Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Historical ecology of a central California estuary: 150 years of habitat change

  • Published:
Estuaries Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the historical ecology of Elkhorn Slough, a 1,200 ha tidal wetland system in central California. The goal of this study was to identify patterns of change in the extent and distribution of wetland habitats during a 150-yr period and to investigate the causes of these changes. Using a geographic information system (GIS), we interpreted historic maps, charts, and aerial photographs. We created a series of summary maps to illustrate and quantify changes in tidal flow and habitat types at six representative historical periods. With the aid of custom software tools, we performed semi-automated spatial analysis of historic aerial photographs to quantify changes in marsh cover at fixed quadrats and tidal creek width at fixed cross sections. Our multiscale analysis documents dramatic shifts in the distribution of habitat types resulting from anthropogenic modifications to the hydrology of the slough. More than half of the marshlands were diked, and more than two thirds have either degraded or been converted to other habitat types. The construction of an artificial mouth abruptly transformed the wetland system from depositional to highly erosional, enlarging channels, widening creeks, and converting marsh to intertidal mudflat or open water. Increased tidal amplitude and velocity are the likely causes. In recent decades, levee failure and intentional breaching have restored the acreage under tidal influence to nearly historic levels, but recolonization of former wetlands by salt marsh vegetation has been minimal. Degraded former marshland and unvegetated mudflat are now the dominant habitat types at Elkhorn Slough. The rate of habitat change remains high, suggesting that a new equilibrium may not be reached for many decades. This study can help tidal wetland managers identify patterns and mechanisms of habitat change and set appropriate conservation and restoration goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Adam, P. 2002. Saltmarshes in a time of change.Environmental Conservation 29:39–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J. R. L. 2000. Morphodynamics of Holocene salt marshes: A review sketch from the Atlantic and southern North Sea coasts of Europe.Quaternary Science Reviews 19:1155–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, B. F. 1987. Evidence for great Holocene earthquakes along the outer coast of Washington State.Science 236:942–944.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwater, B. F. and C. W. Hedel. 1976. Distribution of seed plants with respect to tide levels and water salinity in the natural tidal marshes of the northern San Francisco Bay estuary. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 76-389. Menlo Park, California.

  • Atwater, B. F., C. W. Hedel, and E. J. Helley. 1977. Late quaternary depositional, Holocene sea-level changes, and vertical crustal movement, southern San Francisco Bay, California. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1014. Washington, D.C.

  • Barry, J. P., M. M. Yoklavich, G. M. Caillet, D. A. Ambrose, andB. S. Antrim. 1996. Trophic ecology of the dominant fishes in Elkhorn Slough, California, 1974–1980.Estuaries 19: 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berquist, J. R. 1978. Depositional history and fault-related studies, Bolinas Lagoon, California. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78-802. Washington, D.C.

  • Boesch, D. F., M. Josselyn, A. Mehta, J. Morris, W. Nuttle, C. Simenstad, andD. Swift. 1994. Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration, and management in Louisiana.Journal of Coastal Research 20:1–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borde, A. B., R. M. Thom, S. Rumrill, andL. M. Miller. 2003. Geospatial habitat change analysis in Pacific Northwest coastal estuaries.Estuaries 26:1104–1116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, J. 2002. Climate, p. 25–28.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caffrey, J. andW. Broenkow. 2002. Hydrography, p. 29–42.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, K. L. andE. Wahl. 2000. A late Holocene record from Torrey Pines State Reserve, California.Quaternary Research 53: 341–351.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, T. A. 1994. Long term Effects of Moss Landing Harbor on the Wetlands of Elkhorn Slough. M.S. Thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, T. E. 2000. Status and trends of wetlands in the conterminous United States 1986 to 1997. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, Jr.,J. W., G. P. Shaffer, L. D. Britsch, D. J. Reed, S. R. Hawes, andD. Cahoon. 2000. Pattern and process of land loss in the Mississippi delta: A spatial and temporal analysis of wetland habitat change.Estuaries 23:425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, Jr.,J. W., F. Scarton, A. Rismondo, andD. Are. 1998. Rapid deterioration of a salt marsh in Venice Lagoon, Italy.Journal of Coastal Research 14:583–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLaune, R. D., J. A. Nyman, andW. H. Patrick. 1994. Peat collapse, ponding and wetland loss in a rapidly submerging coastal marsh.Journal of Coastal Research 10:1021–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, J. S., G. D. Williams, and J. B. Zedler. 2000. Improving the design of fish habitat mitigation projects in southern California, p. 245–251.In J. E. Keeley, M. Baer-Keeley, and C. J. Fotheringham (eds.), 2nd Interface Between Ecology and Land Development in California. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-62. Sacramento, California.

