Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nonrenewable resources in economic, social, and environmental sustainability

  • Articles
  • Published:
Nonrenewable Resources Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the linkages among energy and mineral resources and economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Nonrenewable resources are shown to be integral components of sustainability, regardless of which paradigmatic definition of the concept is invoked. Potential measures of the degree to which nonrenewable resources contribute to or detract from sustainability are presented. We conclude that a set of such measures should be incorporated in the comprehensive framework of sustainability currently being developed by the Federal government. National scale indicators could be presented within the structure of the seven criteria from the Santiago Declaration, whereas a life cycle or materials flow approach could be used when sustainability of specific resources is at issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerman, Richard, 1998, Is mining compatible with sustainable development? A World Bank perspective: ICME Newsletter, v. 6, no. 2, p. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Industry Commission 1991a, Mining and sustainable development,in Mining and Minerals Processing in Australia, Vol. 3: Issues in detail: Canberra, Australian Govt. Publishing Service, p. 211–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Industry Commission, 1991b. Mining, minerals processing and the environment,in Mining and minerals processing in Australia, Vol. 3: Issues in detail: Canberra, Australian Govt. Publishing Service, p. 159–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auty, Richard M., 1993, Sustaining development in mineral economies: London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Richard, 1978, Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard: American Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 60, no. Feb, p. 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth, 1966, The economics of the coming spaceship earth,in Jarrett, H., ed., Environmental quality in a growing economy: Baltimore MD,, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, David J., 1996, Compiling and interpreting criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Working Paper: Portland OR, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, Alan D., Hoover, Anne P., and Tarrant, Michael A., 1998, Guidelines for conducting social assessments within a human dimensions framework (Draft): Washington, D.C., U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Ecosystem Management Coordination Staff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicot, J. B., 1989, In defense of the land ethic: Albany, State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V., 1952, Resource conservation: economics and policies: Los Angeles, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Rangeland Classification, National Research Council 1994, Rangeland health: new methods to classify, inventory, and monitor rangelands: Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Common, M. and Perrings, C., 1992, Towards an ecological economics of sustainability: Ecological Economics, v. 6, no. July, p. 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Herman E., 1986, On economics as a life science: Journal of Political Economy, v. 76, p. 392–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Gregori, Thomas R.., 1987, Resources are not; they become; an institutional theory: Journal of Economic Issues, v. 21, no. 3, p. 1241–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombeck, Michael, 1998, A gradual unfolding of a national purpose: a natural resource agenda for the 21st century: transcription of speech given to U.S. Forest Service employees on March 2.

  • Eggert, Roderick G., 1995, Sustainability and resources policy: Resources Policy, v. 21, no. 1, p. 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, A. H., 1988, Oil windfalls: blessing or curse: New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, Nicholas, 1970, The economics of production: American Economic Review, v. 60, no. 2, p. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, L. S. and Veendorp, E. C. H., 1990, Growth with exhaustible resources and a materials-balance production function: Natural Resource Modeling, v. 4, no. 1, p. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, B. D., Norton, B. G. and Costanza R., 1993, What is ecosystem health and shy should we worry about it?in Cos tanza, R., Norton, B. G., and Haskell D. B., eds., Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental Management: Washington, D.C., Island Press, p. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Richard and Horne, Amy, in press, Economic assessment of the interior Columbia basin, in Quigley, T. M. and Arbelbide, S., eds., An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-XXX: Portland, OR, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. Haynes, Richard, McCool, Stephen, Horne, Amy, and Birchfield.

  • Jim, 1996, Natural resource management and community wellbeing: Wildlife Society Bulletin, v. 24, no. 2, p. 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdren, John P., Daily, Gretchen C. and Ehrlich, Paul R., 1995, The meaning of sustainability: biogeographical aspects,in Munasinghe M. and Shearer, W., eds., Defining and measuring sustainability: the biophysical foundations: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, p. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S., 1995, Sustainability: the cross scale dimension,in Munasinghe M. and Shearer, W., eds., Defining and measuring sustainability: the biophysical foundations: Washington, D.C., The World Bank, p. 65–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, Richard B., 1997, Sustainability as opportunity: Land Economics, v. 73, no. 4, p. 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, Charles W., 1997, Dimensions of sustainability: Land Economics, v. 73, no. 4, p. 597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, William K., 1995, Is sustainability optimal? Examining the differences between economists and environmentalists: Ecological Economics, v. 15, no. 1, p. 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S., 1906, The coal question, 3rd edn.: London, MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kneese, Allen V. and Schulze, William D., 1985, Ethics and environmental economics,in Kneese, Allen V. and Sweeney, James L., eds., Handbook of natural resource and energy and economics, Vol. I: New York, North Holland, p. 191–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lélé, S. and Norgaard, R. B., 1996, Sustainability and the scientist’s burden: Conservation Biology, v. 10, no. 2, p. 354–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemons, J. F.Jr., and Berry, David, 1996, Sustainability in a materials world: Nonrenewable Resources, v. 5, no. 4, p. 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCool, Stephen, Birchfield, Jim and Allen, S., in press, Social assessment of the interior Columbia basin, in Quigley, T. M. and Arbelbide S., eds., An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-XXX: Portland, OR, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

  • McPhail, K. and Davy, A.. 1998, Integrating social concerns into private sector decision making—a review of corporate practices in the mining, oil and gas sectors: World Bank Discussion Paper No. 384, Washington, D.C., World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon. Gary, 1998, Mining and the Community: a synthesis,in McCarl, H. N., ed., Economic globalization of the mining industry: Proceedings of the Mineral Economics and Management Society Seventh Annual Professional Meeting, March 25–27, 1998, Washington, D.C., p. 187–198.

