Abstract.
The estimation of cost-effectiveness of pediatric critical care services is an extremely relevant issue for both developing and industrialized nations. Pediatric critical care is expensive and the long outcomes are still relatively unclear. From the perspective of patients who receive the benefits of these services, there may be little controversy regarding cost-effectiveness. However, the issue becomes very complex when attempts are made to identify which patients will benefit most. This also needs to be considered while developing public policy when decisions for allocation of limited resources need to be made within health care systems, and choices need to be made between the provision of health care and other public services. This article addresses the complex issue of economic evaluations and describes various type of cost analyses. The difference between charges and costs is defined, and a discussion of the measurement of costs and benefits, and their relationship to outcomes research is provided. Although there is not a unique answer to the issue of cost-effectiveness for pediatric critical care services, the available literature particularly from the United States is summarized, and the ethical implications explored.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Heyland DK, Gafni A, Kernerman P, Keenan S, Chalfin D. How to use the results of an economic evaluation.Crit Care Med 1999; 27 (6): 1195–202.
Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges.Ann Intern Med 1982; 96 (1): 102–109.
Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care.Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 1996; 44: 166–206.
Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score.Crit Care Med 1988; 16: 1110–1116.
Fiser DH. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care.J. Paediatric 1992; 121: 68–74.
Gemke RJ, Bonsel GJ. Reliability and validity of a comprehensive health status measure in a heterogeneous population of children admitted to intensive care.J Clin Epidemiology 1996: 49 (3) : 327–333.
Sachdeva R, Jefferson L, East D, Beck JR, Brody B. A new quantitative method to estimate outcomes of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).Pediatrics 1997; 100 (3): 449.
De KeizerNF, Bonsel GJ, Gemke RJ. Health status prediction in critically ill children: a pilot study introducing Standardized Health Ratios.Quality of Life Research 1997; 6 (2): 192–199.
Klem SA, Pollack MM, Geston PR. Cost, resource utilization, and severity of illness in intensive care.J Pediatr 1990; 116: 231–237.
Chalom R, Raphaely RC, Costarino AT Jr. Hospital costs of pediatric intensive care.Crit Care Med 1999; 27 (10): 2079–2085.
Kapadia AS, Chan W, Sachdeva R, Moya LA, Jefferson LS. Predicting duration of stay in a pediatric intensive care unit: A Markovian approach.Eur J OP Res 2000; 124 (2) : 353–359.
Kanter RK. Post-intensive care unit paediatric hospital stay and estimated costs.Crit Care Med 2000; 28 (1): 220–223.
Sachdeva RC, Guntupalli KK. International comparisons of outcomes of ICUs.Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 2032–2033.
Sachdeva RC, Jefferson LS, Coss-Bu Jet al. Effects of availability of patient-related charges on practice patterns and cost containment in the pediatric intensive care unit.Crit Care Med 1996; 24: 501–506.
Sachdeva RC, Cantor SB, Jefferson LS, Beck JR. Health polity implications of a cost-effectiveness analysis for admitting patients to the pediatric intensive care unit.Disease Management and Clinical Outcomes 1997; 1 (3): 81–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723012.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sachdeva, R.C. Intensive care — a cost effective option for developing countries?. Indian J Pediatr 68, 339–342 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721841
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721841