  • Dickert, T. G. andA. E. Tuttle. 1985. Cumulative impact assessment in environmental planning: A coastal wetland watershed example.Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5:37–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, S. A., W. Hildebrandt, and T. Jones. 1988. Archaeological investigations at Elkhorn Slough: CA-MNT-229, a middle period site on the central California coast.Papers in Northern California Anthropology 3.

  • Downs, L. L., R. J. Nicholls, S. P. Leatherman, andJ. Hautzenroder. 1994. Historic evolution of a marsh island: Bloodsworth Island, Maryland.Journal of Coastal Research 10:1031–1044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, G. J., N. S. Barrett, D. J. Graddon, andP. R. Last. 2000. The conservation significance of estuaries: A classification of Tasmanian estuaries using ecological, physical and demographic attributes as a case study.Biological Conservation 92: 383–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmett, R., R. Llanso, J. Newton, R. Thom, M. Hornberger, C. Morgan, C. Levings, A. Copping, andP. Fishman. 2000. Geographic signatures of North American West Coast estuaries.Estuaries 23:765–792.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabing, H. W. andR. Hamman. 1985. Steinbeck Country Narrow Gauge, 1st edition. Pruett Publishing, Boulder, Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, D. W., A. J. Reyer, P. V. Genovese, andB. D. Shearer. 1991. Coastal wetlands of the United States: An accounting of a valuable national resource. Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foxgrover, A. C., S. A. Higgins, M. K. Ingraca, B. E. Jaffe, and R. E. Smith. 2004. Deposition, erosion, and bathymetric change in south San Francisco Bay: 1858–1983. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1192. Reston, Virginia.

  • Fugro West. 1995. North Monterey County Hydrogeologic Study, Volume 1. Water Resources, Prepared for Monterey County Water Resources Agency. Fugro West, Inc., Monterey, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goals Project. 1999. Baylands Ecosystem Habitat Goals. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, California and San Francisco Regional Water Quality Control Board, Oakland, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, B. L. 1996. Monterey Bay Area: Natural History and Cultural Imprints, 3rd edition. Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J., H. C. Bryant, andT. I. Storer. 1918. The Game Birds of California, 1st edition. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossinger, R. 2000. Documenting local landscape change: The San Francisco Bay area historical ecology project, p. 425–441.In D. Egan and E. A. Howell (eds.), The Historical Ecology Handbook, 1st edition. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, E. K., V. Gornitz, A. Kolker, F. Mushacke, andD. Fallon. 2002. Anthropogenic and climate-change impacts on salt marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City.Wetlands 22:71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. T. andS. Connors. 2002. Bird and mammals, p. 187–214.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, I. 1931. The Marsh and Aquatic Plants of the Pajaro Valley. M.A. Thesis, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, M. I. 1991. Paleoenvironment of Elkhorn Slough and Surrounding Wetland Habitats: A Geological Study Using an Ecological Approach. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. R. 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, 2nd edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. L. 2002. Archaeology and prehistory, p. 53–91.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. L. andD. A. Jones. 1992. Elkhorn Slough revisited: Reassessing the chronology of CA-MNT-229.Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 10:163–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. S., R. E. Grace, andJ. C. Stevenson. 1988. Marsh loss in Nanticoke estuary, Chesapeake Bay.Geographical Review 78:205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennish, M. J. 2001. Coastal salt marsh systems in the U.S.: A review of anthropogenic impacts.Journal of Coastal Research 17: 731–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennish, M. J. 2002. Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries.Environmental Conservation 29:78–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, J. M. 1981. Estero Grande: Cultural Ecology and the Evolution of a Coastal Ecosystem. M.S. Thesis, University of California. Davis, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, E. J. 2001. Coastal wetlands-emergent marshes, p. 483–486.In W. S. Leet, C. M. Dewees, R. Klingbeil, and E. J. Larson (eds.), California’s Living Marine Resources: A Status Report. California and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, C. 2000. The Biology of Soft Shores and Estuaries, 1st edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. B. 1999. Marsh Loss in Elkhorn Slough, California: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Impact on Shorebirds. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, K. 1988. Coastal salt marsh, p. 262–294.In M. G. Barbour and J. Major (eds.), Terrestrial Vegetation of California, 2nd edition. California Native Plant Society Special Publication No. 9. Sacramento, California.

