Abstract
Purpose: Our purpose was to measure changes in semen quality and quantity in young healthy sperm donors in Jerusalem over time.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of semen parameters over 15 years using linear regression analysis, in a single sperm bank in a tertiary university center. Study population consisted of 188 young, healthy medical students, aged 20 to 30 years, who donated sperm samples for Artificial insemination between 1980 and 1995.
Results: There were no statistically significant changes in semen concentration and motility during the study period. The mean semen volume increased by 0.1 ml (5.1%) per year (P < 0.0001), with a concomitant mean rise of 5.8 × 106 (7.7%) per year in total motile sperm count. The percentage normal morphology decreased by a mean of 1.04% per year during the entire period (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: During the past 15 years, there has been an increase in total motile sperm count, secondary to an increase in semen volume, and a decline in normal morphology that are independent of the age and the duration of abstinence in fertile men.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Macomber D, Sanders M: The spermatozoa count: Its value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. Engl J Med 1929;200:981–984
MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility II. Spermatozoon counts in 1,000 men of known fertility and in 1,000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951;66:436–448
Nelson CMK, Bunge RG: Semen analysis. Evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. Fertil Steril 1974;25:503–507
Naghma-E-Rehan, Sobrero AJ, Fertig JW: The semen of fertile men: statistical analysis of 1300 men. Fertil Steril 1975;26:492–502
Sheriff DS: Setting standards for male fertility. I. Semen analysis in 1500 patients—a report. Andrologia 1983;15:687–692
Wang C, Chan SYW, Leung A, Ng RP, Ng M, Tang LCH: Cross-sectional study of semen parameters in a large group of normal Chinese men. Int J Androl 1985;8:257–274
Kirei BR: Semen characteristics in 120 fertile Tanzanian men. East Afr Med J 1987;64:453–457
Carlesen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE: Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past 50 years. BMJ 1992;305:609–613
Bostofte E, Serup J, Rebbe H: Has the fertility of Danish men declined through the years in terms of semen quality? Int J Fertil 1983;28:91–95
Leto S, Frensilli FJ: Changing parameters of donor semen. Fertil Steril 1981;36:766–770
Auger J, Kuntsmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P: Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the last 20 years. Engl NJ Med 1995;332:281–285
Iryine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J: Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: Birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ 1996;312:467–470
Fish H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH: Semen analysis in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period. no decline in quality. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1009–1014
Paulsen CA, Berman NG, Wang C: Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: Further evidence that deterioration in semen quality is not geographically uniform. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1015–1020
Fish H, Goluboff ER: Geographic variations in sperm count: A potential cause in bias in semen quality. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1044–1046
Bujan L, Mansat A, Pontonnier F, Miusset R: Time sereies analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992. BMJ 1996;312:471–472
Schwartz D, Mayaux M-J, Spira A, Moscato M-L, Jouannet P, Czyglik E: Semen characteristics as a function of age in 833 fertile men. Fertil Steril 1983;39:530–535
Jouannet P, Czyglik F, David G,et al.: Study of a group of 484 men. Distribution of semen characteristics. Int J Androl 1981;4:440–449
Suominen J, Vierula M: Semen quality of Finnish men. BMJ 1993;306:1579
Tummon IS, Mortimer D: Decreasing quality of semen. BMJ 1992;305:1228–1229
Brake A, Krause W: Decreasing quality of semen. BMJ 1992;305:1498
Macleod J, Wang Y: Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: A review of the past, a study of the present. Fertil Steril 1979;31:103–116
Ginsburg J, Okolo S, Prelevic G, Hardiman P: Residence in the London area and sperm density. Lancet 1994;343:230
Giwercman A, Carlesen E, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE: Evidence for increasing incidence of abnormalities of the human testis: A review. Environ Health Perspect 1993;101 (Suppl 2):65–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Benshushan, A., Shoshani, O., Paltiel, O. et al. Is there really a decrease in sperm parameters among healthy young men? A survey of sperm donations during 15 years. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 347–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765840
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765840