Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early development of vegetation in restored dune plant microhabitats on a nourished beach at Ocean City, New Jersey

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topography and vegetation of restored dunes on a developed barrier island were examined after a large-scale beach nourishment project. Restoration began in 1993 using sand-trapping fences andAmmophila breviligulata Fern. plantings. Subsequent growth of dunes was favored by installing new fences and suspending beach raking to accommodate nesting birds. Plant species richness, percent cover of vegetation, and height ofA. breviligulata were sampled in 1999 on seven shore perpendicular transects in six dune microhabitats (backdune, primary crest, mid-foredune, swale, seaward-most fenced ridge, incipient dune on the backbeach).

A total of 26 plant taxa were found at all seven sites. Richness and percent cover were greatest in the backdune and crest, especially in locations that predated the 1992 nourishment. Richness was greater where fences enhanced stabilization. Fences initially compensate for time and space and allow vegetation to develop rapidly, but maintenance nourishment is required to protect against wave erosion and ensure long-term viability of habitat. An expanded environmental gradient is an option, where beach nourishment provides space for a species-rich crest and backdune to develop, while the incipient dune remains dynamic. Options where space is restricted include a dynamic, full-sized seaward section of a naturally functioning dune (truncated gradient) or a spatially restricted sampler of a wider natural dune (compressed gradient) maintained using fences. Expanded and truncated gradients may become self-sustaining and provide examples of natural cycles of change. Compressed gradients provide greater species richness and flood protection for the available space, but habitats are vulnerable to erosion, and resident views may be impaired.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. 1966.Study of the New Jersey coastal inlets and beaches: Interim reporton Great Egg Harbor Inlet to Stone Harbor. US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Anon. 1989.Great Egg Harbor Inlet and Peck Beach, New Jersey Project: General design memorandum and final supplemental environmental impact statement. US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Anon. 1999.Tide Tables 1999, East coast of North and South America. National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC.

