Abstract
The debate over the nature and scope of marketing is far from settled, but the desire for change among marketers is apparent. It is urgent that marketers determine what the scope of their field should become as a necessary first step in developing an adequate definition. The effort so far has been somewhat haphazard with a variety of authors-extolling the virtues of their viewpoint. This article represents an attempt to add order to the search for a useful scope for marketing. To achieve this purpose, four norms are developed which seem suitable for testing the scope and definition of marketing. They include the level of abstraction norm, the norm of correspondence, the pragmatic norm, and the norm of simplicity. These four norms are first used to test two extreme positions and then to test a third compromise definition of marketing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bagozzi, Richard P., “Marketing as Exchange,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (October 1975), pp. 32–39.
Blau, Peter M.,Exchange and Power in Social Life, (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964).
Ekeh, Peter P.,Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974), Chapter 3
Homans, George C.,Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, rev. ed. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974).
Kotler, Philip, “A Generic Concept of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing 35 (July 1971), pp. 3–12.
Levi-Strauss, Claude,The Elementary Structures of Kinship, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).
Luck, David J., “Broadening the Concept of Marketing-Too Far,”Journal of Marketing, 33 (July 1969), pp. 53–55.
“Social Marketing: Confusion Compounded,”Journal of Marketing, 38 (October 1974), pp. 70–72.
Nickels, William G., “Conceptual Conflicts in Marketing,”Journal of Economics and Business, 26 (Winter 1974), pp. 140–143.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Robin, D.P. A useful scope for marketing. JAMS 6, 228–238 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729788
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729788