Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Benefits of being biased!

  • Research Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akashi H. 1994 Synonymous codon usage inDrosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy.Genetics 136, 927–935.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H. 1995 Inferring weak selection from patterns of polymorphism and divergence at 'silent' sites inDrosophila DNA.Genetics 139, 1067–1076.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Akashi H. 1996 Molecular evolution betweenDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans: reduced codon bias, faster rates of amino acid substitution, and larger proteins inD. melanogaster.Genetics 144, 1297–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer M. 1991 The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage.Genetics 129, 897–907.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini D. B. 2004 Experimental reduction of codon bias in theDrosophila alcohol dehydrogenase gene results in decreased ethanol tolerance of adult flies.J. Evol. Biol. 17, 779–785.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carlini, D. B. and Stephan W. 2003In vivo introduction of unpreferred synonymous codons into theDrosophila Adh gene results in reduced levels of ADH protein.Genetics 163, 239–243.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duret L. and Mouchiroud D. 1999 Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage inCaenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4482–4487.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • King J. L. and Jukes T. H. 1969 Non-Darwinian evolution.Science 164, 788–798.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kurland C. G. 1987 Strategies for efficiency and accuracy in gene expression. 1. The major codon preference: a growth optimization strategy.Trends Biochem. Sci. 12, 126–128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McVean G. A. T. and Vieira J. 2001 Inferring parameters of muta tion, selection, and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution inDrosophila.Genetics 157, 245–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moriyama E. N. and Powell J. R. 1997 Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance inDrosophila.J. Mol. Evol. 45, 514–523.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura Y., Gojobori, T. and Ikemura, T. 2000 Codon usage tabu lated from the international DNA sequence database: status for the year 2000.Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 292.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powell J. R. and Moriyama E. N. 1997 Evolution of codon usage bias inDrosophila.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 7784–7790.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Precup J. and Parker J. 1987 Missense misreading of asparagine codons as a function of codon identity and context.J. Biol. Chem. 262, 11351–11356.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sörensen M. A., Kurland C. G. and Pedersen S. 1989 Codon usage determines translation rate inEscherichia coli.J. Mol. Biol. 207, 365–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Evolutionary Biology Laboratory, Evolutionary & Organismal Biology Unit, Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Jakkur, P.O. Box 6436, 560 064, Bangalore, India

    Sutirth Dey

Authors
  1. Sutirth Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sutirth Dey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dey, S. Benefits of being biased!. J Genet 83, 113–115 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729889

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729889

Keywords

Search

Navigation