Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualization and operationalization of retail store image: A case of rival middle-level theories

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the case that inconsistencies between retail store image conceptualization and operationalization signal a critical separation between theory and measurement within the paradigm. The authors attribute the separation to the influence of two rival, middle-level information processing theories. The first, piecemeal-based processing theory, has historically dominated retail store image operationalization and measurement within the area. The authors argue, however, that the time has come for a new information processing theory—category-based information processing—to challenge piecemeal processing as the positive heuristic within the store image paradigm. The advantages of adopting category-based processing over piecemeal processing are discussed both from a positive and normative perspective. Recommendations for managers and propositions for future research are offered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arons, Leon. 1961. “Does Television Viewing Influence Store Image and Shopping Frequency?”,Journal of Retailing 37 (Fall): 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, Leonard L. 1969. “The Components of Department Store Image: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis”,Journal of Retailing 45 (Spring): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Box, George E.P. 1976. “Science and Statistics”,Journal of the American Statistical Association 71 (December): 791–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, Rohit. 1983. “Paradigms Lost: On Theory and Method In Research in Marketing”,Journal of Marketing 47 (Fall): 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, Ernest 1985. “What’s In An Image”.Journal of Consumer Marketing 2 (Winter): 75–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, Peter and Ian Fenwick. 1974–1975. “How Store Image Affects Shopping Habits in Grocery Chains”,Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feick, Lawrence F. and Linda L. Price. 1987. “The Market Maven: A Diffuser of Marketplace Information”.Journal of Marketing 51 (January): 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T. and Patricia W. Linville. 1980. “What Does the Concept Schema Buy Us?”.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6 (December): 543–557. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence J. Erlbaum, 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T. and P.W. Linville. 1980. “What Does the Term Schema Buy Us?”Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6 (December): 543–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T. and Mark A. Pavelchak. 1984. “Category-Based Versus Piecemeal-Based Affective Responses: Developments in Schema-Triggered Affect.” InThe Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, Susan T. and Shelley E. Taylor. 1984.Social Cognition. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, Arthur, Sallie E. Gordon, and John D. Sawyer. 1979. “Recognition Memory for Typical and Atypical Actions in Scripted Activities: Tests of a Script Pointer and Tag Hypothesis.”Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18 (June): 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graesser, Arthur, Stanley B. Woll, Daniel J. Kowalski, and Donald A. Smith. 1980. “Memory for Typical and Atypical Actions in Scripted Activities.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 6 (September): 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Robert A. and Terry Deutscher. 1977–1978. “An Empirical Investigation of Attribute Importance in Retail Store Selection.”Journal of Retailing 53 (Winter): 59–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Del I., Gerald Albaum, and Roger Best. 1974. “Stapel Scale or Semantic Differential in Marketing Research?”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (August): 318–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Del I., Gerald Albaum, and Roger Best. 1975–1976. “Reliability of Retail Store Images as Measured by the Stapel Scale.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Winter): 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Elizabeth C., Barnett Greenberg, and Dan H. Robertson. 1978. “The Intermarket Reliability of Retail Image Research: An Empirical Examination.”Journal of Retailing 54 (Spring): 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Arun K. and Michael Etgar. 1976–1977. “Measuring Store Image Through Multidimensional Scaling of Free Response Data.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Winter): 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Don L., Richard M. Durand, and Robert A. Dreves. 1976. “The Use of a Multi-Attribute Attitude Model in a Store Image Study.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Summer): 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, John H. and Leonard L. Berry. 1968. “A Behavioral Conception of Retail Image.”Journal of Marketing 32 (October): 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessig, V. Parker. 1973. “Consumer Store Images and Store Loyalties.”Journal of Marketing 37 (October): 72–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, Donald R. and Scot Burton. 1989. “The Relationship Between Perceived and Objective Price-Quality.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November): 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindquist, Jay D. 1974–1975. “Meaning of Image.”Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, Richard J. and James R. Bettman. 1977. “Multiattribute Models in Marketing: A Bicentennial Review.” InConsumer and Industrial Buying Behavior. Eds. Arch G. Woodside, Jagdish N. Sheth, and Peter D. Bennett. New York: Elsevier-North Holland, 137–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Naresh K. 1983. “A Threshold Model of Store Choice.”Journal of Retailing 59 (Summer): 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, Burton H. 1972. “Image Variation and the Multi-Unit Retail Establishment.”Journal of Retailing 48 (Summer): 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Ronald B. 1976. “Operationalizing the Concept of Store Image.”Journal of Retailing 52 (Fall): 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, Pierre. 