Skip to main content
Log in

The consistency strength of “every stationary set reflects”

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The consistency strength of a regular cardinal so that every stationary set reflects is the same as that of a regular cardinal with a normal idealI so that everyI-positive set reflects in aI-positive set. We call such a cardinal areflection cardinal and such an ideal areflection ideal. The consistency strength is also the same as the existence of a regular cardinal κ so that every κ-free (abelian) group is κ+-free. In L, the first reflection cardinal is greater than the first greatly Mahlo cardinal and less than the first weakly compact cardinal (if any).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Baumgartner,A new class of order types, Ann. Math. Logic9 (1976), 187–222.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Baumgartner, A. Taylor and S. Wagon,On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals, J. Symb. Logic42 (1976), 203–214.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Eklof,On the existence of κ-free abelian groups, Proc. Am. Math. Soc.47 (1975), 65–72.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Gitik and S. Shelah,Cardinal preserving ideals, J. Symb. Logic, to appear.

  5. L. Harrington and S. Shelah,Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory, Notre Dame J. Formal Logic26 (1985), 178–188.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Jech and S. Shelah,Full reflection of stationary sets at regular cardinals, to appear.

  7. A. Kanamori and M. Magidor,The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory, inHigher Set Theory, Lecture Notes in Math.669, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99–275.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Kunen,Saturated ideals, J. Symb. Logic43 (1978), 65–76.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Magidor,On reflecting stationary sets, J. Symb. Logic47 (1982), 755–771.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Magidor and S. Shelah,When does almost free imply free? (For group, transversal etc.), preprint.

  11. K. Prikry and R. Solovay,On partitions into stationary sets, J. Symb. Logic40 (1970), 75–80.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Shelah,Models with second order properties. III. Omitting types for L(Q), Arch. Math. Logik*21 (1980), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by NSERC grant # A8948.

Publication # 367. Research partially supported by the BSF.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mekler, A.H., Shelah, S. The consistency strength of “every stationary set reflects”. Israel J. Math. 67, 353–366 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764953

Keywords

Navigation