Skip to main content
Log in

Microstructural analysis of failure of a stainless steel bone plate implant

  • Peer Reviewed Articles
  • Published:
Practical Failure Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stainless steel is frequently used for bone fracture fixation in spite of its sensitivity to pitting and cracking in chloride containing environments (such as organic fluids) and its susceptibility to fatigue and corrosion fatigue. A 316L stainless steel plate implant used for fixation of a femoral fracture failed after only 16 days of service and before bone callus formation had occurred. The steel used for the implant met the requirements of ASTM Standard F138 but did contain a silica-alumina inclusion that served as the initiation point for a fatigue/corrosion fatigue fracture. The fracture originated as a consequence of stress intensification at the edge of a screw hole located just above the bone fracture; several fatigue cracks were also observed on the opposite side of the screw hole edge. The crack propagated in a brittle-like fashion after a limited number of cycles under unilateral bending. The bending loads were presumably a consequence of leg oscillation during assisted perambulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L.E. Sloter and H.R. Piehler: inCorrosion and Degradation of Implants Materials, ASTM STP 684, B.C. Syrett and A. Acharya, ed., ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 1979, pp. 173–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.A. Amis, J.D. Bromage, and M. Larvin:Biomaterials, 1987, vol. 8(2), pp. 153–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. D.I. Bardos: inHandbook of Stainless Steels, D. Peckner and I.M. Bernstein, ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1977, pp. 42.1–42.10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.G. Laing:Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1973, vol. 4(2), pp. 249–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Traisnel, D. le Maguer, H.F. Hildebrand, and A. Iost:Clin. Mater., 1990, vol. 5, pp. 309–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O.E.M. Pohler: inASM Handbook, Vol. 11,Failure Analysis and Prevention, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1995, pp. 670–94.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J.M. Spivak, J.D. Zuckerman, F.J. Kummer, and V.H. Frankel:J. Orthop. Trauma, vol. 5(3), pp. 325–331.

  8. E. Gautier, S.M. Perren, and J. Cordey:Injury, 2000, vol. 31, Suppl 3, pp. C14-C20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.M. Banovetz, R. Sharp, R.A. Probe, and J.O. Anglen:J. Orthop. Trauma, 1996, vol. 10(6), pp. 389–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. E.W. Lee and H.T. Kim:J. Arthroplasty, 2001, vol. 16(2), pp. 236–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A.A. Syed, J.G. Kennedy, H. Mullet, J. O’Flanagan, and D. Taylor:Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 2000, vol. 120(5–6), pp. 366–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Gaebler, S. Stanzl-Tschegg, E.K. Tschegg, C. Kukla, W.A. Menth-Chiar, G.E. Wozasek, and T. Heinz:Injury, 1999, vol. 30(2), pp. 91–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. C.M. Styles, S.L. Evans, and P.J. Gregson:Biomaterials, 1998, vol. 19(11–12), pp. 1057–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Proverbio, E., Bonaccorsi, L.M. Microstructural analysis of failure of a stainless steel bone plate implant. Practical Failure Analysis 1, 33–38 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715331

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02715331

Keywords

Navigation