Skip to main content
Log in

An empirical investigation of a general theory of marketing ethics

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a scenario technique, the study tests a core portion of Hunt and Vitell’s (1986) general theory of marketing ethics in the context of a marketing research ethical dilemma. The results provide substantial support for the relationships proposed in this part of the model. Two additional hypotheses are confirmed. First, ethical judgments to resolve the dilemma are found to be jointly determined by deontological and teleological evaluations. Second, the relationship between ethical judgment and intention to adopt an ethical alternative is attenuated when its implementation does not result in a preferred consequence. Research limitations and recommendations are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Marketing Association, New York Chapter. 1986.Green Book: International Directory of Marketing Research Houses and Services, 24th Ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer, Michael, Clarence Gratto, Jerry Gravander, and Mark Tuttle. 1987. “A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision Making.”Journal of Business Ethics 6 (May): 265–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrol, A. B. 1975. “Managerial Ethics: A Post-Watergate View.”Business Horizons 18 (July): 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, Gerald F., Dennis J. Moberg, and Manuel Velasquez. 1981. “The Ethics of Organizational Politics.”Academy of Management Review 6 (July): 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chonko, Lawrence B. and Shelby D. Hunt. 1985. “Ethics and Marketing Management: An Empirical Examination.”Journal of Business Research 13 (August): 339–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, William R. and Matthew Goldstein. 1984.Multivariate Analysis Methods and Applications. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, G. W. 1967. “Personal Value Systems of American Managers.”Academy of Management Journal 1 (March): 53–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, John E. 1985. “A Suggested Approach to Linking Decision Styles with Business Ethics.”Journal of Business Ethics 4 (April): 137–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, William. 1963.Ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, David J. and Helmut Becker. 1983. “Ethical Behavior of Marketing Managers.”Journal of Business Ethics 2 (November): 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1984. “Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy—An Empirical Investigation.”Academy of Management Journal 27 (March): 166–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensel, Paul J. and Alan J. Dubinsky. 1986. “Ethical Dilemmas in Marketing: A Rationale.”Journal of Business Ethics 5 (February): 63–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. and Scott Vitell. 1986. “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing 6 (Spring): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D., Lawrence B. Chonko, and James B. Wilcox. 1984. “Ethical Problems of Marketing Researchers.”Journal of Marketing Research 21 (August): 309–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, John E. and Mark A. Hamilton. 1986.Path: A Program in Basic. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University.

  • Kohlberg, Lawrence. 1981.The Meaning and Measurement of Moral Development. Worcester, MA: Clark University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, Gene R. 1983. “Framework for Analyzing Marketing Ethics.”Journal of Macromarketing 3 (Spring): 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak, Gene R., Robert F. Lusch, and Patrick E. Murphy. 1979. “Social Marketing: Its Ethical Dimension.”Journal of Marketing 43 (Spring): 29–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Ham-Han. 1981. “Ethical Beliefs in Marketing Management: A Cross-Cultural Study.”European Journal of Marketing (UK) 15(1): 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick and Gene R. Laczniak. 1981. “Marketing Ethics: A Review with Implications for Managers, Educators, and Researchers.” In:Review of Marketing, B. Enis and K. Roering, eds. Chicago: American Marketing Association: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, John, William Wasserman, and Michael Kutner 1989.Applied Linear Regression Models, 2nd Ed. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. and William O. Bearden. 1985. “Crossover Effects in the Theory of Reasoned Action: A Moderating Influence Attempt.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (December): 324–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robin, Donald P. and Eric Reidenbach. 1987. “Social Responsibility, Ethics, and Marketing Strategy: Closing the Gap Between Concept and Application.”Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, R. 1970.Obligation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute. 1982.SAS User’s Guide: Statistics, 1982 Ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Kenneth C. and Cynthia K. Holm. 1982. “Deceptive Practices in Marketing Research: The Consumer’s Viewpoint.”California Management Review 24 (Spring): 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS-X, Inc. 1988.SPSS-X User’s Guide, 3rd Ed. Chicago: SPSS-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, Linda K. 1986. “Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person—Situation Interactionist Model.”Academy of Management Review 11 (3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayo, M.A., Marks, L.J. An empirical investigation of a general theory of marketing ethics. JAMS 18, 163–171 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726432

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726432

Keywords

Navigation