Abbreviations
- E :
-
Electric field
- E e :
-
Electric field outside the domain
- E i :
-
Electric field inside the domain
- E m :
-
Electric field for which the drift velocity equals the valley value
- E th :
-
Threshold field for Gunn instabilities
- E v :
-
Valley field, corresponding to the minimum drift velocity
- E 0 :
-
d.c. electric field
- E 1 :
-
Microwave field amplitude
- E :
-
Energy
- E g :
-
Energy gap
- f :
-
Electron distribution function
- f i :
-
Partial electron distribution function, for thei-th valley
- f (i) :
-
Electron distribution function in thei-th valley
- g(t):
-
Probability, per unit time, of a free flight of time durationt
- ℏ :
-
Planck’s constant
- I(t):
-
Transient current
- j :
-
Electric-current density
- k :
-
Electron wave vector
- k ⊥ :
-
Wave vector component perpendicular to the electric field
- K (i) :
-
Electron wave vector measured from the centre of thei-th valley
- LSA:
-
Limited space-charge accumulation mode
- m :
-
Effective electron mass
- m 0 :
-
Free-electron mass
- m 1 :
-
Electron effective mass in the central valley
- m 2 :
-
Electron effective mass in the satellite valleys
- n :
-
Majority-carrier concentration
- N :
-
Number of charges created by radiation inside the sample
- NDM:
-
Negative differential mobility
- P :
-
Scattering probability rate
- P j :
-
Scattering probability rate for thej-th mechanism
- P abs :
-
Absorbed power
- q :
-
Carrier charge
- r :
-
Random number between 0 and 1
- R :
-
Penetration depth of an ionizing radiation
- SCLC:
-
Space-charge limited current
- t :
-
Time
- t (i) :
-
Time measured from the latest scattering event of thei-th electron
- t i :
-
Time duration of thei-th free electron flight
- T R :
-
Transit time through the sample
- T ′ R :
-
Transit time augmented by trapping phenomena
- v :
-
Electron velocity
- v (i) :
-
Velocity of thei-th electron
- v d :
-
Electron drift velocity
- v D :
-
Domain velocity
- v (i)0 :
-
Velocity of thei-th electron at the beginning of the latest free flight
- v v :
-
Valley value of drift velocity
- V :
-
Voltage
- V 0 :
-
Volume
- W :
-
Sample width
- Λ :
-
Maximum collision probability
- ΔE :
-
Energy difference between central and satellite minima
- ΔQ :
-
Charge induced at the contacts
- Δx :
-
Distance travelled by a charge inside the sample
- θ :
-
Angle between electron momentum and electric field
- μ :
-
Carrier mobility
- σ :
-
Electrical low-field conductivity
- τ d :
-
Differential dielectric relaxation time
- τ D :
-
Detrapping time
- τ + :
-
Trapping time, or mean free drift time
- τ 0 :
-
Λ −1
- τ E :
-
Energy relaxation time
- ω:
-
Microwave frequency
- ω 0 :
