Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of thoracic duct blockage on early enteral nutrition for patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery

  • Published:
The Japanese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: We have previously reported the beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition (EN) after esophageal cancer surgery. This randomized control study was conducted to determine whether immediate EN is beneficial or not for patients whose thoracic ducts were ligated, as well as those whose thoracic ducts were preserved.Patients and methods: Thirty-nine patients who underwent radical resection of the esophageal cancer entered this trial. After stratifying into two groups—patients whose thoracic ducts were preserved [D(+)] and those whose thoracic ducts were ligated [D(−)], they were randomly divided into two groups—the patients who received early EN and those who received parenteral nutrition (PN) followed by delayed enteral feeding. Thus, the number of patients in the D(+)-EN group, D(+)-PN group, D(−)-EN group and D(−)-PN group were 13, 12, 7 and 7, respectively. The mortality and morbidity rates, and several blood chemistries were compared between the EN groups and the PN groups.Results: Total lymphocyte count showed a significant early increase and serum c-reactive protein (CRP) was significantly decreased in the D(+)-EN group compared to the D(+)-PN group. However those differences were not observed between the D(−) groups. Serum total bilirubin was significantly decreased in the both EN groups compared to the PN groups. The mortality and morbidity rates were not different between the EN group and the PN group in the D(+) patients and also in the D(−) patients.Conclusions: Patients whose thoracic ducts were ligated did not obtain any other benefit from early enteral feeding except for bilirubin metabolism. Early enteral feeding is not recommended for patients whose thoracic ducts are ligated during radical resection of a cancer in the thoracic esophagus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merrigan BA, Winter DC, O'sullivan GC. Chylothorax. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 15–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cope O, Litwin SB. Contribution of lymphatic system to the replenishment of plasma volume following hemorrhage. Ann Surg 1962; 156: 655–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hayashi A, Johnston MG, Nelson W, Hamilton S, McHale NG. Increased intrinsic pumping of intestinal lymphatics following hemorrhage in anesthetized sheep. Circ Res 1987; 60: 265–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boulanger BR, Lloyd SJ, Walker M, Johnston MG. Intrinsic pumping of mesenteric lymphatics is increased after hemorrhage in awake sheep. Circ Shock 1994; 43: 95–101.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lloyd SJ, Boulanger BR, Johnston MG. The lymphatic circulation plays a dynamic role in blood volume and plasma protein restitution after hemorrhage. Shock 1996; 5: 416–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grims JM, Buss LA, Brace RA. Blood volume restitution after hemorrhage in adult sheep. Am J Physiol 1987; 253: R541–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aiko S, Yoshizumi Y, Sugiura Y, Matsuyama T, Naito Y, Matsuzaki J, et al. Beneficial effects of immediate enteral nutrition after esophageal cancer surgery. Surg Today 2001; 31: 971–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Isono K, Sato H, Nakayama K. Results of a nationwide study on the three-field lymph node dissection of esophageal cancer. Oncology 1991; 48: 411–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Duce AM, García MS, Barberán MT, Vincent JG. Thoracic duct drainage. Eur J Surg 1996; 162: 241–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Imamura M, Shimada Y, Kanda T, Miyahara T, Hashimoto M, Tobe T, et al. Hemodynamic changes after resection of thoracic duct for en bloc resection of esophageal cancer. Surg Today 1992; 22: 226–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Neyazaki T, Kupic EA, Marshall WH, Abrams HL. Collateral lymphatico-venous communications after experimental obstruction of the thoracic duct. Radiology 1965; 85: 423–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Machleder HI, Paulus H. Clinical and immunological alterations observed in patients undergoing long-term thoracic duct drainage. Surgery 1978; 84: 157–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Starzl TE, Koep LJ, Weil R 3rd, Halgrimson CG, Franks JJ. Thoracic duct drainage in organ transplantation: Will it permit better immunosuppression? Transplant Proc 1979; 11: 276–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Fish JC, Sarles HE, Remmers AR Jr, Townsend CM Jr, Bell JD, Flye MW. Renal transplantation after thoracic duct drainage. Ann Surg 1981; 193: 752–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Takeuchi N, Ohshima S, Ono Y, Sahashi M, Matsuura O, Yamada S, et al. Five-year results of thoracic duct drainage in living related donor kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 1421–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dumont AE, Mayer DJ, Mulholland JH. The suppression of immunologic activity by diversion of thoracic duct lymph. Ann Surg 1964; 160: 373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Olofsson P, Nylander G, Olsson P. Endotoxin-transport routes and kinetics in intestinal ischemia. Acta Chir Scand 1985; 151: 635–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olofsson P, Nylander G, Olsson P. Endotoxin: Routes of transport in experimental peritonitis. Am J Surg 1986; 151: 443–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Haskel Y, Lu Q, Berg RD, van Rooijen N, Goris RJ, et al. Macrophage elimination increases bacterial translocation and gut origin septicemia but attenuates symptoms and mortality rate in a model of systemic inflammation. Ann Surg 1993; 218: 791–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Nolan JP. Endotoxin, reticuloendothelial function and liver injury. Hepatology 1981; 1: 458–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lemaire LCJM, van Lanschot JJB, Stoutenbeek CP, van Deventer JH, Dankert J, Oosting H, et al. Thoratic duct in patients with multiple organ failure: No major route of bacterial translocation. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 128–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Güler O, Ogras S, Aydin M, Dilek FH, Delek ON. The effect of lymphatic blockage on the amount of endotoxin in portal circulation, nitric oxide synthesis, and the liver in dogs with peritonitis. Surg Today 1999; 29: 735–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gennari R, Dominioni L, Imperatori A, Bianchi V, Maroni P, Dionigi R. Alteration in lymphocyte subsets as prognosticators of postoperative infections. Eur J Surg 1994; 161: 493–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kono K, Takahashi A, Iizuka H, Fujii H, Sekikawa T, Matsumoto Y. Effects of oesophagectomy on monocyte-induced apoptosis of peripheral blood T lymphocytes. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsujinaka T, Kido Y, Ogawa M, Shiozaki H, Murata A, Kobayashi K, et al. Postoperative hyperbilirubinemia after resection of thoracic esophageal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 1473–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Trauner, M, Fickert, P, Stauber RE. Inflammation-induced cholestasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 14: 946–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aiko, S., Yoshizumi, Y., Matsuyama, T. et al. Influences of thoracic duct blockage on early enteral nutrition for patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery. Jpn J Thorac Caridovasc Surg 51, 263–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02719376

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02719376

Key words

Navigation