  • Meadows, Donnella, and others, 1972, The limits to growth: New York, Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, Raymond, F., 1995, The limits to growth: a reappraisal: Resources Policy, v. 21, no. 2, p. 127–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikesell, Raymond F., 1997, Explaining the resource curse, with special reference to mineral-exporting countries: Resources Policy, v. 23, no. 4, p. 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffatt, A. S., 1996, Biodiversity is a boon to ecosystems, not species: Science, v. 271, p. 1497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Norman, 1997, Consumption: challenge to sustainable development: Science, v. 276, no. 4 April, p. 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, J. G. and Barnett, H. J., 1985, Minerals and economic growth,in Vogely, W. A., ed., Economics of the mineral industries, 4th edn.: New York, AIME.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Supplies and Shortages, 1976, Government and the nation’s resources: Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office. Natural Resources Canada, 1995, Sustainable development and minerals and metals: Ottawa, Ontario, Supply and Services Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natural Resources Canada, 1998, A conceptual framework for sustainable development indicators for the minerals and metals industry (draft): Ottawa, Ontario, Minerals and Metals Sector of Natural Resources Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Bryan G.. and Toman, Michael A., 1997, Sustainability: ecological and economic perspectives: Land Economics, v. 73, no. 4, p. 553–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Talbot, 1977, Conservation and economics efficiency: Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot, Gifford, 1910, The fight for conservation: New York, Doubleday, Page and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potvin, Joseph R., 1991, Indicators of ecologically sustainable development: synthesized workshop proceedings: Ottawa, CA, Canadian Environmental Advisory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resources for Freedom, 1952, Communication from the President of the United States, Transmitting the report of the President’s Materials Policy Commission: Washington, D.C., Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, C. W., 1996, Stability and change in forest-based communities: a selected bibliography, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-366: Portland, OR, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, Earle A., Redmann, Robert E. and Crowder, Adele A., 1996, Environmental effects of mining: Delray Beach, FL, St. Lucie Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III., 1994, Conserving natural value: New York, Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. and Warner, A., 1995, Economic convergence and economic policy: Working Paper No. 5039: Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., 1985, Commodities and capabilities, Prof. P. Hennipman Lectures in Economics: Amsterdam, North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K., 1987, The standard of living: Lecture 1, concepts and critiques,in Hörne, G., ed., The standard of living: Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Deborah J. and Mitchell, John E., 1996, Sustainability: definitions, criteria and indicators: Working paper: Ft. Collins, CO, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, A., 1993, A simple test for change in community structure: Journal of Animal Biology, v. 62, p. 191–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, John E., 1990, Introduction,in Tilton, J. E., ed., World metal demand: Washington, D.C., Resources for the Future, p. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, John E.., 1996, Exhaustible resources and sustainable development: two different paradigms: Resources Policy, v. 22, no. 1/2, p. 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, Michael, 1992, The difficulty in defining sustainability: Resources, v. 106, p. 3–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toman, Michael, 1994, Economics and “sustainability”: balancing trade-offs and imperatives: Land Economics, v. 70, no. Nov, p. 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toman, Michael, Pezzy, John, and Krautkramer, Jeffrey, 1995, Neoclassical economic growth theory and “sustainability,”in Bromley, D. W., ed., Handbook of environmental economics: Oxford, Blackwell, p. 139–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., 1988, Pluralism in environmental economics: a survey of the sustainable economic development debate: Journal of Agricultural Economics, v. 39, no. 3, p. 352–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1980, Resource reserve definitions: Geological Survey Circular 831: Reston, VA, U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Geological Survey, 1998, Copper,in Mineral Commodity Summaries, Electronic Data Base: Reston, VA, U.S. Geological Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenner, Lambert N., 1992, Minerals, people, and dollars: social, economic and technological aspects of mineral resource development, R1-92-133: Missoula, MT, U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Northern Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, Our common future: New York, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, Jeffrey R. and Panayotou, Theodore, 1997or Distraction?: Science, v. 276, no. 4 April, p. 53–57.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 3825 E. Mulberry St., 80524, Ft.Collins, Colorado

    Deborah J. Shields

Authors
  1. Deborah J. Shields
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shields, D.J. Nonrenewable resources in economic, social, and environmental sustainability. Nat Resour Res 7, 251–261 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764350

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02764350

Key Words

Search

Navigation