Skip to main content
Log in

Student performance in business and economics statistics: Does exam structure matter?

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate whether exam structure really matters in an economics and business statistics course by (1) determining how well performance on multiple choice questions alone expalins overall performance on exams composed of both multiple choice questions and problems, and (2) discovering whether various student characteristics have significantly different impacts on student performance on multiple choice questions versus problems. Our findings suggest that student scores on multiple-choice portions of exams do not adequately determine overall student performance, and that some students are predisposed to do better on multiple choice or problems depending on the characteristics they possess.(JEl A22, A29)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bach, G. L., and P. Saunders. 1965. “Economic Education: Aspirations and Achievements.”American Economic Review 55: 329–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Randy E., Donald A. Rock, and Minhwei Wang. 1991. “Equivalence of Free-Response and Multiple-Choice Items”.Journal of Educational Measurement 28: 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, Brent. 1991. “Essays and Multiple Choice Tests as Predictors of College Freshman GPA”.Research in Higher Education 32: 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenkel, James L. 1981.Introductory Statistics for Management and Statistics. Boston, Mass: PWS/Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg, Randall G., and Bulent Uyar. 1997. “Correlates of Student Performance in Business and Economic Statistics”.Journal of Economics and Finance 21: 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laband, D. N., and M. J. Piette. 1995. “Does Who Teaches Principles of Economics Matter?”AEA Papers and Proceedings 85: 335–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, Nan L., and Jane S. Lopus. 1994. “The Lake Wobegon Effect in Student Self-Reported Data”.AEA Papers and Proceedings 84: 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myatt, A., and C. Waddell. 1990. “An Approach to Testing the Effectiveness of the Teaching and Learning of Economics in High School”.Journal of Economic Education 21: 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. 1993. “Do Students Go to Class? Should They?”Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 167–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Phillip, and William Walstad. 1990.The Principles of Economics Course: A Handbook for Instructors. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taub, Ross E. 1993. “On the Equivalence of the Traits Assessed by Multiple Choice and Constructed-Response Tests”. InConstruction versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement, edited by R. E. Bennett and W. C. Ward. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, Howard, and David Thissen. 1993. “Combining Mutiple-Choice and Constructed-Response Test Scores: Toward a Marxist Theory of Test Construction”.Applied Measurement in Education 6: 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walstad, William B., and William E. Becker. 1994. “Achievement Differences on Multiple-Choice and Essay Tests in Economics”.AEA Papers and Proceedings 84: 193–196.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krieg, R.G., Uyar, B. Student performance in business and economics statistics: Does exam structure matter?. J Econ Finan 25, 229–241 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744525

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02744525

Keywords

Navigation