Skip to main content
Log in

Collecting conjoint data through telephone interviews

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data collection for conjoint analysis is relatively new. The current study examines the reliability and convergent validity for selected user segments vs. the mail questionnaire alternative. The results attest the telephone collection procedure is both reliable and valid relative to collecting data with mail questionnaires.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acito, Franklin 1977 “An Investigation of Some Data Collection Issues in Conjoint Measurement.”Proceedings: American Marketing Association Educator's Conference, 82–85.

  • Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D.W. 1959 “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Mulimethod Matrix.”Psychological Bulletin, 81–105.

  • Cattin, Philippe and Wittink, Dick R. 1982. “Commercial Use of Conjoint Analysis: A Survey,”Journal of Marketing 46 (Summer), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, W. J. 1980.Practical Nonparametric Statistics. New York: Wiley, 2nd ed., 256–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, O. J. and Clark, V. 1969 “Correlation Coefficients Measured on the Same Individuals.”Journal of the American Statistical Association, 366–377.

  • Green, Paul E. 1974 “On the Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives.”Journal of Consumer Research, 11 (September), 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. and Rao, Vithala R. 1971 “Conjoint Measurement for Quantifying Judgmental Data.”Journal of Marketing Research, 8 (August), 355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. and Srinivasan, V. 1978. “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook.”Journal of Consumer Research, 5 (September), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. and Wind, Yoram 1975 “New Way to Measure Consumer's Judgments.”Harvard Business Review (July–August), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Richard M. 1975 “A Simple Method for Pairwise Monotone Regression.”Psychometrika, 40 (June), 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Richard M. 1979 “Measurement of Consumer Values Using Computer Interactive Techniques,” Paper presented at ORSA/TIMS, Stanford University (March).

  • Johnson, Richard M. 1980. “Trade-off Analysis: The First Ten Years,” Address to the AMA, Atlanta, Ga. (June).

  • Magnusson, David 1967Test Theory. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, Norish K. 1982 “Structural Reliability and Stability of Nonmetric Conjoint Analysis,”Journal of Marketing Research, (May), 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, James M. and Best, Roger (1979) “Conjoint Measurement: Temporal Stability and Structural Reliability.”Journal of Marketing Research (February), 26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, Norman H.,et al. (1975)Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, Barnett R. and Srinivasan, V. 1975 “A Consumer Preference Approach to the Planning of Rural Primary Health Care Facilities.” Research Paper No. 172, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University (July).

  • Siegel, Madhav N. 1982 “Reliability of Conjoint Analysis: Contrasting Data Collection Procedures.”Journal of Marketing Research, (February), 139–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Sidney 1956.Nonparametric Statistics. New York: McGraw, 220–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slakter, Malcolm J. 1972.Statistical Inference for Educational Researchers. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilson, T.C. Collecting conjoint data through telephone interviews. JAMS 12, 190–199 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721808

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721808

Keywords

Navigation