Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

The debate over the nature and scope of marketing is far from settled, but the desire for change among marketers is apparent. It is urgent that marketers determine what the scope of their field should become as a necessary first step in developing an adequate definition. The effort so far has been somewhat haphazard with a variety of authors-extolling the virtues of their viewpoint. This article represents an attempt to add order to the search for a useful scope for marketing. To achieve this purpose, four norms are developed which seem suitable for testing the scope and definition of marketing. They include the level of abstraction norm, the norm of correspondence, the pragmatic norm, and the norm of simplicity. These four norms are first used to test two extreme positions and then to test a third compromise definition of marketing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagozzi, Richard P., “Marketing as Exchange,”Journal of Marketing, 39 (October 1975), pp. 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M.,Exchange and Power in Social Life, (New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekeh, Peter P.,Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions, (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974), Chapter 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, George C.,Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms, rev. ed. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, Philip, “A Generic Concept of Marketing,”Journal of Marketing 35 (July 1971), pp. 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Strauss, Claude,The Elementary Structures of Kinship, (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Luck, David J., “Broadening the Concept of Marketing-Too Far,”Journal of Marketing, 33 (July 1969), pp. 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • “Social Marketing: Confusion Compounded,”Journal of Marketing, 38 (October 1974), pp. 70–72.

  • Nickels, William G., “Conceptual Conflicts in Marketing,”Journal of Economics and Business, 26 (Winter 1974), pp. 140–143.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robin, D.P. A useful scope for marketing. JAMS 6, 228–238 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729788

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02729788

Keywords

Navigation