  • Amos, W.H. & Amos, S.H. 1985.Atlantic and Gulf Coasts: Audubon Society nature guides. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andre, H.M., Noti, M.-I. & Lebrun, P. 1994. The soil fauna: the other last biotic frontier.Biodivers. Conserv. 3: 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, J., Dhillion, S. & Le Floc’h, E. 1995. On the need to select an ecosystem of reference, however imperfect: a reply to Pickett and Parker.Restoration Ecol. 3: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, C.B. & Grizzle, R. 1999. A holistic approach to sustainability based on pluralism stewardship.Environ. Ethics 21: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baye, P. 1990. Ecological history of an artificial foredune ridge on a northeastern barrier spit. In: Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D. (ed.)Proc. Canadian Symp. Coastal Sand Dunes 1990. pp. 389–403. National Research Council Canada, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, F. & Esteban, P. 1995. The management and recuperation of beaches in Catalonia. In: Healy, M.G. & Doody, J.P. (eds.)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 511–517. Samara Publishing Ltd., Cardigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, F., Clapés, J., Marqués, A. & Priestly, G.K. 1996. The recreational use of beaches and consequences for the development of new trends in management: the case of the beaches in the Metropolitan Region of Barcelona.Ocean Coastal Manage. 32: 153–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breton, F., Esteban, P. & Miralles, E. 2000. Rehabilitation of metropolitan beaches by local administrations in Catalonia: new trends in sustainable coastal mangement.J. Coastal Conserv. 6: 97–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callicott, J.B., Crowder, L.B. & Mumford, K. 1999. Current normative concepts in conservation.Conserv. Biol. 13: 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. 1997. On the value of natural relations.Environ. Ethics 19:173–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D. & Law, M.N. 1990. Seasonal patterns and controls on sediment supply to coastal foredunes, Long Point, Lake Erie. In: Nordstrom, K.F., Psuty, N.P. & Carter, R.W.G. (eds.)Coastal dunes: Form and process, pp. 177–200. John Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rooij-van der Goes, P.C.E.M., van Dijk, C., van der Putten, W.H. & Jungerius, P.D. 1997. Effects of sand movement by wind on nematodes and soil-borne fungi in coastal foredunes.J. Coastal Conserv. 3: 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doing, H. 1985. Coastal fore-dune zonation and succession in various parts of the world.Vegetatio 61: 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J.G. 1990. Dynamics and processes of barrier island vegetation.Aquat. Sci. 2: 437–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J. G. 2000 Evaluating wetlands within an urban context.Ecol. Engr. 15: 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D.A. 1990. Discovering the future, creating the past: some reflections on restoration.Restor. Manage. Notes 8: 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, R.J. & Norton, D.A. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology.Restor. Ecol. 4: 93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosier, P.E. & Cleary, W.J. 1977. Cyclic geomorphic patterns of washover on a barrier island in southeastern North Carolina.Environ. Geol. 2: 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L.L., Lopukhine, N. & Hillyard, D. 1995. Ecological restoration: a definition and comments.Restor. Ecol. 3: 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, N.L. & Nordstrom, K.F. 1999. Spatial variation in source characteristics and aeolian trapping rates on a beach. In:Coastal sediments 99, pp. 1198–1206. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E. 1999. A pragmatic re-consideration of anthropocentrism.Environ. Ethics 21: 377–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keddy, P.A. 1981. Experimental demography of a dune annual:Cakile edentula growing along an environmental gradient in Nova Scotia.J. Ecol. 69: 615–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Light, A. & Higgs, E.S. 1996. The politics of ecological restoration.Environ. Ethics 18: 227–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun, M.A. 1998. Adaptation of plants to burial in coastal sand dunes.Can. J. Bot. 76: 713–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, S.M., Griffin, C.R. & MacIvor, L.H. 1991. Recovery strategies for piping plovers in managed coastal landscapes.Coastal Manage. 19: 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minteer, B.A. & Manning, R.E. 1999. Pragmatism in environmental ethics: democracy, pluralism, and the management of nature.Environ. Ethics. 21: 191–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Casasola, P. 1986. Sand movement as a factor in the distribution of plant communities in a coastal dune system.Vegetatio 65: 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naveh, Z. 1998. Ecological and cultural landscape restoration and the cultural evolution towards a post-industrial symbiosis between human society and nature.Restor. Ecol. 6: 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, K.F. 2000.Beaches and dunes of developed coasts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, K.F., Lampe, R. & Vandemark, L.M. 2000. Reestablishing naturally functioning dunes on developed coasts.Environ. Manage. 25: 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M.A., Ambrose, R.F. & Poff, N.L. 1997. Ecological theory and community restoration ecology.Restor. Ecol. 5: 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pethick, J. 1996. The sustainable use of coasts: monitoring, modelling and management. In: Jones, P.S., Healy, M.G. & Williams, A.T. (eds.)Studies in European coastal management, pp. 83–92. Samara Publishing Ltd., Cardigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhind, P.M. & Jones, P.S. 1999. Floristics and sonservation status of sand-dune communities in Wales.J. Coastal Conserv. 5: 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, W. & Penland, S. 1988. Rapid dune changes associated with overwash processes on the deltaic coast of south Louisiana.Mar. Geol. 81: 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E.F. 1977.Wave climate at selected locations along U.S. coasts. Tech. Rept. 77-1, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Ft. Belvoir, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Maarel, E. 1979. Environmental management of coastal dunes in The Netherlands. In Jefferies, R.L. & Davy, A.J. (eds.)Ecological processes in coastal environments, pp. 543–570. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Wal, D. 1998. Effects of fetch and surface texture on aeolian sand transport on two nourished beaches.J. Arid Environ. 39: 533–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff, V. 1985. Nature management in coastal areas of Western Europe.Vegetatio 62: 523–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, P.S. & Walker, J.L. 1997. Approximating nature’s variation: selecting and using reference information in restoration ecology.Restor. Ecol. 5: 338–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nordstrom K. F..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freestone, A.L., Nordstrom, K.F. Early development of vegetation in restored dune plant microhabitats on a nourished beach at Ocean City, New Jersey. J Coast Conserv 7, 105–116 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742473

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02742473

Keywords

Navigation