-
Optical-phonon frequency
References
E. M. Conwell:High-field transport in semiconductors, inSol. State Phys., Suppl., Vol.9 (New York, 1967).
J. Frenkel:Phys. Rev.,54, 647 (1938).
H. Fröhlich:Proc. Roy. Soc., A188, 521 (1947).
W. Shockley:Bell Syst. Tech. Journ.,30, 990 (1951).
J. B. Gunn:Sol. State Comm.,1, 88 (1963).
J. B. Gunn:IBM Journ. Res. Dev.,8, 141 (1964).
N. Braslau, J. B. Gunn andJ. L. Staples:IBM Journ. Res. Dev.,8, 545 (1964).
J. B. Gunn:Internat. Sci. Techn., October 1965, p. 43.
H. Kroemer:Proc. IEEE,52, 1736 (1964).
B. K. Ridley andT. B. Watkins:Proc. Phys. Soc.,78, 293 (1961).
C. Hilsum:Proc. IRE,50, 185 (1962).
B. K. Ridley:Proc. Phys. Soc.,82, 954 (1963).
B. K. Ridley:Proc. Phys. Soc.,86, 637 (1965).
P. N. Butcher:Phys. Lett.,19, 546 (1965).
J. A. Copeland:Journ. Appl. Phys.,37, 3602 (1966).
J. B. Gunn:IBM Journ. Res. Dev.,10, 300 (1966).
H. Kroemer:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 27 (1966).
P. N. Butcher, W. Fawcett andC. Hilsum:Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys.,17, 841 (1966).
P. N. Butcher andW. Fawcett:Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys.,17, 1425 (1966).
D. E. McCumber andA. G. Chynoweth:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 4 (1966).
P. N. Butcher, W. Fawcett andN. R. Ogg:Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys.,18, 755 (1967).
W. Heinle:Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys.,18, 1537 (1967).
P. N. Butcher:Rep. Prog. Phys.,30, 97 (1967).
K. W. Böer andG. A. Dussel:Phys. Rev.,154, 292 (1967).
K. Kurosawa:Bell Syst. Tech. Journ.,46, 2235 (1967).
B. K. Ridley andP. H. Wisbey:Brit. Journ. Appl. Phys.,18, 761 (1967).
B. W. Knight andG. A. Peterson:Phys. Rev.,155, 393 (1967).
M. A. Lampert andR. A. Sunshine:Journ. Appl. Phys.,41, 4676 (1970).
J. E. Carroll:Hot Electron Microwave Generators (London, 1970).
D. M. Chang andJ. L. Moll:Appl. Phys. Lett.,9, 283 (1966).
J. B. Gunn andB. J. Elliott:Phys. Lett.,22, 369 (1966).
C. Hamaguchi, T. Kono andY. Inuishi:Phys. Lett.,24 A, 500 (1967).
G. A. Acket:Phys. Lett.,24 A, 200 (1967).
G. A. Acket:Phys. Lett.,25 A, 374 (1967).
G. A. Acket andJ. de Groot:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED14, 505 (1967).
J. G. Ruch andG. S. Kino:Appl. Phys. Lett.,10, 40 (1967).
S. G. Kalashnikov, V. E. Lyubchenko andN. E. Skvortsova:Sov. Phys. Semic.,1, 1206 (1967).
G. A. Acket:Phil. Res. Rept.,22, 541 (1967).
J. G. Ruch andG. S. Kino:Phys. Rev.,174, 921 (1968).
G. A. Acket:Phil. Res. Rept.,23, 317 (1968).
L. D. Cohen:Proc. IEEE,57, 1299 (1969).
B. Fay andG. S. Kino:Appl. Phys. Lett.,15, 337 (1969).
N. Braslau andP. S. Hauge:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED17, 616 (1970).
C. Canali, M. Martini, G. Ottaviani andK. R. Zanio:Phys. Lett.,33 A, 241 (1970).
A. Neukermans andG. S. Kino:Appl. Phys. Lett.,17, 102 (1970).
E. M. Bastida, G. Fabri, V. Svelto andF. Vaghi:Appl. Phys. Lett.,18, 28 (1971). See alsoAppl. Phys. Lett.,19, 122 (1971).
C. Canali, M. Martini, G. Ottaviani andK. R. Zanio:Phys. Rev.,4 B, 422 (1971).
P. M. Boers:Elect. Lett., to be published.
N. Braslau:Phys. Lett.,24 A, 531 (1967).
H. W. Thim:Elect. Lett.,2, 403 (1966).
B. W. Hakki andS. Knight:Sol. State Comm.,3, 89 (1965).
J. S. Heeks, A. D. Woode andC. P. Sandbank:Proc. IEEE,53, 554 (1965).
A. G. Foyt andA. L. McWhorter:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 79 (1966).
J. S. Heeks:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 68 (1966).
A. R. Hutson, A. Jayaraman, A. G. Chynoweth, A. S. Coriell andW. L. Feldman:Phys. Rev. Lett.,14, 639 (1965).
H. Kroemer:Proc. IEEE,53, 1246 (1965).
This hypothesis is not always necessarily verified. For example, the band structure obtained with theoretical calculations for CdTe (ref. [137]) has very flat regions rather than definite secondary valleys (see Fig. 23). However, the uncertainty assigned to these theoretical calculations is in general not less than a few tenths of eV.
W. Fawcett, A. D. Boardman andS. Swain:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,31, 1963 (1970).
J. M. Hammersley andD. C. Handscomb:Monte Carlo Methods (London, 1964).
T. Kurosawa:Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Semiconductors (Kyoto, 1966);Journ. Phys. Soc. Japan Suppl.,21, 424 (1966).
