Skip to main content
Log in

Detection of low birth-weight new born babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Birthweight is an important indicator of child survival. Appropriate and timely care of a newborn specially if he is born with low birthweight is important but this is difficult in developing countries since most of the deliveries are conducted at home where adequate facilities to weigh a new born does not exist. This study was conducted to find out a surrogate which could efficiently be used for detecting low birthweight babies at birth when no weighing machine is around. In this study 41% of the newborn babies were found to weigh less than 2,500 gm at birth. Out of this about 52% were females. The mean chest, thigh and mid-arm circumference at birth for males were 30.89 cm, 15.06 cm and 9.27 cm respectively with standard deviations of 1.83 cm, 1.30 cm and 1.04 cm. Corresponding figures for female babies were 30.69 cm, 15.14 cm and 9.25 cm respectively with standard deviations of 2.08 cm, 1.70 cm and 1.16 cm. Correlation co-efficient between normal birthweight and the chest, thigh and mid-arm circumference were 0.867, 0.845 and 0.842 respectively. A liner regression analysis showed that a chest circumference of 30.14 cm, a thigh circumference of 14.56 cm and a mid-arm circumference of 8.90 cm corresponded well with a birthweight of 2,500 gm. On this basis sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of the chest circumference was better than the other two measurements. However, the mid-arm circumference was observed to be more reliable than the other two measurements for detecting birthweight less than 2,000 gm. A home made measuring tape has been devised on this basis to detect brithweights with cut-off values for 2,500 gm, 2,000 gm to 2,500 gm and 2,000 gm in different shades of colour for illiterate birth attendants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Macfarlane A. Altitude and birthweight: Commentary.J Pediatr 1987; 111: 842–844.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones KP. Ethnic variations in birth-weight—A study of British, Chinese and Gurkha babies.JR Army Med Crops 1987; 133: 746–774.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hort KP. Seasonal variation of birth-weight in Bangladesh.Ann Trop Pediatr 1987; 7: 66–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Roberts SB et al. Seasonal change in activity, birthweight and lactational performance in rural Gambian women.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1982; 76: 668–678.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilcox AJ et al. Birthweight and perinatal mortality: II. On weight—specific mortality.Int J Epidemiology 1983; 12: 319–325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Center for Disease Control, USA. Neonatal and infant weight specific mortality rates, New Mexico.MMWR 1983; 32: 104–106, 111.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhargava SK et al. Mid-arm and chest circumference at birth as predictors of low birthweight and neonatal mortality in the community.Br Med J 1985; 29: 1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vaqueva MVD. The relationship between arm circumference at birth and early mortality.J Trop Pediatr 1983; 29: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pratinidhi AK et al. Domicilliary care of low birthweight neonates.Indian J Pediatr 1986; 53: 87–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkins SA et al. Human milk feeding in premature infants: Protein, fat and carbohydrate balances in the first two weeks of life.J Pediatr 1981; 99: 917–924.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Siddarth R et al. Neonatal thigh circumference as an alternative indicator of low birthweight.Indian J Med Res 1986; 83: 653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh P, Bhasin MK.Anthropometry. Jullunder: Bharati Bhaldan Publisher Publication, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lukacs HA et al. Ultrasonic fetal weight estimation in multiple and singleton pregnancy.Aust Pediatr J 1984; 20: 59–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatia BD, Tyagi NK. Birthweight; relationship with other anthropometric parameters.Indian Pediatr 1987; 21: 833–838.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sauerborn R et al. Neonatal mid-upper arm circumference as a valid proxy measure for birth weight.J Trop Pediatr 1987; 33: 220–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mehta A, Jayant K. Perinatal mortality survey in India (1977–1979).J Obstet Gynaecol India 1981; 31: 183–215.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar V, Datta N. Birthweight as an indicator of health.Indian Pediatr 1984; 21: 113–118.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huque, F., Hussain, Z. Detection of low birth-weight new born babies by anthropometric measurements in Bangladesh. Indian J Pediatr 58, 223–231 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02751125

Key Words

Navigation