Skip to main content
Log in

Probabilistic interpretation, group contraction and the Galilean limit of relativistic quantum mechanics

Вероятностная интерпретация, группы свертывания и галилеев предел релятивистской квантовой механики

  • Published:
Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996)

Summary

The problem of getting the Galilei group as a limit of the Poincaré group has been solved in a rigorous manner. We use the generalized contraction introduced by Doebner and Melsheimer. Good physical reasons are given for keepingE 3 invariant in the contraction procedure, in spite of other attempts made in this direction. Group representations are contracted by using well-defined mathematical methods studied by Mickelsson and Niederle. Ill-defined contracted states do not appear in this way. An intriguing connection between localizability and contraction has energed through this work. Some physical conclusions are associated to this feature.

Riassunto

Si è risolto in maniera rigorosa il problema di ottenere il gruppo di Galilei come limite del gruppo di Poincaré. Si usa la contrazione generalizzata introdotta da Doebner e Melsheimer. Si forniscono buoni motivi fisici per mantenereE 3 invariante nella procedura di contrazione, nonostante altri tentativi fatti in questa direzione. Si contraggono altre rappresentazioni di gruppo usando metodi matematici ben definiti studiati da Mickelsson e Niederle. In questo modo non compaiono stati contratti mal definiti. Un'interessante relazione tra localizzabilità e contrazione è emersa in questo lavoro. A questo aspetto sono associate alcune conclusioni fisiche.

Резюме

Строго рещается проблема получения группы Галилея, как предела группы Пуанкаре. Мы используем обобщенное свертывание, введенное Добнером и Мелшеймером. Приводятся физические аргументы в пользу сохраненияE 3 инвариантности в процедуре свертывания. Представления группы свертываются, используя хорошо известные математические методы, исследованные Микелсоном и Нидерлом. В таком подходе не появляются неправильно определенные свернутые состояния. В работе возникает интригующая связь между локализуемостью и свертыванием. Обсуждаются некоторые физические следствия этой связи.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Bargmann:Ann. of Math.,59, 1 (1954);M. Hammermesh:Ann. of Phys.,9, 518 (1960);J. M. Lévy-Leblond:Riv. Nuovo Cimento,4, 99 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Inönü andE. P. Wigner:Nuovo Cimento,9, 705 (1952).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Bargmann andE. P. Wigner:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,34, 211 (1948);E. P. Wigner:Ann. of Math.,40, 149 (1939).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Inönü andE. P. Wigner:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,39, 510 (1953).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Saletan:Journ. Math. Phys.,2, 1 (1961).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Mickelsson andJ. Niederle:Comm. Math. Phys.,27, 167 (1972).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Newton andE. P. Wigner:Rev. Mod. Phys.,21, 400 (1949).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. S. Wightman:Rev. Mod. Phys.,34, 845 (1962).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. I. E. Segal:Duke Math. Journ.,18, 221 (1951).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. M. D. Doebner andO. Melsheimer:Nuovo Cimento,49 A, 306 (1967).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. For more details and weaker (i.e. local) definitions we refer to the work ofMickelsson andNiederle, ref. (6).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. C. R. Hagen andW. J. Hurley:Phys. Rev. Lett.,24, 1381 (1970);W. J. Hurley:Phys. Rev. D,3, 2339 (1971);J. M. Lévy-Leblond:Comm. Math. Phys.,6, 287 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. W. O. Amrein:Helv. Phys. Acta,42, 149 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

To speed up publication, the authors of this paper have agreed to not receive the proofs for correction.

Traduzione a cura della Redazione.

Переведено редакцией.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

León, J., Quirós, M. & Ramírez Mittelbrunn, J. Probabilistic interpretation, group contraction and the Galilean limit of relativistic quantum mechanics. Nuov Cim B 46, 109–120 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02748635

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02748635

Navigation