in neuroticism: A quantitative synthesis of published research.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 21, 501–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalin, R., & Tilby, P. (1978). Development and validation of a sex-role ideology scale.Psychological Reports, 42, 731–738.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977).Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kashima, Y., Yamaguchi, S., Kim, U., Choi, S.-C., Gelfand, M., & Yuki, M. (1995). Culture, gender and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 925–937.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P., & Khanna, J. L. (1979). Locus of control in India: A cross-cultural perspective.International Journal of Psychology, 14, 207–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lao, R. C., Chuang, C. J., & Yang, K. S. (1977). Locus of control and Chinese college students.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 8, 299–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. K., & Dengerink, H. A. (1992). Locus of control in relation to sex and nationality: A cross-cultural study.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 288–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. (1982).Locus of control: Current trends in theory and research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefcourt, H. M. (1981).Research with the locus of control construct: Assessment methods (Vol. 1). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, C. B. (1977). Dimensionality of the internal-external control scale: Some further evidence.Journal of Genetic Psychology, 131, 329–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The psychology of sex differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1990).Personality in adulthood. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnies, E., Nordholm, L. A., Ward, C. D., & Bhanthumnavin, D. L. (1974). Sex and cultural differences in perceived locus of control in five countries.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, G. E. (1984). Locus of control, work, and retirement. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.),Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 3): Extensions and limitations. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, O. A., & Schneider, J. M. (1974). Locus of control in university students from eastern and western societies.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 456–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Shils, E. A. (1951).The social system. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Bales, R. F. (1955).Family, socialization and interaction process. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phares, E. J. (1976).Locus of control in personality. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reykowski, J. (1994). Collectivism and individualism as dimensions of social change. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.),Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.Psychological Monographs, 80(Whole No. 609).

  • Schneider, J. M., & Parsons, O. A. (1970). Categories of the locus of control scale and cross-cultural comparisons in Denmark and the United States.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.),Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., Dugan, S., & Trompenaars, F. (1995). The Rotter locus of control scale in 43 countries: A test of cultural relativity.International Journal of Psychology, 30, 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. B., Trompenaars, F., & Dugan, S. (1996). National culture and the values of organizational employees: A dimensional analysis across 43 nations.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27, 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978).Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions. correlates and antecedents. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapnell, P. D., & Wiggins, J. S. (1990). Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the big five dimensions of personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F. (1985).The organization of meaning and the meaning of organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Watson, J. M. (1981). A note on the dimensionality of the Rotter locus of control scale.Australian Journal of Psychology, 33, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982).Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990).Sex and Psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi, S. (1994). Collectivism among the Japanese: A perspective from the self. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S.-C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.),Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. S. (1988). Will modernization eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In M. H. Bond (Ed.),The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuchtman, Y. E., & Shapira, R. (1981). Sex as a status characteristic: An examination of sex differences in locus of control.Sex Roles, 7, 149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We acknowledge receipt of ESRC Grant R 000 22 1552, which aided the completion of this study, and the helpful comments of Michael Bond and John E. Williams upon an earlier version.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, P.B., Dugan, S. & Trompenaars, F. Locus of control and affectivity by gender and occupational status: A 14 nation study. Sex Roles 36, 51–77 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766238

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766238

Keywords

Navigation