Abstract
We answer a question posed by R. Aron, C. Finet and E. Werner, on the bilinear version of the Bishop-Phelps theorem, by exhibiting an example of a Banach spaceX such that the set of norm-attaining bilinear forms onX×X is not dense in the space of all continuous bilinear forms.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
[A-A-P] M. D. Acosta, F. J. Aguirre and R. Payá,A space by W. Gowers and new results on norm and numerical radius attaining operators, Acta Universitatis Carolinae, Mathematica et Physica33 (1992), 5–14.
[A-F-W] R. Aron, C. Finet and E. Werner,Norm attaining bilinear forms and the Radon-Nikodym property, preprint, 1994.
[B-P] E. R. Bishop and R. Phelps,A proof that every Banach space is subreflexive, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society67 (1961), 97–98.
[B] J. Bourgain,On dentability and the Bishop-Phelps property, Israel Journal of Mathematics28 (1977), 265–271.
[D-G-Z] R. Deville, G. Godefroy and V. Zizler,Smoothness and renormings in Banach spaces, Pitman Monographs and Surveys in Pure and Applied Mathematics64, Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, 1993.
[G] W. Gowers,Symmetric block bases of sequences with large average growth, Israel Journal of Mathematics69 (1990), 129–149.
[L] J. Lindenstrauss,On operators which attain their norm, Israel Journal of Mathematics1 (1963), 139–148.
[P] R. R. Phelps,The Bishop-Phelps Theorem in Complex Spaces: An Open Problem, inFunction Spaces (K. Jarosz, ed.), Lecture Notes in Pure and Applied Mathematics136, Dekker, New York, 1992, pp. 337–340.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Research partially supported by D.G.I.C.Y.T., project no. PB93-1142.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Acosta, M.D., Aguirre, F.J. & Payá, R. There is no bilinear Bishop-Phelps theorem. Israel J. Math. 93, 221–227 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761104
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761104