Skip to main content
Log in

Arithmetic versus geometric effective exchange rates

  • Bemerkungen
  • Published:
Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The debate in recent years concerning the appropriate manner of defining effective exchange rates has largely ignored the question of the proper mathematical formulation to employ. As a result, in the literature the choice of mathematical formulation has often been a haphazard one, governed far more by custom than by a particular belief in the merit of the index chosen 1. Moreover, in many cases, the formulation employed has not been specified, apparently in the belief that the term“tradeweighted (effective) exchange rate” is sufficiently precise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Artus, Jacques R., andRudolf R. Rhomberg,“A Multilateral Exchange Rate Model”.IMF, Staff Papers, Vol. 20, 1973, pp. 591–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Finland,“The Amendment to the Currency Act”.Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin, Vol. 52, Feb. 1978, pp. 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Stanley W.,Exchange Policies for Less Developed Countries in a World of Floating Rates. Princeton Essays in International Finance, No. 119, Princeton 1976.

  • Central Bank of Malta,“The Malta Pound Exchange Rate”.Central Bank of Malta Quarterly Review, Vol. 12, March 1979, pp. 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Bank of Sweden,“Development of the Swedish Exchange Rate”.Central Bank of Sweden Quarterly Review, 1979, No. 4, pp. 9–12.

  • Coninx, Raymond G. F.,Foreign Exchange Today. Cambridge 1978.

  • Crockett, Andrew D., andSaleh M. Nsouli,“Exchange Rate Policies for Developing Countries”.The Journal of Development Studies, Vol. 13, 1977, pp. 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche, Bundesbank, “Remarques relatives au calcul de la valeur extérieure pondérée du deutschmark”.Rapports Mensuels, Vol. 31, April 1979, pp. 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Fred, andIlse Higgins,“An Indicator of Effective Exchange Rates”.IMF, Staff Papers, Vol. 17, 1970, pp. 453–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honohan, Patrick, “Exchange Rate Indices”.Central Bank of Ireland Quarterly Bulletin, Summer 1979, pp. 76–92.

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF) [a],Annual Report of the Executive Board for the Financial Year Ended April 30, 1979. Washington 1979.

  • - [b],Direction of Trade Yearbook 1972—1978. Washington 1979.

  • - [c].International Financial Statistics. Washington, various issues.

  • — [d],“Basket Valuation of SDR Takes Effect”.IMF Survey, Vol. 3, 1974, pp. 209, 213–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, Alexandre,“The New Exchange Rate Regime and the Developing Countries”.The Journal of Finance, Vol. 33, 1978, pp. 795–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York,“Effective Exchange Rates: Nominal and Real”.World Financial Markets, May 1978, pp. 3–17.

  • -,“Effective Exchange Rates Compared”.World Financial Markets, April 1979, pp. 6–13.

  • Rana, Pradumna B.,“Exchange Rate Risk Under Generalized Floating: Eight Asian Countries”.Journal of International Economics, Vol. 11, 1981, pp. 459–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reserve Bank of New Zealand,“The Flexible Exchange Rate System”.Reserve Bank of New Zealand Bulletin, Vol. 42, 1979, pp. 271–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhomberg, Rudolf R.,“Indices of Effective Exchange Rates”.IMF, Staff Papers, Vol. 23, 1976, pp. 88–112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Brodsky, D.A. Arithmetic versus geometric effective exchange rates. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 118, 546–562 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706265

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706265

Keywords

Navigation