Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitativein situ hybridization

  • Editorial
  • Published:
Endocrine Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Komminoth P, Merk FB, Leav I, Wolfe HJ, Roth J. Comparison of35S- and digoxigenin-labeled RNA and oligonucleotide probes for in situ hybridization. Histochemistry 98:217–228, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Trembleau A, Bloom FE. Enhanced sensitivity for light and electron microscopic in situ hybridization with multiple simultaneous non-radioactive oligodeoxynucleotide probes. J Histochem Cytochem 43:829–841, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Larsson L-I, Hougaard DM. Sensitive detection of rat gastrin mRNA by in situ hybridization with chemically biotinylated oligodeoxynucleotides: validation, quantitation and double-staining studies. J Histochem Cytochem 41:157–163, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Larsson L-I, Tingstedt J-E, Madsen OD, Serup P, Hougsard DM. The LIM-homeodomain protein Isl-1 segregates with somatostatin but not with gastrin expression during differentiation of somatostatin/gastrin precursor cells. Endocrine 3:519–524, 1995.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Baskin DG, Stahl WL. Fundamentals of quantitative autoradiography by computer densitometry for in situ hybridization with emphasis on 33P. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1767–1776, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergé-Lefranc J-L, Cartouzou G, de Micco C, Fragu P, Lissitzky S. Quantification of thyroglobulin messenger RNA by in situ hybridization in differentiated thyroid cancers. Difference between well-differentiated and moderately differentiated histologic types. Cancer 56:345–350, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nunez DJ, Davenport AP, Emson PC, Brown MJ. A quantitative “in-situ” hybridization method using computer image analysis. Biochem J 263:121–127, 1989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers WT, Schwaber JS, Lewis ME. Quantitation of cellular resolution in situ hybridization histochemistry in brain by image analysis. Neurosci Lett 82:315–320, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taneja K, Singer RH. Use of oligodeoxynucleotide probes for quantitative in situ hybridization to actin mRNA. Anal Biochem 166:389–398, 1987.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Singer RH, Lawrence JB, Villnave C. Optimazation of in situ hybridization using isotopic and non-isotopic deletion methods. Biotechniques 4:230–250, 1986.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Larsson L-I, Hougsard DM. Optimization of non-radioactive in situ hybridization: image analysis of varying pretreatment hybridization and probe labelling conditions. Histochemistry 93:347–354, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerfen CR, McGinty JF, Young WS III. Dopamine differentially regulates dynorphin, substance P, and enkephalin expression in striatal neurons: in situ hybridization histochemical analysis. J Neurosci 11:1016–1031, 1991.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCabe JT, Bolender RP. Estimation of tissue mRNAs by in situ hybridization. J Histochem Cytochem 41:1777–1783, 1993.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nederlof PM, van der Flier S, Raap AK, Tanke HJ. Quantification of inter-and intra-nuclear variation of fluorescence in situ hybridization signals. Cytometry 13:831–838, 1992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoshii A, Koji T, Ohsawa N, Nakane PK. In situ localization of ribosomal RNAs is a reliable reference for hybridizable RNA in tissue sections. J Histochem Cytochem 43:321–327, 1995.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson L-I. Immunocytochemistry. Theory and practice. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Larsson L-I, Hougaard DM. Glass slide models for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. Histochemistry 101:325–331, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Larsson L-I, Traasdahl B, Hougsard DM. Quantitative non-radioactive in situ hybridization. Model studies and studies on pituitary proopiomelanocortin cells after adrenalectomy. Histochemistry 95:209–215, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cash E, Brahic M. Quantitative in situ hybridization using initial velocity measurements. Anal Biochem 157:236–240, 1986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Butcher RG. Precise cytochemical measurement of neotetrazolium formazan by scanning and integrating microdensitometry. Histochemie 32:171–190, 1972.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Butcher RG. The measurement in tissue sections of the two formazans derived from nitroblue tetrazolium in dehydrogenase reactions. Histochem J 10:739–744, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dekken H, Arkesteijn GJA, Visser JWM, Bauman JGJ. Flow cytometric quantification of human chromosome specific repetitive RNA sequences by single and bicolor fluorescent in situ hybridization to lymphocyte interphase nuclei. Cytometry 11:153–164, 1990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trask B, van der Engh G, Pinkel D, Mullikin J, Waldman F, van Dekken H, Gray J. Fluorescence in situ hybridization to interphase cell nuclei in suspension allows flow cytometric analysis of chromosome content and microscopic analysis of nuclear organization. Hum Genet 78:251–259, 1988.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chieco P, Jonker A, Melchiorri C, Vanni G, van Noorden CJF. A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations. Histochem J 26:1–19, 1994.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Oberholzer M, Östreicher M, Christen H, Brühlmann M. Methods in quantitative image analysis. Histochem Cell Biol 105:333–355, 1996.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Russ JC. Computer-assisted microscopy. The measurement and analysis of images. New York: Plenum Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jagoe R, Steel HJ, Vucicevi V, Alexander N, van Noorden S, Wootton R, Polak JM. Observer varation in quantification of immunocytochemistry by image analysis. Histochem J 23:541–547, 1991.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mize RR. Quantitative image analysis for immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization. J Neurosci Methods 54:219–237, 1994.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Statens Serum Institut, Artillerivej 5, Building 81, DK-2300, Copenhagen S, Denmark

    Lars-Inge Larsson DSc (Professor Lars-Inge Larsson)

Authors
  1. Lars-Inge Larsson DSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lars-Inge Larsson DSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsson, LI. Quantitativein situ hybridization. Endocr Pathol 8, 3–9 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739702

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02739702

Search

Navigation