H. D. Rees:Phys. Lett.,26 A, 416 (1968).
A. D. Boardman, W. Fawcett andH. Rees:Sol. State Comm.,6, 305 (1968).
H. D. Rees:Sol. State Comm.,7, 267 (1969).
H. D. Rees:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,30, 643 (1969).
W. Fawcett andH. D. Rees:Phys. Lett.,29 A, 578 (1969).
W. Fawcett andE. G. S. Paige:Journ. Phys. C,4, 1801 (1971).
L. Bacchelli andC. Jacoboni:Sol. State Comm.,10, 71 (1972).
Random numbers between 0 and 1 are nowadays generated by library routines in all major computers. They are not actually random in the sense that given the first number of the sequence, the whole sequence is completely determined. These numbers are called pseudorandom numbers and they have the advantage of being reproducible (for program debugging and similar purposes). What is important for us is that they behave as random numbers. There is no way to prove rigorously that they do so. What can be done is to submit them to all conceivable randomness tests and to trust them as long as they do not fail. Actually the numbers generated by the routine used in most computers failed one test (ref. [144]), although this failure is of such a nature as to not affect the results of a Monte Carlo calculation of the type described here.
M. A. Omar:Phys. Rev.,171, 925 (1968).
D. Mukhopadhyay andB. R. Nag:Phys. Lett.,29 A, 648 (1969).
R. K. Kar andM. N. Mukherjee:Phys. Lett.,30 A, 355 (1969).
M. A. Omar:Phys. Rev.,186, 791 (1969).
H. Heinrich:Phys. Rev. B,3, 416 (1971).
K. Seeger:Phys. Rev.,114, 476 (1959).
J. Zucker, V. J. Fowler andE. M. Conwell:Journ. Appl. Phys.,32, 2606 (1961).
A. F. Gibson, J. W. Granville andE. G. S. Paige:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,19, 198 (1961).
M. A. C. S. Brown:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,19, 218 (1961).
C. Hamaguchi andY. Inuishi:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,27, 1511 (1966).
W. E. Spear:Proc. Phys. Soc.,78, 826 (1960).
W. E. Spear:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,21, 110 (1961).
A. Alberigi Quaranta, F. Cipolla andM. Martini:Phys. Lett.,17, 102 (1965).
J. W. Mayer: inSemiconductor Radiation Detector, edited byG. Bertolini andA. Coche, Chap. 5 (Amsterdam, 1968).
W. E. Spear:Journ. Noncryst. Sol.,1, 197 (1969).
R. G. Kepler:Phys. Rev.,119, 1226 (1960).
M. Martini, J. W. Mayer andK. R. Zanio: to be published inAppl. Sol. State Sci.
J. L. Su, Y. Nishi, J. L. Moll andA. Neukermans:Sol. State Elect.,13, 1115 (1970).
C. B. Norris andJ. F. Gibbons:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED14, 30 (1967).
C. Canali, G. Ottaviani andA. Alberigi Quaranta:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,32, 1707 (1971).
O. Meyer andH. J. Longman:Nucl. Instr. Meth.,34, 77 (1965).
D. M. Chang andJ. G. Ruch:Appl. Phys. Lett.,12, 111 (1968).
A. Neukermans andG. S. Kino:Sol. State Comm.,8, 987 (1970).
C. Canali, M. Martini, G. Ottaviani andK. R. Zanio:Sol. State Comm.,9, 163 (1971).
R. Van Heyningen:Phys. Rev.,128, 2112 (1962).
C. Cavalleri, G. Fabri, E. Gatti andV. Svelto:Nucl. Instr. Meth.,21, 177 (1963).
M. Martini andT. A. McMath:Appl. Phys. Lett.,14, 374 (1969).
A. Alberigi Quaranta, C. Canali andG. Ottaviani:Rev. Sci. Instr.,41, 1205 (1970).
G. Ottaviani, C. Canali, C. Jacoboni, A. Alberigi Quaranta andK. R. Zanio: to be published.
NDM has been seen also in Ge (ref. [95]). In the band structure of this material there are four equivalent valleys along the [111] directions, at the zone edge, and higher valleys in the centre of the zone and along the [100] directions. The equivalence of the lowest valleys can be removed by applying uniaxial pressure along particular directions. In this case a band structure analogous to that of cubic compound semiconductors, which gives rise to NDM, is obtained. Even in the absence of pressure the equivalence of the band minima can be destroyed by an applied electric field. In fact, at high values of this field the distribution functions of the electrons in the different valleys are different, corresponding to different heating, that is, different mean electron energies. This fact, combined with the effect of intervalley scattering, can originate an NDM. A more detailed treatment of this problem is beyond the aims of the present paper. We refer the interested reader to ref. [145].
