Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental outcomes of newborn encephalopathy in the term infant

  • Symposium on Neurodevelopmental Disorders-II
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Newborn ecephalopathy is a clinically defined condition of abnormal neurological behaviours in the newborn period. Though most cases have their origin in the preconceptional and antepartum period, newborn encephalopathy represents a crucial link between intrapartum events and permanent neurological problems in the child. The birth prevalence of newborn encephalopathy ranges from 1.8 to 7.7 per 1000 term live births according to the definition used and the population to which it is applied. Few studies have investigated the outcomes of newborn encephalopathy other than for cases solely attributed to intrapartum hypoxia. These adverse outcomes range from death to cerebral palsy, intellectual disability, and less severe neurological disabilities such as learning and behavioural problems. Outcomes following newborn encephalopathy may vary from country to country with 9.1% of affected babies dying in the newborn period in Western Australia and 10.1% manifesting cerebral palsy by the age of two. These compare to a case fatality of 30.5% in Kathmandu and a cerebral palsy rate of 14.5% by one year of age. The study by Robertsonet al which followed children with hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy found an incidence of impairment of 16% among survivors assessed at 8 years with 42% requiring school resource room help or special classes. This review emphasises the great need for comprehensive clinical and educational assessment as these infants approach school entry to enable appropriate educational provisions to be made.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nelson KB, Leviton A. How much of neonatal encephalopathy is due to birth asphyxia?Am J Dis Child 1991; 145: 1325–1331.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JMet.al. Antepartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case control study.BMJ 1998; 317: 1549–1553.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Badawi N, Kurinczuk JJ, Keogh JMet al. Intrapartum risk factors for newborn encephalopathy: the Western Australian case control study.BMJ 1998; 317: 1554–1558.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Robertson CMT, Finer NN, Grace MGA. School performance of survivors of neonatal encephalopathy associated with birth asphyxia at term.J Pediatr 1989; 114: 753–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D Henderson-Smart. Throwing the baby out with the fetal monitoring? Obstetric care, birth asphyxia and brain damage.MJA 1991; 154: 576–578.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Neonatal signs as predictors of cerebral palsy.Pediatrics 1979; 64: 225–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellenberg JH, Nelson KB. Cluster of perinatal events identifying infants at high risk for death or disability.J Pediatr 1988; 113: 546–552.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall DMB. Intrapartum events and cerebral palsy.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 745–747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yudkin PL, Johnson A, Clover LM, Murphy KW. Clustering of perinatal markers of birth asphyxia and outcome at age 5 years.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 774–784.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levene MI, Sands C, Grindulis H, Moore JR. Comparison of two methods of predicting outcome in perinatal asphyxia.Lancet 1986; 67–69.

  11. Handley-Derry M, Low JA, Burke SOet al. Intrapartum fetal asphyxia & the occurrence of minor deficits in 4 to 8 year-old children.Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 39: 508–514.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Temple CM, Dennis J, Carney R, Sharich J. Neonatal seizures: Long-term outcome and cognitive development among ‘normal’ survivors.Dev Med Child Neurol 1995; 37 109–118.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Scher Ms, Aso K, Beggarly MEet al. Electrographic seizures in preterm and full-term neonates: clinical, associated brain lesions, and risk for neurologic sequelae.Pediatrics 1993; 91 : 128–134.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Legido A, Clancy RR, Bergman PH. Neurologic outcome after electroencephalopathy in Kathmandu, Nepal.Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 689–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ellis ME, Manandhar N, Shrestha PSet al. Outcome at one yar of neonatal encephalopathy in Kathmandu, Nepal.Dev Med Child Neurol 1999; 41: 689–695.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Finer NN, Robertson CM, Richards RTet al. Hypoxic-Ischemic encephalopathy in term neonates; Perinatal factors and outcome.J Pediatr 1981; 98: 112–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ergander U, Eriksson M, Zetterstrom R. Severe Neonatal asphyxia-Incidence and prediction of outcome in the Stockholm area.Acta Paediatr 1983; 72: 321–325.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Levene ML, Kornberg J, Williams, TCH. The incidence and severity of postasphyxial encephalopathy in full-term infants.Early Hum Develop 1985; 11: 21–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomberg E, Thiringer K, Odeback Aet al. Birth asphyxia: incidence, Clinical course and outcome in a Swedish population.Acta Paediatr 1995; 84 : 927–932.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Adamson SJ, Alessandri LM, Badawi Net al. Predictors of neonatal encephalopathy in full term infants.BMJ 1995; 311: 598–602.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maclennan A for the International Cerebral Palsy Task Force. A template for defining a causal relationship between acute intrapartum events and cerebral palsy: International consensus statement.BMJ 1995; 311: 598–602.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopahy following fetal distress.Arch Neurol 1976; 33: 696–705.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Niswander KR, Gordon M.The Collaborative Perinatal Study of the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke: The Women and Their Pregnancies. Washington : US Department of Health Education and Welfare, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nelson KB, Ellenberg JH. Antecedents of cerebral palsy, 1. Univariate analysis of risks.Am J Dis Child 1985; 139: 1031–1038.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown A, Purvis RJ, Forfar JOet al. Neurological aspects of perinatal asphyxia.Dev Med Child Neurol 1974; 6: 567–580.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Peliowski A, Finer NN. Birth asphyxia in the term infants. In Sinclair JC, Bracken MB, eds.Effective Care of the Newborn Infant. Oxford, Oxford University Press 1992; 249–279.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadia Badawi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Badawi, N., Keogh, J.M., Dixon, G. et al. Developmental outcomes of newborn encephalopathy in the term infant. Indian J Pediatr 68, 527–530 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723247

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723247

Key words

Navigation