  • MacGinitie, G. E. 1935. Ecological aspects of a California marine estuary.American Midland Naturalist 16:629–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malzone, C. M. 1999. Tidal Scour and its Relation to Erosion and Sediment Transport in Elkhorn Slough. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. L., F. E. Smeins, andJ. W. Webb. 1996. Mid-Texas coastal marsh change (1939–1991) as influenced by lesser snow goose herbivory.Journal of Coastal Research 12:462–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, L. J. 2000. Shoreline mapping techniques.Journal of Coastal Research 16:111–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1990. Estuaries of the United States: Vital Statistics of a National Resource Base. Office of Oceanography and Marine Assessment, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, F. H., J. E. Cloern, S. N. Luoma, andD. H. Peterson. 1986. The modification of an estuary.Science 231:567–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, T. M. andN. T. Hall. 1996. Historical changes in the tidal marsh of tomales Bay and Olema Creek, Marin County, California.Journal of Coastal Research 12:90–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. P. 1931. Estuary tidal prisms related to entrance areas.Civil Engineering 1:738–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, M., S. Crooks, andP. B. Williams. 2003. Will restored tidal marshes be sustainable?San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science 1:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, W. H. andR. D. DeLaune. 1990. Subsidence, accretion, and sea level rise in south San Francisco Bay marshes.Limnology and Oceanography 35:1389–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. D. 1986. Coastal submergence and marsh fringe erosion.Journal of Coastal Research 2:427–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, E. F., J. Calvin, J. W. Hedgpeth, andD. W. Phillips. 1985. Between Pacific Tides, 5th edition. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scavia, D., J. C. Field, D. F. Boesch, R. W. Buddemeier, V. Burkett, D. R. Cayan, M. Fogarty, M. A. Harwell, R. W. Howarth, C. Mason, D. J. Reed, T. C. Royer, A. H. Sallenger, andJ. G. Titus. 2002. Climate change impacts on U.S. coastal and marine ecosystems.Estuaries 25:149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, D. L., H. T. Mullins, andD. F. Belknap. 1986. Holocene geologic history of a transform margin estuary: Elkhorn Slough, central California.Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 22:285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silberstein, M., C. Zabin, L. Newberry, D. Mountjoy, L. Strnad, andJ. Caffrey. 2002. History of land use, p. 93–116.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. A. andF. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 3rd edition. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steere, J. T. andN. Schaefer. 2001. Restoring the Estuary: Implementation Strategy of the San Francisco Bay Joint Venture. San Francisco Bay Joint Venture, Oakland, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, J. C., M. S. Kearney, andE. C. Pendleton. 1985. Sedimentation and erosion in a Chesapeake Bay brackish marsh system.Marine Geology 67:213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam, T. W., C. D. Allen, andJ. L. Betancourt. 1999. Applied historical ecology: Using the past to manage for the future.Ecological Applications 9:1189–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. E. 1997. Wetland loss in the northern Gulf of Mexico: Multiple working hypotheses.Estuaries 20:1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Planck, W. E. 1958. Salt in California. California Division of Mines Bulletin 175. California Division of Mines, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasson, K., J. Nybakken, R. Kvitek, C. Braby, andM. Silberstein. 2002. Invertebrates, p. 135–161.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Eldhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. D. andJ. B. Zedler. 1999. Fish assemblage composition in constructed and natural tidal marshes of San Diego Bay: Relative influence of channel morphology and restoration history.Estuaries 22:702–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B. andP. M. Faber. 2001. Salt marsh restoration experience in the San Francisco Bay estuary.Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue 27:203–211.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B. andM. K. Orr. 2002. Physical evolution of restored breached levee salt marshes in the San Francisco Bay estuary.Restoration Ecology 10:527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. B., M. K. Orr, andN. J. Garrity. 2002. Hydraulic geometry: A geomorphic design tool for tidal marsh channel evolution in wetland restoration projects.Restoration Ecology 10:577–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, C. R. 1989. Observations of Tides and Tidal Currents in Elkhorn Slough. M.S. Thesis, San Jose State University Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoklavich, M. M., G. M. Caillet, J. P. Barry, D. A. Ambrose, andB. S. Antrim. 1991. Temporal and spatial patterns in abundance and diversity of fish assemblages in Elkhorn Slough, California.Estuaries 14:465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoklavich, M. M., G. M. Caillet, D. S. Oxman, J. P. Barry, andD. C. Lindquist. 2002. Fishes, p. 163–185.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation, Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1996a. Coastal mitigation in southern California: The need for a regional restoration strategy.Ecological Applications 6:84–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1996b. Tidal wetland restoration: A scientific perspective and southern California focus. California Sea Grant College System Publication T-038, University of California, La Jolla, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. andJ. C. Callaway. 1999. Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories?.Restoration Ecology 7:69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, R. C. andJ. Caffrey. 2002. Primary producers, p. 117–133.In J. Caffrey, M. Brown, W. B. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.), Changes in a California Estuary: A Profile of Elkhorn Slough. Elkhorn Slough Foundation. Moss Landing, California.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve, 1700 Elkhorn Road, 95076, Watsonville, California

    Eric Van Dyke & Kerstin Wasson

Authors
  1. Eric Van Dyke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kerstin Wasson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Van Dyke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Dyke, E., Wasson, K. Historical ecology of a central California estuary: 150 years of habitat change. Estuaries 28, 173–189 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732853

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02732853

Keywords

Search

Navigation