Skip to main content
Log in

A multivariate analysis of responses to dissatisfaction

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although consumer dissatisfaction is ubiquitous in the marketplace, empirical studies of dissatisfaction have been narrow in focus. This is especially true for studies of responses to dissatisfaction, for these investigations tend to ignore all dissatisfaction responses except complaint behavior. The study reported here replicates and extends an earlier investigation by concurrently examining three dissatisfaction responses—complaints, word of mouth, and brand switching intentions. Three sets of variables were examined in relationship to these responses: characteristics of the product problem, perceptions of the redress environment, and consumer characteristics. Complaint behavior and intention to switch brands showed strongest relationships with the first two types of variables. Word of mouth, on the other hand, seemed to be more heavily influenced by the consumer’s level of social interaction, a consumer characteristic. Findings indicate that the three dissatisfaction responses are independent in that they share little if any common variance and they seem to be influenced in different ways by the correlates studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arndt, Johan. 1967. “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product.”Journal of Marketing Research 4 (Augusts): 291–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, William O. and Jesse E. Teel. 1980. “An Investigation of Personal Influences on Consumer Complaining.”Journal of Retailing 56 (Fall): 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Jesse E. Teel and Melissa Crockett. 1980. “A Path Model of Consumer Complaint Behavior.” InMarketing in the 80’s. Eds. Richard P. Bagozzi et al. Chicago: American Marketing Association: 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, Arthur and Alan R. Andreasen. 1977. “Consumer Response to Unsatisfactory Purchases: A Survey of Perceiving Defects, Voicing Complaints, and Obtaining Redress.”Law and Society Review 11 (Spring): 701–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 1976.European Consumers: Their Interests, Aspirations, and Knowledge on Consumer Affairs. Brussels.

  • Day, Ralph L., Klaus Grabicke, Thomas Schaetzle, and Fritz Stauchch 1981. “The Hidden Agenda of Consumer Complaining.”Journal of Retailing 57 (Fall): 86–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, Betty J. and Stephen A. Greyser. 1978. “Consumer Views of Redress Needs.”Journal of Marketing 42 (October): 21–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folkes, Valerie S. 1984. “Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An attributional Approach.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (March): 398–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, Claes and Robert A. Westbrook. 1979. “An Exploratory Study of Assertiveness, Aggressiveness, and Consumer Complaining Behavior.” InAdvances in Consumer Research 6. Ed. William L. Wilkie. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Association for Consumer Research: 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francken, Dick A. 1983. “Postpurchase Consumer Evaluations, Complaint Actions and Repurchase Behavior.”Journal of Economic Psychology 4: 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilly, Mary C. and Betsy D. Gelb 1982 “Post-Purchase Consumer Processes and the Complaining Consumer.”Journal of Consumer Research 9 (December): 323–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granbois, Donald, John O. Summers and Gary L. Frazier. 1977. “Correlates of Consumer Expectation and Complaining Behavior.” InConsumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior Ed. Ralph L. Day. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Robert T. and Philip D. White. 1976. “Methodological Considerations in Cross-National Consumer Research.”Journal of International Business Studies 7 (Fall-Winter): 81–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. 1970.Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, Frederic B. 1977. “Characteristics of Consumer Complainers and Complaint and Repatronage Behavior.” InConsumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior. Ed. Ralph L. Day. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaBarbera, Priscilla A. and David Mazursky. 1983. “A Longitudinal Assessment of Consumer Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: The Dynamic Aspect of the Cognitive Process.”Journal of Marketing Research 20 (November): 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Zarrel V. and Richard M. Durand. 1975. “Some Precautions in Using Canonical Analysis.”Journal of Marketing Research 12 (November): 468–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landon, E. Laird, Jr. 1977. “A Model of Consumer complaint Behavior.” InSatisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior. Ed. Ralph L. Day. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, Vijay, Eitan Muller and Roger A. Kerin. 1984. “Introduction Strategy for New Products with Positive and Negative Word-of-Mouth.”Management Science 30 (December): 1389–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meffert, Heribert and Manfred Bruhn. 1983. “Complaining Behavior and Satisfaction of Consumers: Results From an Empirical Study in Germany.” InInternational Fare in Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior. Eds. Ralph L. Day and H. Keith Hunt. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Joseph W. and Richard A. Werbel. 1973. “Multivariate Analysis of Brand Loyalty for Major Household Appliances.”Journal of Marketing Research 10 (November): 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Fred D. and William R. Darden. 1971. “Mutually Adaptive Effects of Interpersonal Communication.”Journal of Marketing Research 8 (November): 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richins, Marsha L. 1980. “Product Dissatisfaction: Causal Attribution Structure and Strategy.” In 1980Educators’ Conference Proceedings. Eds. Richard P. Bagozzi et al., Chicago: American Marketing Association: 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983a. “Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study.”Journal of Marketing 47 (Winter): 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1983b. “Word of Mouth as an Expression of Product Dissatisfaction.” In.International Fare in Consumer Satisfaction and Complaining Behavior Eds. Ralph L. Day and H. Keith Hunt. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 100–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1983c. “An Analysis of Consumer Interaction Styles in the Marketplace.”Journal of Consumer Research 10 (June): 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Ivan and Richard L. Oliver. 1984. “The Accuracy of Unsolicited Consumer Communications as Indicators of True Consumer Satisfaction/ Dissatisfaction” InAdvances in Consumer Research 11. Ed. Thomas C. Kinnear. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research: 504–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jagdip and Roy D. Howell. 1985. “Consumer Complaining Behavior: A Review and Prospectus.” InConsumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior. Eds. H. Keith Hunt and Ralph L. Day. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University: 59–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technical Assistance Research Programs. 1981.Measuring the Grapevine—Consumer Response and Word-of-Mouth, Washington, D.C.

  • Weinberger, Marc G., Chris T. Allen and William R. Dillon. 1981. “Negative Information: Perspectives and Research Directions.” InAdvances in Consumer Research 8. Ed. Kent B. Monroe. Ann Arbor: Association for Consumer Research: 398–404.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richins, M.L. A multivariate analysis of responses to dissatisfaction. JAMS 15, 24–31 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722168

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722168

Keywords

Navigation