Skip to main content
Log in

A structural assessment of the original and a modified version of the CAD scale

  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Validation of Cohen's CAD scale was attempted on a sample similar to that used in the scale's original development. Results were not in accord with the underlying theory. This prompted an attempt to refine the CAD instrument by deletion of ineffective items. The revised scale was examined for reliability and validity. Results were sufficiently weak to suggest that marketers should have diminished confidence in applying CAD as a measure of interpersonal orientation and should initiate development of other approaches for personality assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. “Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix,”Psychological Bulletin, 56: 81–105, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.B. “Interpersonal Response Traits and Consumer Behavior,” unpublished doctoral dissertation, U.C.L.A., 1966.

  • —, “An Interpersonal Orientation to the Study of Consumer Behavior,”Journal of Marketing Research, 4:270–7, August 1967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.B., and Barban, A.M., “An Interactive Consumer Product Typological System: A Progress Report and Partial Evaluation,” working paper #12, Pennsylvania State University, December 1970.

  • —, and Golden E., “Informational Social Influence and Product Evaluation,”Journal of Applied Psychology, 56: 54–9, February 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L.J., “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests,”Psychometrika, 16: 297–334, September 1951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F.B. “Psychological and Objective Factors in the Prediction of Brand Choice: Ford versus Chevrolet,”Journal of Business, 32: 340–69, 1959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K.B.Our Inner Conflicts, New York: W.W. Norton & Co., 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H.F. “The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis,”Educational and Psychological Measurements, 21: 141–51, Spring 1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassarjian, H.H. “Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review,”Journal of Marketing Research, 8: 409–18, November 1971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kernan, J.B. “The CAD Instrument in Behavioral Diagnosis,” D.M. Gardner ed.,Proceedings, Association for Consumer Research, 307–12, 1971.

  • Noerager, J.P. “An Assessment of CAD: A Personality Instrument Developed Specifically for Marketing Research,”Journal of Marketing Research, 16: 53–9, February 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C.Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runkel, P.J. and McGrath, J.E.Research on Human Behavior New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M.J. and Becherer, R.C. “A Multivariate Test of CAD Instrument Construct Validity,” B.B. Anderson ed.,Proceedings, Association for Consumer Research, 149–54, 1975.

  • Wells, W.D. “Psychographics: A Critical Review,”Journal of Marketing Research,” 12:196–213, May 1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sullivan, G.L., O'Connor, P.J. A structural assessment of the original and a modified version of the CAD scale. JAMS 12, 41–51 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02721798

Keywords

Navigation