1958. “The Personality of the Retail Store.”Harvard Business Review 36 (January–February): 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Eleanor G. 1974–1975. “Practical Applications of Recent Retail Image Research.”Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazursky, David and Jacob Jacoby. 1986. “Exploring the Development of Store Images.”Journal of Retailing 62 (Summer): 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, G.H.G. and J.N. Fry. 1974–75. “Combining Two Methods of Image Measurement.”Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menezes, Dennis and Norbert F. Elbert. 1979. “Alternative Semantic Scaling Formats for Measuring Store Image: An Evaluation.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, Chris S. and Francis T. Durso. 1984. “Effect of Schema-Incongruent Information on Memory for Stereotypical Attributes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47 (July): 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxenfeldt, Alfred R. 1974–1975. “Developing a Favorable Price-Quality Image.”Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Bernadette and Reid Hastie. 1987. “Perception of Variability in Category Development: Instance-Versus Abstraction-Based Stereotypes.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53 (October): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessemier, Edgar A. 1980. “Store Image and Positioning.”Journal of Retailing 56 (Spring): 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, Robert A. and William R. Wilson. 1985. “Perceived Risk and Price Reliance Schema as Price-Perceived Quality Mediators.Perceived Quality: How Consumers View Stores and Merchandise. Eds. Jacob Jacoby and Jerry C. Olson. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath, 247–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rich, Stuart U. and Bernard D. Portis. 1964. “The Imageries of Department Stores.”Journal of Marketing 28 (April): 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Lee, Mark R. Lepper, and M. Hubbard. 1975. “Perseverance in Self Perception and Social Perception: Bias Attributional Processes in the Debriefing Paradigm.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32 (November): 880–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, David E. and Andrew Ortony. 1977. “The Representation of Knowledge in Memory.” InSchooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Eds. Richard C. Anderson, Rand J. Spiro, and William E. Montague. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 99–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, Michael J. and E. H. Bonfield. 1975. “The Fishbein Extended Model and Consumer Behavior.”Journal of Consumer Research 2 (September): 118–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Daniel F. and Richard C. Sherman. 1984. “Memory for Persuasive Messages: Test of a Schema-Copy-Plus-Tag Model.”Journal of personality and Social Psychology 47 (July): 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, Sallie W. 1974–1975. “Discovering and Improving Store Image.”Journal of Retailing 50 (Winter): 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shank, Roger C. and Robert P. Abelson. 1977.Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Donald and Arthur C. Graesser. 1981. “Memory for Actions in Scripted Activities as a Function of Typicality, Retention Interval, and Retrieval Task.”Memory and Cognition 9 (November): 550–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srull, Thomas K. 1981. “Person Memory: Some Tests of Associative Storage and Retrieval Models.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 7 (November): 440–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srull, Thomas K., Meryl Lichtenstein, and Myron Rothbart. 1985. “Associative Storage and Retrieval Processes in Person Memory.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11 (April): 316–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Mita. 1985. “Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Processes Mediating Consumer Judgments.”Journal of Consumer Research 12 (June): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, Mita and James R. Bettman. 1989. “The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights From Schema Research.”Journal of Marketing Research 26 (November): 454–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Shelley E. and Jennifer Crocker. 1981. “Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing.” InSocial Cognition: The Ontario Symposium, Volume 1. Eds. E. Tory Higgins, C. Peter Herman, and Mark P. Zanna. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 89–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Shelley E., Jennifer Crocker, and Joseph D’Agostino. 1978. “Schematic Bases of Social Problem-Solving.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4 (July): 447–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndyke, Perry W. and Barbara Hayes-Roth. 1979. “The Use of Schemata in the Acquisition and Transfer of Knowledge.”Cognitive Psychology 11 (January): 82–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkie, William L. and Edgar Pessemier. 1973. “Issues in Marketing’s Use of Multiattribute Models.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (November): 428–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, Robert S. and Sallie E. Gordon. 1982. “The Recall of Information About Persons and Groups.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18 (March): 128–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, Mary R. and Linda L. Golden. 1988. “Impressions of Retail Stores: A Content Analysis of Consumer Images.”Journal of Retailing 64 (Fall): 265–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keaveney, S.M., Hunt, K.A. Conceptualization and operationalization of retail store image: A case of rival middle-level theories. JAMS 20, 165–175 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723456

Keywords

Navigation