Skip to main content
Log in

Is there really a decrease in sperm parameters among healthy young men? A survey of sperm donations during 15 years

  • Andrology
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Our purpose was to measure changes in semen quality and quantity in young healthy sperm donors in Jerusalem over time.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of semen parameters over 15 years using linear regression analysis, in a single sperm bank in a tertiary university center. Study population consisted of 188 young, healthy medical students, aged 20 to 30 years, who donated sperm samples for Artificial insemination between 1980 and 1995.

Results: There were no statistically significant changes in semen concentration and motility during the study period. The mean semen volume increased by 0.1 ml (5.1%) per year (P < 0.0001), with a concomitant mean rise of 5.8 × 106 (7.7%) per year in total motile sperm count. The percentage normal morphology decreased by a mean of 1.04% per year during the entire period (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: During the past 15 years, there has been an increase in total motile sperm count, secondary to an increase in semen volume, and a decline in normal morphology that are independent of the age and the duration of abstinence in fertile men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Macomber D, Sanders M: The spermatozoa count: Its value in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of sterility. Engl J Med 1929;200:981–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. MacLeod J, Gold RZ: The male factor in fertility and infertility II. Spermatozoon counts in 1,000 men of known fertility and in 1,000 cases of infertile marriage. J Urol 1951;66:436–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nelson CMK, Bunge RG: Semen analysis. Evidence for changing parameters of male fertility potential. Fertil Steril 1974;25:503–507

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Naghma-E-Rehan, Sobrero AJ, Fertig JW: The semen of fertile men: statistical analysis of 1300 men. Fertil Steril 1975;26:492–502

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheriff DS: Setting standards for male fertility. I. Semen analysis in 1500 patients—a report. Andrologia 1983;15:687–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang C, Chan SYW, Leung A, Ng RP, Ng M, Tang LCH: Cross-sectional study of semen parameters in a large group of normal Chinese men. Int J Androl 1985;8:257–274

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirei BR: Semen characteristics in 120 fertile Tanzanian men. East Afr Med J 1987;64:453–457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlesen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE: Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past 50 years. BMJ 1992;305:609–613

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bostofte E, Serup J, Rebbe H: Has the fertility of Danish men declined through the years in terms of semen quality? Int J Fertil 1983;28:91–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Leto S, Frensilli FJ: Changing parameters of donor semen. Fertil Steril 1981;36:766–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Auger J, Kuntsmann JM, Czyglik F, Jouannet P: Decline in semen quality among fertile men in Paris during the last 20 years. Engl NJ Med 1995;332:281–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Iryine S, Cawood E, Richardson D, MacDonald E, Aitken J: Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: Birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years. BMJ 1996;312:467–470

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fish H, Goluboff ET, Olson JH, Feldshuh J, Broder SJ, Barad DH: Semen analysis in 1,283 men from the United States over a 25-year period. no decline in quality. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1009–1014

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paulsen CA, Berman NG, Wang C: Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: Further evidence that deterioration in semen quality is not geographically uniform. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1015–1020

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fish H, Goluboff ER: Geographic variations in sperm count: A potential cause in bias in semen quality. Fertil Steril 1995;65:1044–1046

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bujan L, Mansat A, Pontonnier F, Miusset R: Time sereies analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992. BMJ 1996;312:471–472

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz D, Mayaux M-J, Spira A, Moscato M-L, Jouannet P, Czyglik E: Semen characteristics as a function of age in 833 fertile men. Fertil Steril 1983;39:530–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jouannet P, Czyglik F, David G,et al.: Study of a group of 484 men. Distribution of semen characteristics. Int J Androl 1981;4:440–449

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Suominen J, Vierula M: Semen quality of Finnish men. BMJ 1993;306:1579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tummon IS, Mortimer D: Decreasing quality of semen. BMJ 1992;305:1228–1229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brake A, Krause W: Decreasing quality of semen. BMJ 1992;305:1498

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Macleod J, Wang Y: Male fertility potential in terms of semen quality: A review of the past, a study of the present. Fertil Steril 1979;31:103–116

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ginsburg J, Okolo S, Prelevic G, Hardiman P: Residence in the London area and sperm density. Lancet 1994;343:230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Giwercman A, Carlesen E, Keiding N, Skakkebaek NE: Evidence for increasing incidence of abnormalities of the human testis: A review. Environ Health Perspect 1993;101 (Suppl 2):65–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benshushan, A., Shoshani, O., Paltiel, O. et al. Is there really a decrease in sperm parameters among healthy young men? A survey of sperm donations during 15 years. J Assist Reprod Genet 14, 347–353 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765840

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765840

Key Words

Navigation