Abstract
Sex differences in behavior are most interesting when they are the result of inherent differences in the operational rules motivating behavior and not merely a reflection of differing life history experiences. American men and women exhibit a few differences in testamentary patterns of property allocation that appear to be due to inherently different rules of allocation. Even when analyses control for resources and surviving kin configurations, women distribute their property among a greater number of individual beneficiaries than do men. The most striking differences in property allocation between men and women occur within the nuclear family and reflect differences in reproductive life span and the resulting reproductive conflicts between spouses that can endure beyond death.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, R. 1979Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Auwers, L. 1978 Fathers, Sons and Wealth in Colonial Windsor, Connecticut.Journal of Family History 3:136–149.
Beckstrom, J. 1985Sociobiology and the Law: The Biology of Altruism in the Courtroom of the Future. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Ditz, T. L. 1986Property and Kinship: Inheritance in Early Connecticut, 1750–1820. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press
Dunham, A. 1963 The Method, Process and Frequency of Wealth Transmission at Death.University of Chicago Law Review 30:260.
Gagan, D. 1981Hopeful Travelers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Gilligan, Carol 1982In a Different Voice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Greven, P. J. 1970Four Generations: Population, Land and Family in Colonial Andover, Massachusetts. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Hamilton, W. D. 1964 The Genetical Evolution of Social Behaviour, Parts I and II.Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1–52.
Hrdy, S. Blaffer, and D. S. Judge 1993 Darwin and the Puzzle of Primogeniture: An Essay on Biases in Parental Investment after Death.Human Nature 4(1):1–45.
Jones, D. L. 1981Village and Seaport: Migration and Society in Eighteenth Century Massachusetts. Hanover: University Press of New England.
Judge, D. S., and S. Blaffer Hrdy 1992 Allocation of Accumulated Resources among Close Kin: Inheritance in Sacramento, California, 1890–1984.Ethology and Sociobiology 13(5–6):495–522.
Lebsock, S. 1984The Free Women of Petersburg: Status and Culture in a Southern Town 1784–1860. New York: W.W. Norton.
Rossi, A. S., and P. H. Rossi 1990Of Human Bonding: Parent-child Relations across the Life Course. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Schoen, Robert, William Urton, Karen Woodrow, and John Baj 1985 Marriage and Divorce in Twentieth Century American Cohorts.Demography 22(1):101–114.
Shammas, Carole 1994 Re-Assessing the Married Women’s Property Acts.Journal of Women’s History 6(1):9–30.
Shammas, C., M. Salmon, and M. Dahlin 1987Inheritance in America: From Colonial Times to the Present. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.
Simon R. J., W. Rav, and M. L. Fellows 1980 Public Versus Statutory Choice of Heirs: A Study of Public Attitudes about Property Distribution at Death.Social Forces 58:1265–1267.
Smith, M. S., B. J. Kish, and C. B. Crawford 1987 Inheritance of Wealth as a Human Kin Investment.Ethology and Sociobiology 8:171–182.
Sussman, M. B., J. N. Cates, and D. T. Smith 1970The Family and Inheritance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Wingard, D. L. 1984 The Sex Differential in Morbidity, Mortality and Lifestyle.Annual Review of Public Health 5:433–458.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
The initial research for this paper was funded by a grant to Sarah Blaffer Hrdy and the author from the Rockefeller Foundation Program in Changing Gender Roles.
Debra Judge is associated with the Ecology Graduate Group and the Department of Anthropology at the University of California at Davis. Her interests focus on human demography, reproductive strategies, and the ecological conditions influencing human mating and parenting strategies—especially intergenerational resource transfer.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Judge, D.S. American legacies and the variable life histories of women and men. Human Nature 6, 291–323 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734204
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02734204