J. G. Ruch andW. Fawcett:Journ. Appl. Phys.,41, 3843 (1970).
P. N. Butcher andW. Fawcett:Phys. Lett.,17, 216 (1965).
P. N. Butcher andW. Fawcett:Proc. Phys. Soc.,86, 1205 (1965).
P. N. Butcher andW. Fawcett:Phys. Lett.,21, 489 (1966).
E. M. Conwell andM. O. Vassel:Phys. Lett.,25 A, 302 (1967).
E. M. Conwell andM. O. Vassel:Phys. Rev.,166, 797 (1968).
W. Fawcett andH. D. Rees:Phys. Lett.,28 A, 731 (1969).
B. J. Elliott: quoted byW. Fawcett, A. D. Boardman andS. Swain:Journ. Phys. Chem. Sol.,31, 1963 (1970).
G. A. Acket:Phys. Lett.,29 A, 596 (1969).
G. H. Glover:Appl. Phys. Lett.,17, 472 (1970).
P. N. Butcher, W. Fawcett andC. Hilsum:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 192 (1966).
M. P. Wasse, J. Lees andG. King:Sol. State Elect.,9, 601 (1966).
J. S. Harris, J. L. Moll andG. L. Pearson:Phys. Rev. B,1, 1660 (1970).
J. W. Allen, M. Shyam, Y. S. Chen andG. L. Pearson:Appl. Phys. Lett.,7, 78 (1965).
F. P. Califano:Alta Frequenza,38, 937 (1969).
G. W. Ludwig, R. E. Halsted andM. Even:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED13, 671 (1966).
G. W. Ludwig:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED14, 547 (1967).
M. R. Oliver andA. G. Foyt:IEEE Trans. Elect. Dev., ED14, 617 (1967).
C. Jacoboni andL. Reggiani:Phys. Lett.,33 A, 333 (1970).
S. Porowski, W. Paul, J. C. McGroddy, M. I. Natan andJ. E. Smith jr.:Sol. State Comm.,7, 905 (1969).
J. E. Smith jr.,M. I. Nathan andJ. C. McGroddy:Appl. Phys. Lett.,15, 242 (1969).
J. C. McGroddy, M. R. Lorenz andT. S. Plaskett:Sol. State Comm.,7, 901 (1969).
G. Persky andD. J. Bartelink:IBM Journ. Res. Dev.,13, 607 (1969).
C. Hammar andP. Weissglas:Phys. Stat. Sol.,24, 531 (1967).
D. Matz:Phys. Rev.,168, 843 (1968).
W. Fawcett andJ. G. Ruch:Appl. Phys. Lett.,15, 368 (1969).
C. Hilsum andH. D. Rees:Elect. Lett.,6, 277 (1970).
J. A. Copeland:Proc. IEEE,54, 1479 (1966).
J. A. Copeland:Journ. Appl. Phys.,38, 3096 (1967).
C. Hilsum, J. B. Mullin, B. A. Prew, H. D. Rees andB. W. Straughan:Elect. Lett.,6, 307 (1970).
D. Colliver, C. Hilsum, B. D. Joyce, J. R. Morgan andH. D. Rees:Elect. Lett.,6, 436 (1970).
C. Hilsum: private communication.
P. M. Boers, G. A. Acket, D. H. Paxman andR. J. Tree:Elect. Lett.,7, 1 (1971).
P. M. Boers:Phys. Lett.,34 A, 329 (1971).
L. W. James, J. P. Van Dyke, F. Herman andD. M. Chang:Phys. Rev. B,1, 3998 (1970).
P. M. Boers: private communication.
G. W. Ludwig andM. Aven:Journ. Appl. Phys.,38, 5326 (1967).
M. L. Cohen andT. K. Bergstresser:Phys. Rev.,141, 789 (1966).
J. W. Allen, M. Shyam andG. L. Pearson:Appl. Phys. Lett.,9, 39 (1966).
J. E. Smith jr. andD. L. Camphausen:Journ. Appl. Phys.,42, 2064 (1971).
W. Fawcett, C. Hilsum andH. D. Rees:Sol. State Comm.,7, 1257 (1969).
H. Heinrich andW. Jantsch:Phys. Stat. Sol.,38, 225 (1970).
H. Hillbrand:Phys. Stat. Sol.,5, K 113 (1971).
C. D. Zerby:Meth. Computat. Phys.,1, 89 (1963).
J. Marsaglia:Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,61, 25 (1968).
W. Fawcett andE. G. S. Paige:Journ. Phys. C,4, 1801 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quaranta, A.A., Jacoboni, C. & Ottaviani, G. Negative differential mobility in III–V and II–VI semiconducting compounds. Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1, 445–495 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02747246
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02747246