Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Technology and trade: Empirical evidences for the major five industrialized countries

  • Articles
  • Published:
Review of World Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Technology and Trade: Empirical Evidence for the Major Five Industrialized Countries. — The conclusion that prices alone cannot explain the major disturbances in trade market shares emerges from many empirical studies on international trade flows. This paper aims at introducing supply-side variables in market shares equations, namely R&D expenditures and gross fixed capital formation, along the lines of the new theory on international trade and of the literature on technology and trade relations. The empirical work is carried out on the major five industrialized countries and on twenty manufacturing industries. The results show that the supply-side variables have played a crucial role over the last decade.

Zusammenfassung

Technologie und Handel. Empirische Evidenz für die fünf wichtigsten Industrieländer. - Aus vielen Untersuchungen der internationalen Handelsströme ergibt sich, daß die Preise allein die größeren Verschiebungen in den Marktanteilen nicht erklären können. Die Verfasser versuchen, Variable für die Angebotsseite in die Gleichungen für die Marktanteile einzuführen, nämlich F&E-Ausgaben und die Kapitalbildung entsprechend der neuen Theorie des internationalen Handels und der Literatur über die Beziehungen zwischen Technologie und Handel. Der empirische Teil bezieht sich auf die fünf großen Industrieländer und auf zwanzig Industriezweige. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, daß die Variablen der Angebotsseite in der letzten Dekade eine entscheidende Rolle gespielt haben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armington, Paul S., “A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production”.IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 16, 1969, pp. 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretscb, David B., Hideki Yamawaki, “R&D Rivalry, Industrial Policy, and U.S.- Japanese Trade”.The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 70, 1988, pp. 438–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Terry, “International Trade and Economic Growth: An Alternative to the Neo-Classical Approach”.Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 1, 1977, pp. 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binkley, James K., “Estimation of Variances in the Grouped Heteroskedasticity Model”.The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, 1989, pp. 659–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bovar, Odile, Catherine Zaidman, “Efficacité des Systèmes Nationaux de Recherche et Développement: un Essai d'Explication”. In: Dominique Guellec (Ed.),Innovation et Compétitivité. INSEE 1993, pp. 69–94.

  • Brenton, Paul A., L. Alan Winters, “Bilateral Trade Elasticities for Exploring the Effects of 1992”. In: L. Alan Winters (Ed.),Trade Flows and Trade Policy After 1992. Cambridge 1992, pp. 266–285.

  • Dixit, Avinash, Joseph E. Stiglitz, “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity”.The American Economic Review, Vol. 67, 1977, pp. 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, Jan, “International Competitiveness”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 98,1988, pp. 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitoussi, Jean P., Anthony B. Atkinson, Olivier Blanchard, John S. Flemming, Edmond Malinvaud, Edmund S. Phelps, Robert M. Solow,Competitive Disinflation: The Mark und Budgetary Politics in Europe. Oxford 1993.

  • Geraci, Vincent J., Wilfried Prewo, “An Empirical Demand and Supply Model of Multilateral Trade”.The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64, 1982, pp. 432–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Morris, Mohsin S. Khan, “Income and Price Effects in Foreign Trade”. In: Ronald W. Jones, Peter B. Kenen (Eds.),Handbook of International Economics. Amsterdam 1985, pp. 1041–1105.

  • Goto, Akira, Kazuyuki Suzuki, “R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries”.The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, 1989, pp. 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, Christine, Paul Taylor, Rob Wilson, “Innovation and Export Volumes and Prices: A Disaggregated Study”.Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 46, 1994, pp. 102–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Gene M., Carl Shapiro, “Dynamic R&D Competition”.The Economic Journal, Vol. 97, 1987, pp. 372–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan,Monopolistic Competition in Trade Theory. Princeton University, Special Papers in International Finance No. 16. Princeton, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houthakker, Henry S., Stephen P. Magee, “Income and Price Elasticities in World Trade”.The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 51, 1969, pp. 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaskold-Gabszewicz, Jean, Jacques-François Thisse, “Entry (and Exit) in a Differentiated Industry”.Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 22, 1980, pp. 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, George G., William E. Griffith, Carter C. Hill, Tsoung-Chao Lee,The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2nd Ed. New York 1985.

  • Kaldor, Nicholas, “The Effect of Devaluations on Trade in Manufactures”. In: Nicholas Kaldor,Further Essays on Applied Economics. London 1978, pp. 99–118.

  • Kellman, Mitchell, “Relative Prices and International Competitiveness. An Empirical Investigation”.Empirical Economics, Vol. 8, 1983, pp. 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravis, Irving B., Robert E. Lipsey, “Price Behavior in the Light of Balance of Pay-ments: Theories”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 8, 1978, pp. 193–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreinin, Mordechai E., Lawrence H. Officer,The Monetary Approach to the Balance of Payments: A Survey. Princeton Studies of International Finance No. 43. Princeton, NJ, 1978.

  • Krugman, Paul R., “New Theories of Trade among Industrial Countries”.The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 73, 1983, pp. 343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, “Differences in Income Elasticities and Trends in Real Exchange Rates”.European Economic Review, Vol. 33, 1989, pp. 1031–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S.,Econometrics. New York 1977.

  • Norman, Victor D., “Assessing Trade and Welfare Effects of Trade Liberalization: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to CGE Modelling with Imperfect Competition”.European Economic Review, Vol. 34, 1990, pp. 746–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD,La Technologie dans un Monde en Évolution. Paris 1991.

  • Oliveira-Martins, Joaquim, Joel Toujas-Bernate, “Macroeconomic Import Functions with Imperfect Competition. An Application to the EC Trade”. In: L. Alan Winters (Ed.),Trade Flows and Trade Policy After 1992. Cambridge 1992, pp. 237–263.

  • Owen, Robert F., Sybrand Schim van der Loeff,A Dynamic Perspective on R&D as a Determinant of Japanese and American Trade Flows: A Disaggregate Analysis. Inst. of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University Discussion Paper No. 205. Osaka 1989.

  • Passet, Olivier, Veronique Przedborski, Veronique Riches, “De la Reprise de l'Investissement à la Croissance du Capital”.Observations et Diagnostics Économiques, Vol. 30, 1990, pp. 85–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, Keith L., “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”.Research Policy, Vol. 13, 1984, pp. 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, John D., “Constant-Market Shares Analysis of Export Growth”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 1, 1971, pp. 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaked, Amer, John Sutton, “Natural Oligopolies”.Econometrica, Vol. 51, 1983, pp. 1469–1483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soete, Luc L.G., “A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory”.Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, Vol. 117, 1981, pp. 638–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -,Sectoral and Technological Taxonomies. CPB Working Paper No. 41. La Haye 1987.

  • Spencer, Barbara J., James A. Brander, “International R&D Rivalry and Industrial Strategy”.The Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 50, 1983, pp. 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terleckyj, Nestor E.,Effects of R&D on the Productivity Growth of Industries: An Exploratory Study. National Planning Association Report No. 140. Washington, D.C., 1974.

  • Thirlwall, Antony P., “The Balance of Payments Constraint as an Explanation of International Growth Rate Differences”.Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, No. 128, 1979, pp. 45–53.

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Magnier, A., Toujas-Bernate, J. Technology and trade: Empirical evidences for the major five industrialized countries. Rev World Econ 130, 494–520 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707610

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02707610

Navigation